A few days ago we did a two part post on the predicament the US faces in Iraq over Sadr and the Madi army.Doug at Driveby ,who is a frequent commenter here and at the BC has a new blog and put up this post referring to the Newsweek article on Sadr. The Newsweek article is a superb piece and Doug comments on it. There is another post by Doug above and it is worthy of a read. We reprint Doug's post in its entirety:
..."In the winter of 2004, a senior adviser to Ambassador Paul Bremer, the American proconsul in Iraq, was traveling in the south, meeting with friendly clerics and community leaders.
"I could see how frightened they were of [Sadr] and his Mahdi Army," recalls the aide, Larry Diamond.
"I was driven past an area, a kind of compound where his black-clad army was training for the upcoming revolution to seize power and take over.
It just dawned on me that these people were going to make this place an authoritarian hell of a new sort, Taliban style, and would murder a lot of our allies in the process."
Diamond went to Bremer and gave him his assessment:
the United States urgently needed to act against Sadr. Bremer responded that he was waiting for a new plan from Coalition forces.
"I first wanted to go after him when he had probably fewer than 200 followers,"
Bremer recalled in an interview with NEWSWEEK last week.
"I couldn't make it happen ... the Marines were resisting doing anything."
But in the meantime, on March 28, 2004, Bremer suspended publication of Sadr's newspaper after it ran an editorial praising the 9/11 attacks on America as a "blessing from God."
The response was swift: mass demonstrations, which led to the first of two Sadr uprisings in 2004.
In a final meeting between Diamond and Bremer on April 1, Diamond pressed the point that the United States needed more troops in Iraq. It was around 8 p.m., and Bremer's dinner was sitting on a tray uneaten. He looked exhausted.
"And he just didn't want to hear it," says Diamond.
"In retrospect, I think he had gone to the well on this issue of more troops during 2003, had gotten nowhere ... and had just resigned himself to the fact that these troops just weren't going to come.
I think the tragedy is that everyone just gave up."...
---
In Washington, some politicians still talk about "victory," while others aim only to stabilize the country and leave with some semblance of dignity.
Many in the U.S. capital are dusting off yesterday's proposals for tomorrow's problems—more training, more troops, disarming the militias, more stability in Baghdad.
The GOP presidential front runner for 2008, John McCain, would prefer to increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq by 20,000, at least temporarily. He has also called for Sadr to be "taken out." But it may be too late.The movement may now be more important than the man. Sadr "is faced with a common problem," says Toby Dodge of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. "He can't control the use of his brand name, the use of his legitimacy."
The Mahdi Army has other sources of cash. It's taken control of gas stations throughout large parts of Baghdad, and dominates the Shia trade in propane-gas canisters, which Iraqis use for cooking. Sometimes the militiamen sell the propane at a premium, earning healthy profits; at other times they sell it at well below market rates, earning gratitude from the poor and unemployed.A key source of Sadr's income is Muslim tithes—or khoms—collected at mosques. But his militiamen also run extortion and protection rackets—demanding money to keep certain businesses and individuals "safe." One Iraqi in a tough neighborhood, who did not want to reveal his name out of fear, says he pays the local Mahdi Army the equivalent of $13 a month for protection.
---
No one in Iraq talks about arresting Sadr for the murder of al-Khoei anymore. That seems like ages ago—back when Sadr's armed supporters were estimated in the hundreds, compared with many thousands today. Now diplomats speak of trying to keep Sadr inside the political system, hoping he can tame his followers.
Posted by Doug at 11:30 PM
You need to consider getting a new hat.
ReplyDeleteI've got my germainium crystal telegraph repeater up there, so no can do.
ReplyDeleteSuperb entry, Doug!
ReplyDeleteTerrific read!
Here's the one about Fugitive Leader Harith Al Dhari
ReplyDelete---
But I recommend you read the entire
NEWSWEEK Interview
---
Thanks, Tiger.
ReplyDeleteI finally expressed my sadly delayed Kudos to you in the previous thread!
Keep up the good work, the truth will out!
here is the list of Rumsfeld's options that went out before he was fired:
ReplyDeleteSpecifics on his options checklist:
_"Publicly announce a set of benchmarks agreed to by the Iraqi government and the U.S. ... to chart a path ahead for the Iraqi government and Iraqi people (to get them moving) and for the U.S. public (to reassure them that progress can and is being made)."
_"Significantly increase U.S. trainers and embeds, and transfer more U.S. equipment to Iraqi security forces."
_"Initiate a reverse embeds program ... by putting one or more Iraqi soldiers with every U.S. and possibly coalition squad."
_Aggressively beef up Iraqi ministries by reaching out to U.S. military retirees and Reserve and National Guard volunteers.
_Conduct an accelerated drawdown of U.S. bases, noting they have already been reduced from 110 to 55. "Plan to get down to 10 to 15 bases by April 2007, and to 5 bases by July 2007."
_"Retain high-end ... capability ... to target al-Qaida, death squads, and Iranians in Iraq, while drawing down all other coalition forces, except those necessary to provide certain key enablers" for Iraqi forces.
_Provide U.S. security forces "only for those provinces or cities that openly request U.S. help and that actively cooperate."
_Stop rewarding "bad behavior" with reconstruction funds and start rewarding "good behavior."
_"Position substantial U.S. forces near the Iranian and Syrian borders to reduce infiltration and, importantly, reduce Iranian influence on the Iraqi government."
_Withdraw U.S. forces from vulnerable positions and move to a quick reaction force status, operating from within Iraq and Kuwait, to be available when Iraqi security forces need assistance.
_"Begin modest withdrawals of U.S. and coalition forces (start `taking our hand off the cycle seat') so Iraqis know they have to pull up their socks, step up and take responsibility for their country."
Very interesting about Bremer faulting the Marines for Sadr. Bing West wrote that the situation in Falluja got out of hand because the Marines would not act firmly against the insurgents. Then jihadists terrorized the local populace into submission while the Marines tried the softly, softly approach.
ReplyDeleteAlso, We have known that many of the so called Holy Men or Imams are simply mercenary charlatans. In Falluja, the imams found that preaching against the infidels filled the coffers.
In Fallujah I it was definitely NOT the Marines that called it off:
ReplyDeleteThe Marine Commander in charge there was quite outspoken about how removed from reality a policy of attack, encircle, and prepare to kill the enemy then CALL IT OFF was!
Somebody up the chain gave the order, along with many many others for FEAR OF WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN!
Lincoln would have done his job and found someone who would fight, but then GWB is no Lincoln!
Re: Fugitive Leader Harith Al Dhari
ReplyDeleteGet the Russians on the phone, see if they have anymore polonium and somebody who wants to make a lot of money.
Doug:
ReplyDeleteI didn't say the Marines called it off. I said, according to Bing West, they allowed it to get out of control. When they lost control, the Blackwater contractors were brutally killed, the Marines in Falluja were reluctant to act strongly against the insurgents who were by that time flipping us the finger in broad day light; daring us to do anything. Washington (civilian and military)wanted a quick, decisive, powerful response to Blackwater, Marines did not.
Doug:
ReplyDeleteAccording to Bing West, it was the Marines in Falluja who let the situation get to the point where insurgents got the upper hand, killed the Blackwater contractors and essentially dared us to do anything about it. The brass and politicos in DC wanted something big done right away. The Marines wanted to wait, exact revenge later. I agree, the decision to back down during Falluja I was one of the saddest days of the war. It sent the wrong signals to everyone; us and them.
Two similar comments because I thought the first one has disappeared into the ether.
ReplyDeletedid spill your coffee Whit?
ReplyDeleteHu Dat? and Buddy Larsen are still in the Ball room at the Masquerade party . It is very funny
ReplyDeleteThe hard core party animals will always be the last to leave a ballroom.
ReplyDeleteI let them know you spoke with the landlord who agreed to allow the party to continue.
ReplyDeleteYou have to see
ReplyDeletetiger's post this morning. scroll down and look at the pictures if you are on info overload.
CNN is reporting this. Pay attention to the last line on what I clipped. I'll be these guys wish they were being waterboarded...
ReplyDelete"RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (CNN) -- Saudi security officials said Saturday they foiled a planned terrorist suicide attack and arrested 139 suspected Islamist militants who were in "sleeper cells" believed to be affiliated with al Qaeda.
A senior official in the Saudi Interior Ministry told CNN that the suspects, who are from several Arab nations, were monitored by Saudi security agents for several months. They rounded the men up just before the expected attack was launched.
The suspects, arrested in different areas of Saudi Arabia, were being interrogated Saturday, the official said."..
_"Significantly increase U.S. trainers and embeds, and transfer more U.S. equipment to Iraqi security forces."
ReplyDelete_"Initiate a reverse embeds program ... by putting one or more Iraqi soldiers with every U.S. and possibly coalition squad."
For 43 months I have taken this position
Drawing analogies to the KATUSA Program in Korea, speaking of techniques used in Central America and 'Nam.
But these options were not taken seriously, Prejudging the Iraqi as incapable, untrustworthy and to dangerous for US to interact with.
Thus at Camp Tanji, the site CounterInsurgency headquaters of the US Military the Iraqi and US troops were segregated, for US troops "safty". Force Protection taking the premier position over Victory. Senator Allen, in his debate with Mr Webb made this point of importance, strongly.
I know the mantra for enlisted Marines is
KILL the Haji
Hear it from time to time when the crowd scenes from Iraq are on the TV and the Marine vet from Iraq is in the room.
Not the best attitude for a trainer to have, a desire to kill the trainees.
I do not know, but doubt that the embed training process can be accelerated, it normally takes a while to build the bonds of trust.
Doubt we have the time required, now, but on that point I could be wrong.
Catch and Release
No Justice, No Peace.
Rat:
ReplyDeleteLike you, I suspect time as run out and the opportunity lost, but one thing is for sure, if we leave, we'll never know.
On the other hand, if we stay and fail then would the added time, money and lives have been worth it?
Worth it, whit?
ReplyDeleteTo empower Mr Maliki, Mr al-Sadr's frontman?
Provide Iraq with a Demo-crazy?
Mr Abdel Aziz Hakim, the SCIRI leader has gotten defacto control of the Southern provinces. The Parliment approved their forming a autonomous region, similar to that of the Jurds, in the north.
"...SCIRI has thrown its weight behind a federated Iraq in which southern provinces are joined in a region similar to an autonomous Kurdish area in northern Iraq. Fearing isolation in the mostly desert center of the country, Sunni Arabs see federalism as a recipe for Iraq's breakup and suspect an Iranian hand.
Federalism is enshrined in the constitution adopted in a referendum a year ago. Parliament this month agreed to allow creation of federal regions, empowering provincial councils elected in the next local polls to initiate such action, subject to the approval of voters. (26. October 2006).
So before we can decide if the additional efforts are "worth it" we have to decide what the meaning of "it" is.
Who is the Enemy?
Where are they and why are they not dead or dying, today?
2164th quoted, "The suspects, arrested in different areas of Saudi Arabia, were being interrogated Saturday, the official said."
ReplyDeleteAl-Qaeda has nothing to fear from the questioning of these men, all the deprivation they received at the hands of the Americans, like not getting their customary orange juice with their continental breakfast sometimes, has made them implacable towers of silence.
If the objective is "Nation building" Iraq, at this point I'd vote "NO" it is not "worth it".
ReplyDeleteIf there is another objective, Mr Bush has never articulated it, regardless of the "Wink and Nods" that so many others thought were "signs from on high".
The Democray Project has definately run aground.
ReplyDeleteIt's never a good sign for a country when the Prime Minister and most of his Cabinet members spend their days barricaded in an Ottoman-era compound. That's what Fouad Siniora and Lebanon's other top officials have done since Nov. 21, when gunmen assassinated Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel in broad daylight.
Siniora's worries go beyond his personal safety. With Lebanon still trying to recover from last summer's 34-day war between Israel and the Shi'ite militant group Hizballah, the government has seen its authority undermined, renewed meddling from the country's neighbors and the growing assertiveness of Hizballah. Organized by Hizballah and its allies, about 800,000 protesters—a rather grand figure in a country of just 3.8 million—gathered in the center of Beirut last Friday to demand the resignation of Siniora. At the time, Lebanon's leader was in his barracks, surrounded by machine guns and barbed wire. from Time.
Now Mr Fred Barnes tells us how Mr Bush can abstain from Lame Duck status.
ReplyDeleteMoxie in the Executive
1. Fire generals
2. Keep John Bolton as American ambassador to the United Nations.
3. Stop earmarks.
4. Give judicial nominees recess appointments.
5. Talk up the military option in Iran.
6. Apply the Kennedy model to North Korea.
7. Push a radical energy independence plan.
8. A final gift to the world. As Bush is leaving office in January 2009, he could implement the military option and take out all of Iran's nuclear facilities
To implement any or all of these 8 points, outlined more fully by Mr Barnes, would take more cajones than Mr Bush has displayed, of late. One can hope for a positive turn of events, but the trend lines indicate that no such turn is in the works.
Re: Barnes recommendations for Bolton and recess appointments, Robert Novak writes:
ReplyDeleteWASHINGTON -- Sen. Harry Reid, leading the Senate's new Democratic majority, is framing next year's schedule in a way that will make it difficult, if not impossible, for President Bush to give recess appointments to nominees blocked for confirmation.
Reid's schedule limits Senate recesses to one week. Recess appointments usually are made only when Congress has been out of session for at least 10 days. That may kill any consideration of trying to seat federal appeals court judges whose nominations had been stalled even in the Republican-controlled Senate. The downside may be a rebellion by senators if their breaks are held to one week.
This seems like a Reasonable assessment of Ramadi.
ReplyDeleteIf you can beat'em there, you can beat'em, Anywhere. Ramadi, Ramadi
desert rat 11:51 am
ReplyDelete"To implement any or all of these 8 points, outlined more fully by Mr Barnes, would take more cajones than Mr Bush has displayed, of late. One can hope for a positive turn of events, but the trend lines indicate that no such turn is in the works."
Unfortunately, I must agree... however, perhaps the past six years combined with the results of 2006 will disabuse the man of any illusion of being able to New Tone his way through the next two years...
Thinking apprehensively, specifically WRT #8, if he waits until 2009, the mullahs might already have a few working fission devices on-hand... I vote for a strike much sooner... hell, if it needs doin', and I think it needs doin', then do it when it'll actually hurt'em... and since he'll be accused of playing politics by those Jedi Masters of playing politics (Dems), then he may as well time it for maximum effect WRT energizing the conservative base ahead of the next election cycle.
Imagine how unpopular the Dems would become trying to anal probe the administration at the same time the CIC is actually conducting himself like the BigSwingingD (taking out Iran's nuke capacity).
Triton,
ReplyDeleteIf Bush can say the Texas version of these words, he has a shot.
.."Presume not that I am the thing I was;
For God doth know, so shall the world perceive,
That I have turn'd away my former self;
So will I those that kept me company.
When thou dost hear I am as I have been,
Approach me, and thou shalt be as thou wast"...
I notice there are no "News" Stories Breathlessly proclaiming that casualties were down 50% Across the Board in November.
ReplyDeleteI got news for you, guys; we've done won this deal. The Iraqi army is getting more, and more, effective, and the Sheiks and Imams see the writing on the wall.
I'm with Rufus!
ReplyDeleteI'm with Rufus!
ReplyDeleteI'm with Rufus!
ReplyDeleteI was kinda hoping I'd get endorsed by somebody with "Tits."
ReplyDeleteC'mon, Anybody?
I'm with Rufus!
ReplyDeleteWoah - I'm with you Rufus but I didn't think I'd pick up these compatriots. Guess I've just been had by some prankster with more time on his/her hands than myself.
ReplyDeleteHere's something more OT:
Given the goals of what's been called 4th generation warfare, and that we can point to enemy capabilities specifically pursuing those goals, how do we distinguish between masterful propaganda and bad policy?
These information techniques used against us really has me worried that were having our minds changed for us.
I guess that was Kasparov's point - that we could not recognize a bad strategy.
ReplyDeleteWell, rufus, what is it we've "won" and who is "we"?
ReplyDeleteMr al-Sadr and Mr Hakim, are they included in the "we"?
If they are, then has not President Abracadbra won as well?
If they are not, then how can Mr Maliki and the Iraqi Government be considered to have "won"? As those two Iraqi patriots are representitive of the major components of the UIA ruling coalition in Iraq.
It seems you do not consider the Iraqi people to be part of "we", either
Record number die in Iraq during November
By THOMAS WAGNER
Associated Press
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Gunmen shot and killed a television comedian today who was famous for mocking everyone from the Iraqi government to U.S. forces to Shiite militias to Sunni insurgents.
Walid Hassan's slaying came as the Iraqi death toll rose to more than 1,300 for the first 20 days of November — the highest for any month since The Associated Press began tracking the figure in April 2005.
...
The Iraqi death toll this month is already well above the 1,216 who died in all of October, which had been the deadliest month in Iraq since the AP began its count.
So it must be obvious that the Haji do not count in your calculations, and you must consider Force Protection as the military's prime mission in Iraq, as that is your benchmark of Victory, aye?
THIS IS TOTALLY "AMAZING!"
ReplyDeleteWe knew that you could get 10 or 12 times More Biodiesel from an acre of Palm than you can from an acre of Soybeans; but, it turns out that you can, also, get as much or more ethanol from the waste than you can from an Acre of Sugar Cane!
If we remember the Iraqi comparison factor, 12, then let US compare.
ReplyDelete1,300 X 12 = 15,300 or almost four times the US 9-11 casualties. In a month.
Heck of a victory parade, all the way to the cemetary.
Give it up, Rat. I'm not taking any more "News" from the AP. My numbers come from the Brookings Institute - Iraq Index.
ReplyDeleteWe (us and the Iraqi Army) have killed a whole bunch of the bad guys in November. The AP indiscriminately heaps the insurgents in with the "Iraqis;" that's Bullshit, and just won't fly in my book.
What is thee number, rufus, of dead insurgents?
ReplyDeleteAs for Maliki, and Sadr, and Iran: I don't have a Crystal Ball, and neither do you. We don't have a clue as to how much weight the Mullahs will pull in Iraq. Personally, I don't care.
ReplyDeleteIf it's peaceful (kinda,) the oil is flowing, and Saddam's gone I'm happy.
If it's some sort of Democracy, that's "Bonus" Points.
Was that dead family, the daughter raped, killed and entire family butchered by GIs considered "civilian or insurgent"?
ReplyDeleteHow about those 20 some killed in Hadithia by the Marines, "Insurgent or Civilian", in your book?
The Insurgents have been deIraqisized? No longer Iraqis?
It is not "Peaceful" what a load of shit that staement is.
ReplyDeleteAgain how many Insurgents does Brookings say died in November. You did not link to it. so I wonder?
I don't have a clue, Rat; but, if you'll remember a couple of weeks ago the AP was "Screaming" about 112 Dead Iraqis IN ONE DAY, and it turned out that about 70 of them were dead insurgents.
ReplyDeleteI'll make you a bet; between Wednesday, and Thursday, there won't be more than ONE CAR BOMB, but next Saturday THERE WILL BE THREE!
What Hadji hasn't figured out yet, but the Sheiks have, is that THE ELECTION IS OVER. The MSM got the Dems elected; Now, no one gives a shit. The news cycle has passed them by.
Rat, I've linked the Brookings Institute - Iraq Index before. Just type it in on yahoo or google.
ReplyDeleteBTW, The Jury is still out on that Haditha engagement; I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't convict my Marines before it's proven they did anything wrong.
ReplyDelete15,300 that's a phony bunch of bullshit. "Casualty" numbers mean absolutely nothing. 80% go back to work the next day. A very, very small percentage of those are really "debilitating" injuries.
ReplyDeleteCase in Point: Just Yesterday, it seems the AP OVERREPORTED THE DEATHS BY 80 PERCENT!!
ReplyDeleteWere those killed, Insurgents or Civilians, that is the question. There is no doubt they were killed.
ReplyDeleteThey could well have been Civilians killed in a justifiable crossfire, so no Marine is convicted by me. But again were those folk civilian or insurgent?
I hear all the time about the Israeli "factor" how small a country it is and how casualties there must be seen in the "larger context" of their smaller base.
You mean to tell me that we should not "factor" for Iraq but only for Israel? Does not seem fair or equitable, to not use the same measures of comparison.
I looked to Brookings, ran the search, they do not have the numbers of Insurgents compared to Civilians available, in a simple site search.
So, please, reference your source documentation.
Rufus said, "What Hadji hasn't figured out yet, but the Sheiks have, is that THE ELECTION IS OVER. The MSM got the Dems elected; Now, no one gives a shit. The news cycle has passed them by."
ReplyDeleteWait until you see how much they don't give a shit about Mr. Bush's War when Mr. Bush is an ex-president.
It's pretty obvious Rat, that all of the "Dead Iraqi" reports we've been getting are Very Suspect.
ReplyDeleteBut, Frankly, My Dear, I Don't Give a Damn. Saddam's gone, the oil's safe, see'ya.
I'm much more interested, right now, in seeing how much Bush can get done on the "Orbital" Missile Defense Platform.
I'm much more interested in the Palm oil link I put up earlier, than I am in whether the insurgents blew up 30, or 60 dumbshits.
ReplyDeleteThe oil palm tree can be a boon to the world economy; Iraq never can.
In the next two years, rufus?
ReplyDeleteDoubt the palm trees will grow fasst enough to save the GOP, in '08. Only stability in Iraq will do that.
As to the orbital battle star, doubt it gets funded. Congress being what it is, now.
It is your basic operating style, though. When the news is bad, just say it does not matter.
That technique failed in November, big time. It'll fail next cycle, as well.
Tell me, how many acres have you got planned and financed for Palm production? How many acres, down on the Georgia farm are you committing to the project, yourself?
Or do we need to conquer Columbia to find the required hectres?
Rat, I will remind you that I, alone, published the "Primo" betting strategy for the election. If you skipped over it, I published several times "Take the 70-30 odds and bet the dems in the senate, and do likewise with the pubs in the house. It were a winnin strategery.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, 08' is way too far away for me to worry about; I'm politcked out.
I don't own a palm tree number one, dangit. We're a little too far north, anyway.
You're in Georgia, aren't you?
ReplyDeleteIf that is to far north, then where can we grow these palms, in the US, to achieve "energy independence"?
Or will we just be trading one supplier cartel for another?
Palm trees are water intense, as well, aren't they?
ReplyDeleteIf my health holds up I am intending on putting together a small company marketing micro-distilleries to local farmers.
ReplyDeleteWith the "Dam" breaking in the cellulosic arena, I figure I'm about a year, or so, away from getting serious.
That's if I can pry my ass out of this easy chair. It gets softer every day.
I live in N Mississippi, Rat. The Memphis area. You need to be within 20 Degrees of the Equator, more or less to grow oil palm. I don't believe you need "Monsoon" rainfall, just normal for that lattitude will do it.
ReplyDeleteWe can raise Scads of Ethanol in the U.S. The only hope we have for biodiesel would be a breakthrough in Algae, in which case everything else is "obsolete," anyway. I don't think Soy Diesel will Ever be financially feasible without Gummint subsidies.
We don't have to achieve "Energy Independence" to achieve "Energy Security."
ReplyDeleteThe Trick is to hold the Price of Oil Down! If you can hold the price down the Irans, Venezuelas, and Saudi Arabias of the world can't diddle around with the supply so much (and thus, manipulate price.)
Something to keep in mind: World Nominal GDP probably grew by at least 13% in the last two years, but DEMAND for oil remained, more or less, flat. Guess Why?
rufus's Brookings index did have this interesting article about how the US will end up destabilizing the entire Region as the belated flow of Iraqi refugees increases
ReplyDeleteIraqi Refugees: Carriers of Conflict
Regional Instability is coming, whether US wants it or not, unintended consequence or Master Plan?
The Brookings Index is interesting, but still no breakdown of civilians vs insurgents killed, but since Brookings is a reliable source, they put the foreign fighters, currently in Iraq, at between 800- 2,000.
The numbers of daily insurgent attacks does not look like it is related to US elections, steady upward trend line, to 180 attacks per day in Nov '06 from a base of 8 in Jun '03. (pg 22)
Iraqi income from oil exports drops 50% from October to November '06. (pg 30)
Now as to ciilians killed, Brookings data ends in August '06.
It's numbers are more than DOUBLE those cited by AP.
AP said 1,300 was the highest on their records, but Brookings says that Civilian deaths in Iraq in Jun=2,990 dead, Jul=3,405 dead, Aug=2,855 dead. All classified as CIVILIANS by Brookings.(page 10)
So your source, rufus, proves my point. The numbers of dead Iraqi civilians laid out by Brookings are HIGHER than those cited by AP.
Thanks for the help in proving me right.
rufus, how small a farm is economical?
ReplyDeleteRat, as I said before, "I don't give a flying fuck about "civilian" casualties." That's the Iraqi's problem. I care about U.S. Casualties, and getting the job done.
ReplyDeleteIf some sunnis blow up some shi'ites, and some shi'ites respond by offing a few sunnis, tough titty. I'm more interested in what I'll have for lunch, today.
That's why the US is losing, rufus, no one gives a shit about Mr Bush and his Policies to win the War.
ReplyDeleteEven his most ardent backers.
Again you prove my case.
Deuce, it depends on what crop you can raise. A lot of "Small" farmers have full-time jobs in town - especially in states like Ky and Tn.
ReplyDeleteIf you're depending on some scraggly old wheat land you'd better have a lot of it, but a man and a boy could make a decent living, I suppose, off of a thousand acres of Illinois corn acreage.
Is that what you meant?
It looks like with the coming ethanol boom that that man and boy could make it on 500 acres of decent corn land, providing the boy leaves the farm when he gets married.
ReplyDeleteIt is the distillery, duece, that is thhe profit center, not the farm. The relevent numbers are the capacity of the distillery, costs of the feed stock, operating costs and market value of the end product.
ReplyDeleteHow large the capacity of the still is paramount, if greater stocks were needed than one farm could produce, a farmer co-op could supply the stocks or buy the distilleries.
The co-op being an age old agricultural system.
That answered my question. Not practical for Northeastern farms.
ReplyDeleteDR, that makes sense.
ReplyDeleteDeuce, down in this area we raise a lot of cotton and beans. The dirt and weather just isn't good enough for Corn.
ReplyDeleteIn a few years we will be converting the bean and cotton stalks to ethanol. We won't be utilizing the Big Ethanol Refineries of the type that they're building up in Corn Country. We will need much smaller units that will service a four or five mile radius.
I envision the larger farmer in the area setting up one of these and serving his own needs and those of the smaller farmers in his immediate vicinity. As I said, we're still a couple of years down the road.
When I was stationed at Keesler, I dated a girl from Meridian. I know the country side up that way.
ReplyDeleteNot necessarily, Deuce; The new Broin/Voyager refinery that I posted on changes EVERYTHING. Cellulosic technology (which is, really, all about "enzymes") will make Marginal land very profitable. It will, also, make smaller patches of land profitable.
ReplyDeleteBTW, it's figured that NY has at least 3 Million acres of pretty good corn land lying dormant. You can bet there's that much or more Marginal land lying fallow, as well. And, that's just in NY.
When you get into the South/Mid-South it's the Dominant Farmer (4 or 5 thousand acres) in the community, not the CO-OP that is the Driving Force. He'll be the one to lead the Parade.
ReplyDeletewhat is the value of those acres, in the midsouth, rufus?
ReplyDeleteThe dominant farm is 4-5000 acres is valued at $?, per acre or overall.
Hey, Rat!
ReplyDeleteDon't knock not giving a shit about Iraqi Civilians:
Bush don't give a shit about American Citizens, so it is a "Coherent Strategy."
Symbiotic even.
Hell all the killed and wounded from non-licensed, non-insured illegals W just calls Road Kill.
---
The best way to win a war is SAY you did, I say.
Next time we'll just say we won and never leave CONUS.
That'll work until their ain't no CONUS.
For the Palm Deal, just Bulldoze Honolulu-Wakiki-Pearl and plant palms!
ReplyDeleteProblem solved.
3,000 dead/month = 36,000/yr
ReplyDelete20 million vs 300 million USA:
15 TIMES LARGER = 540,000/year.
THAT is fuckin PEACEFUL, 'Rat:
War OVER.
We Won!
(plus a thousand a month hauling ass out of the peaceful paradise)
Hope the Dentists and their families make it.
So every YEAR they are losing what we lost in all of WWII.
ReplyDelete...not counting refugees.
ReplyDeleteTHAT's what I call SUCCESS!
If Clinton were President, they'd be calling for his impeachment, but that's another story, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteRat, a 4,000 acre farm, down here, is going to have, generally, a wide variety of types of dirt. You would probably (I'm doing some pretty strong guessing) be looking at anywhere from Five to Seven Million?
ReplyDeleteThe factor is 12, not 15, doug, the Iraqi base population is 25 million, they say.
ReplyDeleteProportionality, that only is applicable to Israel, not Iraq.
In Iraq we must make direct comparisons, or one 9-11 per month, every month, without a factor or proportionality, at all.
But do not worry, it does not matter. We will win their hearts and minds, regardless of the death toll.
The Brookings Index shows oil sales from Iraq dropping like a rock, in just the last month, 50% decline.
$7 million USD for the land.
ReplyDelete$3 million USD for the still.
650 gallons of palm bio diesel per acre per year - 2,600,000 gallons for the farm
$2 per gallon retail for the product or a $5 million gross per year.
Minus operating expenses of farming and distilling and delivery.
Minus time value of the $10 Million USD, $700,000 per year.
Pretty thin deal for the capitialization.
Rat, I don't know what you're looking at, but that's not correct.
ReplyDeleteIt shows oil exports dropping a minute amount from 1.52 million barrels/day to 1.47 mbd.
Boy, Rat, There's a whole hell of a lot of farmers that farm for a hell of a lot less than that.
ReplyDeletePage 30, rufus, revenues:
ReplyDeleteOctober $2.45 Billion
November $1.26 Billion
It's not volume, rufus, but revenues that really count.
Must be why I'd not be a farmer.
ReplyDeleteIf those kinds of margins on capitialization are considered "good".
I do know folks with feed stores, rufus, that make less on their labor and buildings and land then they would if they just rented their buildings and land at market value for other uses.
ReplyDeleteWell, hell, the price of oil dropped from $78.00 barrel to $58.00 barrel, good for us, bad for them - Yea Us.
ReplyDeleteDon't overlook that the land is an "Appreciating Asset," Rat.
BTW, you ask any farmer how long he's going to farm, and he'll tell you, "Until I go Broke." That's just the way farmers are.
Heck, half the farmers in America farm their farms for less than they'd get in "Cash" Rent.
ReplyDeletePerhaps the land appreciates, perhaps not.
ReplyDeleteIn my neck of the woods we had appreciation well above the historic norm, 45% in three years.
Should have been no more than 20%, a 25% correction is due, over the next three years, just to get even.
The effects are being seen, even today. Homes sales stagnaated, but prices remained high. Now sales have increased but prices are falling. One fellow I know has a family owned construction company. They have 700 houses in inventory, and not selling them, though they would if they could. Fulton Homes bought up a lot of Phoenix Metro farm land, in the past. They've put a hold on further purchases.
Not all that clever then, the American farmer.
ReplyDeleteEven, "Pure" farm land is volatile. When Beans hit $14.00 back in the seventies all the "Young" farmers were going out and paying 17% interest to buy farmland and new John Deeres. Mediocre farm land went from $600.00/acre to over $2,000.00 in a heartbeat. Then the Germans showed up and started buying. You had to know at that point the party was over. And it Was.
ReplyDeleteThe next year it was all "Farm-Aid Concerts."
Smart as a "Whip," Rat; but with a "Gamblin Streak" a Mile Wide, and just as Deep.
ReplyDeleteDoug said, "If Clinton were President, they'd be calling for his impeachment, but that's another story, isn't it?"
ReplyDelete"The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people." -- Bill Clinton, May 28, 1993, from a speech at Philadelphia city hall.
The land don't talk back. That's a definite asset.
ReplyDelete