COLLECTIVE MADNESS


“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."

Friday, September 15, 2006

The Oracle in a Whirlwind

Orianna Fallaci has died and we are left with a memory of a flashing image of an oracle in a whirlwind. For some of us, she was an oracle briefly appearing in a nightmarish maelstrom to deliver an ominous warning of danger. She tried to warn a decadent, distracted West of the impending dangers of Islam. For her bravery, her native country rewarded her with the threat of prosecution for the act of “vilifying” a religion. In her final days she defied Italian authorities and died in her Italy.

Pope Benedict XVI this week quoted from a book recounting a conversation between 14th century Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II and a Persian scholar on the truths of Christianity and Islam.

"The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war," the pope said. "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.'"
According to Salih Kapusuz, a deputy leader of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's party, the Pope “…is going down in history in the same category as leaders such as (Adolf) Hitler and (Benito) Mussolini." Muslims are outraged and their leaders are demanding an apology.

George Bush and Tony Blair have attempted many times since 9/11 to warn of the Islamist peril and to prepare their nations for the long commitment towards defeating a 7th century ideology. For their efforts, Fallaci, Bush, Blair, and the Pope have suffered the blows and arrows of mockery and scorn. Sadly, their enemies have been not only the Islamist jihadis around the world but also their own people.

The decadent west only wants to hear that which tickles its' ears and will probably ignore Pat Buchanan’s latest warning:

“Every American must hope that Bush's goals, an Afghanistan and an Iraq that are democratic, pro-American and enlisted in the cause of fighting terror, are attained. But we have reached a point where rhetoric must be set aside and realities faced: We face a real prospect of defeat in both wars.”
Buchanan warns us that a premature US withdrawal form Iraq potentially could result in:

“The breakup of Iraq, a Shia-Sunni bloodbath spreading across the Middle East, the massacre of the men and women who cast their lot with America, a Turkish invasion of Kurdistan, an Islamic perception the United States had been routed and a Shia-dominated Iraq under the influence of Iran. This would be a strategic disaster that would demoralize our few remaining friends in the region and embolden our enemies. It would be a victory for bin Laden, al-Qaida and Islamists greater than the expulsion of the Soviet Union from Afghanistan.”
He writes that come November, with regard to Iraq and Afghanistan, we must decide among three options:

“Put in more U.S. troops and go all-out for the victory of which President Bush speaks. Stay the course, which holds no promise of victory or of any early end to either war. Begin the withdrawal of U.S. forces, and accept the consequences, which could well be what the president warns -- calamitous.”
In fairness, this is not the kind of news that anyone, other than the terrorists, wants to hear. Nor do we want to hear Buchanan’s foreshadowing words,

“The decision is up to Bush and the new Congress, but also to us. No matter which decision we make, Americans are headed for a long, dark night of recriminations not unlike the Truman-McCarthy era.”
We are in for a long dark night of nightmares and surreal days when our only choices will be between the bad and the horrid. And yet, we mock and scorn our secular, political and religious leaders who try to guide us through the maelstrom.

To what end?

And in those days, there was no King and every man did what was right in his own eyes.

223 comments:

  1. Habu1 said...
    The President looked and sounded resolute. McCain and Warner should be feel'n some heat from their base.Let's hope so.

    The subtext, actually it's practically the nexis of this entire problem is having the USA work within organizations and conventions that are manifestly unable to cope with a post Cold War environment.
    For the US citizen to believe that he or she must subordinate our Constitution to transient and lesser documents is an abomination.
    The Geneva Conventions date to 1859 with periodic protocols added, but influenced by nations with no history of democracy close to the United States or no history of democracy period.(ask any current resident of Abu G. who he'd like in charge) That Convention is not followed by most of the warring nations of this world and to hold us up to it is an insult to our entire history of moving mankind forward, with greater freedoms that ever in history.
    Similarly the United Nations is clearly venal and corrupt. It's usefulness is now simply to have the United States pay the freight to be insulted.
    This nations performed quite well dealing unilaterally with one nation at a time and should do so again, abandoning an organization as diaphanously meretricious as the UN.
    We do ourselves and the world no favors by supporting these two relics. Leadership requires us to do this or forfeit our own rights.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the matter of the Geneva Convention and attached protocols it clearly states that ALL SIGNATORY STATES...STATES...STATES.

    When I point to this flaccid convention as being superceded by history the above is partitally what I refer to. Terrorist organizations are not STATES, unless lunacy and anarchy are parsed into STATES by lawyers.
    Yet the United States is being villified for adhering to not only the letter but the spirit of the convention, while proxy terrorists are being included in the definition of STATES.
    We are fully within our rights to treat an enemy with no country, no treaties, no obligations to free nations ANY WAY WE CHOOSE.
    Our continued mistake short of dissolving our membership is to fulfill the Bush Doctrine and attack Iran and Syria, both states who harbor terrorists. If it is not possible to do so with conventional arms then we have no choice other than to go nuclear to enforce our rights and freedoms, for Iran and Syria are STATES and are therefore accountable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Put me down with that first post.
    habu what is that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I reccomend this westhawk analysis. As usual those guys mirror my view of things, and they have a big word count to explain it.

    They base their piece around MSNBC reprint of a WaPo piece.
    In Anbar province, U.S. military takes two paths
    Regular military, Special Forces teams take divergent approaches to war

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here comes the SR-71 story.
    Better buy a round, this could take a while.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If Oriana had been a terrorist our MSM would be demanding we send a delegation to the funeral and t-shirt and poster companies would already be backlogged.

    ReplyDelete
  7. B1 Bob says it is no longer three countries in the Axis of Evil, but forty.
    They're all down at the Beach Party in Havana.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dr. Rice on Limbaugh's show this morning.

    Rush: (same question posed many times by many poster here, ie, why is Israel subject to timelines and artificially imposed "Peace" Agreements, when that is not the case for any other nation?
    ---
    SECRETARY OF STATE RICE:
    " Well, I would think of it a little differently, Rush.
    What you have there is a Lebanese government that wants to fight terror and is the beginning of a democratic government that could be actually a partner for Israel in fighting terror, and so the ceasefire was really with the Lebanese government, and now we're trying to help the Lebanese government deal with the effects of a Hezbollah that launched that attack without Lebanon even knowing.
    I think of it the following way...
    "
    ---
    TRANSCRIPT, Rice Interview
    Anybody else find this slightly less than reassuring?

    ReplyDelete
  9. 4:13:23 PM - What's an "SR-71"?
    ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Damn, I was hoping after the latest abortion of a Supreme Court Ruling that wiser heads would realise that the Geneva Conventions must be rewritten ."
    We be dumbing everything down to comport with latest NEA product, and to bring Multiculturalism to the land of the Dead White Man.

    ReplyDelete
  11. DR...good article over at Westhawk..you've got me going over there almost daily to see what's what..one paragraph caught my eye that seems so true..

    "Whether planned by the generals or not, the U.S. command may have hedged its bets in Iraq. We have expressed our doubts about whether the U.S. will be able to remake Iraq into a functioning republic before the patience of the American people is exhausted. It seems too great a leap for Iraqi politics to make"

    I'd say we've asked them to jump across the Grand Canyon in one leap.

    ReplyDelete
  12. He was just a common Soldier,
    And his ranks are growing thin,
    But his presence should remind us
    We may need his like again.

    For when countries are in conflict,
    Then we find the Soldier's part
    Is to clean up all the troubles
    That the politicians start.

    If we cannot do him honor
    While he's here to hear the praise,
    Then at least let's give him homage
    At the ending of his days.

    Perhaps just a simple headline
    in a paper that would say:
    "OUR COUNTRY IS IN MOURNING,
    FOR A SOLDIER DIED TODAY."

    ReplyDelete
  13. attribute to I can't remember

    ReplyDelete
  14. great post, whit. clean, pointed, and resonant.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Even though this was printed in the NYTimes, "The Right Troops in the Right Places" written by Seth Moulton, who was a Marine infantry officer in Iraq from March to September 2003 and from July 2004 to October 2005.

    ReplyDelete
  16. whit,

    I appreciate the tribute Ms. Fallaci. Thank you.

    Ms. Fallaci could name the enemy of the West, as can the Pope. Can the same be said for either of the administrations of the US or UK. I think not. And that is why we are now in the swamp.

    ReplyDelete
  17. BTW, OT & Mea culpa Ariana,

    Another ROE issue. I closely paraphrase. Joe Biden just said to Wolf on CNN that he's worked with these professionals for 30 years (10 on the IntelCom), and he says we don't need to pass the legislation that Bush requests, because these guys always act professionally, and if a situation exists (read emergency), where extraordinary measures may be required, then he knows these professionals will just do what they need to, and throw themselves under the train.
    He just said that.

    I wonder what that known-unknown level of "threat" has on the quality and quantity of the information collection efforts.

    ReplyDelete
  18. geoffgo,
    That's Exactly What McCain says:
    He won't put it in his bill, but he expects the canon fodder to do the right thing, come what may.
    Rather Blatant Display of Just What Kind of Worthless B...... they are.

    ReplyDelete
  19. His email address is available at his blog, ask him that knows, not us.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'd still post there, too, if ever I had an original or not crashingly obvious thought, anymore. But I don't. I'm news-numb. So this place fits better for shoot-de-breeze.

    ReplyDelete
  21. who wants an F-22 when ya can have an F-35?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I've dropped a couple, but there is not much cause.

    It's either read how Islam has died and just does not know it, or that we should not torture a turd to save a city.
    Knowing full well that torture is then defined down to being comparable to a stay in Sheriff Joe's "Tent City".

    ReplyDelete
  23. You're right--turning ourselves inside over a question that a mature nation under these circumstances would not even be discussing aloud, is in itself a huge victory for the dark side. Regardless of the official outcome, we are demonstrating wanna-be-suicidal idiocy. Demonstrating it, reveling in it, smearing it all over our face and grinning like an idiot child with an melting ice cream cone.

    ReplyDelete
  24. That F-35 is one ugly aircraft. I mean would you want one in your driveway?

    ReplyDelete
  25. But it went up against two 1974 Pinto's, a Yugo, and a Hummer II with bling bling and defeated them all

    ReplyDelete
  26. desert rat; 4:11:31 PM

    Great stuff. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Now that you mention it, it *is* sorta smash-faced lookin.

    ReplyDelete
  28. CIA asks for 'legal clarity' on torture
    CIA director Michael Hayden said overnight he needed to know with greater clarity what is lawful under the Geneva Conventions for interrogations of key Al Oueda...
    CIA director may be flexible on detainee legislation
    U.S. News & World Report

    ReplyDelete
  29. yeh--the capabilities are sorta 23rd century.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Habu,
    In how many theaters, er Countries were the Pintos, Yugos, and etc located?

    ReplyDelete
  31. DR..I think it can go verticle from where it sits so it would fit in a driveway of less than 5,000 ft. You neighbors might have to replace a few windows but hey

    ReplyDelete
  32. Son the pilot sez planes fly like they look. But I think this one is a new paradigm.

    ReplyDelete
  33. We need weapons appropriate for our enemies:
    Bring back the Catapult.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Tell him I need a ride when he's in the area.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Now compared to the sr-71........no wait ,hey come back ...NO HONEST

    car engines starting,people rushing toward the exits

    "but the sr-71,,,WAIT...WAit UP

    ReplyDelete
  36. We should start launching hot rocks and chains off the decks of our carriers:
    Use existing equipment.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I bought a some- assembly-required Yugo kit. It was called the "Yugo Screw Yourself" kit.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I was not thinking of take offs, but landing it after a night on the town. May need all the space I could get.

    Still like A-10's and Spectre, bestest.

    ReplyDelete
  39. doug, should i just tell him to look for the ugly feller?

    ReplyDelete
  40. ...one old Gomez in the corner I'll get him .....

    hey ..hey....HEY i gotta neat airplane story to tell.

    No habla ingles..

    GREAT he'll listen, no interruptions either

    ReplyDelete
  41. I lose the evolution--Spooky, Puff, Spectre--

    ReplyDelete
  42. ....and then it landed perfectly.


    THE END

    ReplyDelete
  43. what were the names on "our gang?"

    ReplyDelete
  44. The new model has some sort of self-correcting aiming sitiation.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Spooky-wheat,SPectre-wheat, Puff-wheat

    ReplyDelete
  46. Kareem Abdul Jabbar's kid

    Cream 'o Wheat

    ReplyDelete
  47. ...and THAT, people, is the story of SR-71. Any questions? People? Hey, lights! People? People?

    ReplyDelete
  48. does this F-35 run on jp-4 or mazzola oil,ethanol,or old watermelllon rinds?

    ReplyDelete
  49. The Nazis used coal oil in their jets.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Methane, habu, piped directly from the flight suit

    ReplyDelete
  51. By its own admission, the US military has some high hurdles to run in a hurry, but think about this:

    National defense as social welfare
    http://www.tigerhawk.blogspot.
    com/

    “A new report commissioned by the European Parliament's security and defence subcommittee estimates that although EU governments spend half (€250bn) the amount Americans spend on defence, their defence capacities are only about 10 percent as efficient as the US.”

    ReplyDelete
  52. heard that from Al Goring himself.

    ReplyDelete
  53. this aircraft is so good that over 68% of the House and 93% of the Senate are getting kickbacks ..mostly stamps they can turn in for money..no one will ever figure it out ..honest graft

    ReplyDelete
  54. DR..did you say flight suit or fart suit?

    ReplyDelete
  55. you see the size of those bird inlets

    ReplyDelete
  56. fart suit: Your Honor, my client has incurred permanent nasal dismay, due to that...

    ReplyDelete
  57. i'll bet one of those babies could really flock you up

    ReplyDelete
  58. yes your honor he was tramatized. he thought he would only have to fly on weekends

    ReplyDelete
  59. wonder if puns ever get so bad that they cause murder? have to ask doug, he's probably ducked some bullets.

    ReplyDelete
  60. If you want to insult with panache,
    Horsey names can quite often sound brash.
    Forget donkey or mule;
    Don't try jackass; it's cruel.
    Drawl out a-si-nine.

    You'll make a splash.

    ReplyDelete
  61. ducked some bullets...that's fowl

    ReplyDelete
  62. seriously ..how do they ever talk guys into driving tanks these days..they got PVC potato guns that'll take 'em

    ReplyDelete
  63. Where are the Nagainas and assorted norns, crones, and valkyries?

    ReplyDelete
  64. How long did it take, habu, to refuel that Blackbird?

    ReplyDelete
  65. I think a lotta the shock and fussin an fighting coming out out of IDF right now, is due to the quantity and quality of those friggin Russian anti-tank weapons.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I have no recollection of any Blackbird Senator....


    but it leaked like an old man...fuel big time dripping from the tanks while it was on the ground

    ReplyDelete
  67. built that way so that when it heated uo the metal would expand and stop the leaks..sucker got hot go'in so fast

    ReplyDelete
  68. nagainas, that's the cause of many a punt.

    ReplyDelete
  69. i think it got about 2 mpg..mid air refuels like crazy..very touchy

    ReplyDelete
  70. My best nonPublic source told me, buddy, that the Mossad had fixated on the "Far Enemy". That their eyes and hit teams traveled far afield eliminating threats.
    They did not spend much time monitoring that 3km zone north of the Blue Line.
    Perhaps that was the IDF's responsibility, I don't know. But heads are going to keep rolling, or so it appears.

    ReplyDelete
  71. 80,000ft ceiling, Mach 4, and 60s technology. sheeeeit.

    ReplyDelete
  72. higher
    faster

    actually the Oxcart CIA A-12 was faster than the SR

    ReplyDelete
  73. Well, go on, tell that fella the story, he bought the round.

    I gonna go take a leak

    ReplyDelete
  74. You know, rat, the same thing played in the Yom Kippur war--IDF armor taking more losses than expected from the same class weapon--there may not BE a solution to it.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Kelly Johnson was a true genius..he would walk through the big assembly bays and a hush would come over the place .. a true legend

    ReplyDelete
  76. i dunno, rufus--*something* i hope.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Buddy I don't have any idea..i'd guess the've gone to RPV's that are so fast a pilot couldn't take the stress...the sr would ring guys out pretty good.

    plus i can't even imagine how good our satillites must be now..my time was 20+ years ago and it was fucking incredible then

    ReplyDelete
  78. Zero defects is hard enough in normal life, but on a battle field...

    I never thought the Israeli going into Lebanon was a good idea, there are varied views of the short term outcome.

    Another proxy stalemate, with each side claiming a measure of success. Seems to me.

    ReplyDelete
  79. not after all that hair-transplant expense--wot a waste.

    ReplyDelete
  80. good point rufus


    interidavisability with snow erp or jagger emminations

    ReplyDelete
  81. ..here son join the armor ..where every combat unit can take you out, but if they are stupid A-rabs you can really create havoc.........'cuse me sir can i have the keys to that A-10 over there instead

    ReplyDelete
  82. all in all the beginning of "Top Gun" was good, music,photog,etc..good start

    ReplyDelete
  83. No son, that bird is obsolete.

    We're pressed for equipment, here take this M113 and get it painted desert tan.

    It'll runs on oil from the Carter's peanut ranch.

    ReplyDelete
  84. This is precisely the sort of moral cowardice which infuriated Ms. Fallaci. Let us hope the Bush administration will reevaluate its rules-of-engagement.

    Now This Is Surrender
    http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/

    “Pervez Musharraf has released thousands of Taliban fighters…”

    “[T]housands of foreign fighters detained by Pakistan after fleeing the battleground in Afghanistan have been quietly released and allowed to return to their home countries.”

    "We have repeatedly warned Pakistan over arresting and then releasing suspects," said a US diplomat in Islamabad. "We are monitoring their response with great concern." (Man, that’s going to leave a mark!)

    ReplyDelete
  85. Son sez an ordinary joe passes out at 3 g's, but today's top guys are trained to "9 g's for at least 30 seconds" (tho a minute is common goal). The airframes can always do much more.

    ReplyDelete
  86. yeah snow erp and jagger emminations ..usually retarded by the trans-v-kon ossilation of the lazy boy recliner

    ReplyDelete
  87. i see the f-14 is gone to the wearhouse

    ReplyDelete
  88. Ding! Dong!

    Is that Avon calling?

    Nag! Nag!

    Who's there?

    ReplyDelete
  89. 9 g's and all done with epoxy glued wings

    ReplyDelete
  90. Those Pakis are goin' to the next step, allen.
    They will no longer arrest Taliban fighters, thereby solving the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  91. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  92. SB 71 Fact SheetCalifornia Comprehensive Sexual Health Education LAW• SB 71 requires that instruction and materials shall teach respect for committed relationships as well as marriage. It removes all reference to “abstinence until marriage” to reflect that, if today's laws remain the same, not all students will have the right to marry their chosen life partner. • Sex education instruction and materials may not teach or promote religious doctrine or reflect or promote bias against any person on the basis of any category protected by the state’s school nondiscrimination policy, Education Code Section 220, which includes actual or perceived gender and sexual orientation.• Previous law required classes to discuss abstinence from sexual intercourse, a heterosexual focus that excluded LGBT youth. SB 71 changed the language to make it more inclusive.

    ReplyDelete
  93. i wonder how much shut eye Musharref gets?

    ReplyDelete
  94. At least as much as Osama, I wager.

    ReplyDelete
  95. doug does it have a picture of putting a condum ona banana

    ReplyDelete
  96. anything about five butt ups a day?

    ReplyDelete
  97. Been sayin' that for a while, rufus. Not 'cause I llike it, but to me, it's been plain as the nose on an F35

    ReplyDelete
  98. B-70 cont.
    Films taken of the incident seemed to show that Walker's F-104N had gotten too close to the XB-70A's wing during the formation and the vortex generated by the wingtip had pulled the smaller aircraft upward and into the wing of the larger one, shearing off the starboard rudder of the XB-70A in the process.
    ---
    The aircraft was to achieve the required Mach 3 cruising speed by using "compression lift"--a technique in which an aircraft could use its own supersonic shock wave for lift and hence reduce the aerodynamic drag and increase the range. In order to incorporate compression lift, the outer wing panels folded downward as a unit to trap the shock wave, generating high-pressure air directly underneath the wing surface. The maximum downward anhedral angle achieved by the panels was 65 degrees. There were a series of elevons on the trailing edge of the delta wing. The outboard elevons extended into the outer wing panel, and were disengaged when the outer panels were folded downward

    ReplyDelete
  99. so if this muslim guy gets elected to congress will we have to do the Pledge in Arabic, write all the bill in arabic and put him on appropriations and intelligence committes

    ReplyDelete
  100. oh yeah the tread...Oriana, R.I.P. and a job well done

    ReplyDelete
  101. Powerline has been all over that Muslim guy in 20 different posts.

    Attended rallies where they cheered on a Cop-Killer with:
    "No Justice, No Peace"
    Bald face lies about how long he's been affiliated w/Nation of Islam.

    Took 15k from Terrorist supporters.
    Loved by CAIR.

    He's sposed to be a shoe in in his little commie neighborhood.

    ReplyDelete
  102. pix of XB-70.

    see side-by-side pic (near top) of B-29 next to B-36.

    (sorry, o/t)

    ReplyDelete
  103. XB-70 "Valkyrie"
    I had to have one, so I built an all-balsa flying model w/a TD-049 in the tail!

    ReplyDelete
  104. wonder if President Carter is in Habana, Coober, for de big Party party?

    ReplyDelete
  105. The question Senator Mccain is..

    "Is the terrorist better off with your legislation or the presidents?"

    ReplyDelete
  106. Well, I'm against Human Unhappiness. I'm taking a stand, and I condemn all those who will not stand with me. There is NO EXCUSE for Human Unhappiness.

    ReplyDelete
  107. habu1,

    Is it even possible to be off-topic here?

    ReplyDelete
  108. trish; 8:49:43 PM

    re: No prisoners, no problem.

    What a great segue into the Taliban mourner's parade.

    Did you hear the report that Senior Airman Ulack pulled the plug on the shot? Yeah, the theatre commander was all for it, but Ulack nixed it. Word has it that Ulack is the most powerful man in the Air Force, maybe even the world. Generals tremble at the sound of his falsetto squeak.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Is anti-unhap identical to pro-hap?

    ReplyDelete
  110. just redefine terrorism as tourism ..somehow I see John Lennon supporting that with a hit song 9back when he was above ambient temp

    ReplyDelete
  111. all of the threads here are multi hued and loosely woven

    ReplyDelete
  112. Is being anti-off-topic identical to being pro-on-topic? Or is that pro-anti-off-topic or anti-anti-pro-on-topic. Or...whatever.

    Who will first invoke a two or three post rule, which Ms. T will NEVER violate?

    ReplyDelete
  113. welcome ruins

    all topics,all the time

    you throw out the bait maybe ya get a hit maybe not, but the drinks are free, there's always a fresh urinal cake in the mens room and the ladies are beyond cool

    ReplyDelete
  114. Allen,

    If you torture, I torture.

    ReplyDelete
  115. i don't know but i do know that Buddy is right Unhapppiness and Human misery are B.A.D.

    let Jimma testify

    ReplyDelete
  116. actually allen it comes in a topical or creme rinse

    ReplyDelete
  117. so if i'm a terrorist after hearing mccain i actually want to come to america..don't i

    ReplyDelete
  118. oops NSA,FBI,CIA all on the phone now

    ReplyDelete
  119. What could be more natural than E. Coli?

    ReplyDelete
  120. DR..whats you altitude up in the mountains?

    ReplyDelete
  121. ruins; 9:04:56 PM

    Welcome to the cabaret, old sot.

    And please, if you are one of the distaff, no disparagement of your genius was intended. Doubtless, you are the most ravishingly beautiful, congenial (though thoroughly misunderstood by significant other), feeling, gift to G-d's green earth (unless you are offended by green, in which case, I LOVE any color you LOVE.)

    If you are a guy, have a beer on me (stogies are free for the asking) and feel free to talk about goats, but please, never mention the IQs of sheep.

    ReplyDelete
  122. does the EB have a bowling teamand if so what place are we in

    ReplyDelete
  123. The one-L lama, he's a priest
    The two-L llama, he's a beast
    And I would bet a silk pajama
    There isn't any three-L lllama

    (Ogden Nash)

    ReplyDelete
  124. Buddy,

    I'll take E-coli for $500.13

    "what is a natural affliction that sounds like an Italian desert"

    correct ,you still have the broad.
    "i'll take the blue dress for $400"
    "what should Monica have dry cleaned"

    ReplyDelete
  125. can an rpv pilot pull 9 g's?

    ReplyDelete
  126. You're close to town
    And you couldn't tarry
    Suddenly you realise your really hairy
    Burma Shave

    ReplyDelete
  127. Does your lady
    Misbehave
    Grunt and grumble
    Rant and rave?
    Tame that bull with
    Burma Shave!

    ReplyDelete
  128. Dear Dr. Trish,

    While working in the yard the other day, I had the feeling I was being watched by generals. When I looked more closely, however, I found that squirrels were closely observing me. Rather than being relieved, I became concerned about the tiny, shiny silver stars on their little shoulders. What does this mean?

    Later in the day, I composed a list of 100 generals I have or do respect. Will you find me wanting when I tell you that none of them were on your list? Please, don't be judgmental, like my Scotch, I like my generals straight.

    ReplyDelete
  129. I wish I could write like Ogden

    (spin verses whenever I'm logged-in);

    but always my words,
    they comes out absurds,

    Not sunny, like Nash's,
    but fogged in.

    ReplyDelete
  130. hog den dog den, i got a million of 'em, take my exwife, PLEASE

    ReplyDelete
  131. ruins,

    re: staff

    Give as good as ye get is all we ask. Feel free to drink yourself under the bar, but watch Rufus, I've heard rumors.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Allen,
    We'll give a chance to revise that last bit....

    I like my generals straight.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Why has Allen Composted 100 Squirrels?

    ReplyDelete
  134. gettin kinda "Springtime for the Fuehrer" around here.

    ReplyDelete
  135. habu1,

    re: straight generals

    OK, I take your point. How about, "Like my Scotch, I like my generals to grate?"

    ReplyDelete
  136. You're fly'in high
    You're on the double
    But the lady says you got some trouble.
    "I don't make men with real bad stubble"
    Burma Shave

    ReplyDelete
  137. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  138. You're in the Mosque
    with your butt in the air
    when the burka behind you says
    man you got hair,
    Burma Shave

    ReplyDelete
  139. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Hey, pal, move yer feet,
    I got my prayer schedule to meet

    ReplyDelete
  141. Oriana Fallaci isn't that in the Kama Sutra?

    ReplyDelete
  142. cold man cold ..you get a time out for that ..go play Pong

    ReplyDelete
  143. What did Oral Roberts Swallow?

    ReplyDelete
  144. ok, rufus, i'll delete it. it was crude, you right.

    ReplyDelete
  145. P-Tater says Hi..he's been "under the weather" after a cavort with an out of county she-tater who left a calling card.
    Now he's ashamed to see mZ Possum"Honey"Tater..at least for the next few days

    ReplyDelete
  146. I most certainly did not compost; I composed and saluted smartly, just like Trish!

    She probably thinks former Major General Fiscus is a regular Curtis Lemay.

    Facts are troublesome things, especially for fools.

    ReplyDelete
  147. I just shaved my private parts, Allah Atta.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Been Democrat so long everything looks like up to me.

    ReplyDelete
  149. This is a real blow to the multi-culti-true believers:

    Mahathir Mohamad: "There is No Such Thing As a Moderate Muslim”
    http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

    Mahathir Mohamad is a former Malaysian Prime Minister.

    ReplyDelete
  150. kind of a neat fantasy--Pelosi/Conyers. we could all just stay drunk, mess up our pants, flop down in the street, renege all contracts, just go on and go to hell, what the hell.

    ReplyDelete
  151. What does it mean when Jonah Goldberg at NRO speaks heresy?

    Governing Realities
    Where are the conservatives?
    http://author.nationalreview.com/latest/?q=MjE5NQ==

    “I can’t quite hope the Democrats win. But I can’t bring myself to say I’d like more of the same either. As Henry Kissinger said in 1986 of the Iran-Iraq war: Too bad they can’t both lose.”



    What does it mean when Professor Bainbridge speaks heresy?

    Hewitt's advice
    http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2006/08/hewitts_advice.html

    “I suspect there are a growing number of folks who agree with me that the Republicans deserve to lose, but the Democrats don't deserve to win. For us, it would be a great year for a ‘none of the above option.’"

    Both Goldberg and Bainbridge are c/o http://instapundit.com/

    ReplyDelete
  152. The NRO Guy with the funny name started it.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Mr. Mahathir almost quotes Barry Goldwater. But Golwater's quote about moderation/extremism got him cooked.

    ReplyDelete
  154. Too bad it didn't get him elected.

    ReplyDelete
  155. Hell, Maybe Hillary would have had an affair and remain unrewired.

    ReplyDelete
  156. The Barnyard girls just would have had to have done w/o.

    ReplyDelete
  157. My Uncle Bill, a Marine (ret), when the returns came in on Goldwater, unloaded both barrels of his 10 ga. goose gun into his tv set. Dunno what size shot he had in it, tho. prob #4 or #6.

    ReplyDelete
  158. Yoni has some news for Trish the benighted.

    IDF generals slam Halutz
    http://www.yonitheblogger.com/

    Without doubt, though, Yoni just obsessively pulled this “out of his ass.”

    “Maj.-Gen. Avigdor Ben-Gal (res.), former northern command chief, called on Halutz to resign…”

    “Some 70 former generals attended the meeting which lasted longer than planned.”

    “Some criticized commanders for prefering to follow the war on television instead of joining troops in the battlefield.”

    Now, this is the behavior of real patriots, who care for their troops.

    ReplyDelete
  159. No it must've been his 12. that old 10 was a single barrel, single shot. Uncle Bill was shooting landings in his little Piper Cub up in North Louisiana when he sheared the top of a pine tree and went off to the great beyond. Still young. Fiery, tho.

    ReplyDelete
  160. habu,
    the camp in Ash Fork is 5280, almost exactly. Tonto Basin us about 3600, but our place is on the creek, down in the bottom.

    ReplyDelete
  161. re: Trish the benighted

    Were the generals attacking General Halutz seeing generals behind every tree? Were they obsessing? What has the world come to when generals and not clowns attack generals?

    Gosh, another brillant refutation of another hormonally induced, stupid feeling. A feeling is not a thought, and an opinion is not a fact. And at the upper levels, men are demonstrably far more intelligent than females. Ha!!!

    ReplyDelete
  162. Sorry,
    I thot habu was freezin down at the bottom:
    That WOULD be miserable!

    ReplyDelete
  163. Allen 10:43:47 PM,
    But Girls are better lookin:
    Just ask Ms T.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Naw, he was way too young. Korea, though, after the shooting stopped. My grandad started up a little phone company after WWI, it's now CP-Tel, and several of the hands, when I got old enough to notice, were Korea vets. One of 'em was a machine-gunner in the line against the PLA human waves up in the north. His hands shook all the time, even as late as the 70s when I saw him last, unless he was "oiled up" as they say.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Chevron would fly a Piper down our little Canyon checkin the oil lines.
    The Waker-Upper was our great old Neighbor's boy tho, comin over in his AF Jet.
    The boys from Lemore NAS did the same:
    You ain't heard loud til you've heard a Tomcat inside a narrow Canyon!

    ReplyDelete
  166. AK Grows Caribou under the Oil Lines.
    I grew Tomatoes on top of em!

    ReplyDelete
  167. Allen, aka Senator Simpson, is starting to feel his age.
    Sometimes sees himself as Bart Simpson.

    ReplyDelete
  168. Good girl, Trish--don't let 'em needle ya--

    ReplyDelete
  169. Alan Simpson:

    "About 15 percent of the people in America are screwballs, lightweights and boobs," [Simpson] said, "and you don't want people like that not represented in the Congress."

    And this:
    "In politics," he lectured, "there are no right answers, only a continuing flow of compromises among groups, resulting in a changing, cloudy and ambiguous series of public decisions where appetite and ambition compete openly with knowledge and wisdom."

    ReplyDelete
  170. Oh my gosh! Conservative newspaper men are starting to obsess about generals and the potential danger they may pose to national security. On the authority of proctologist, Trish, Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough must be pulling this stuff "out of their asses."

    Don’t tell Trish about this article; spare these gentlemen a harping e-mail or a blog bitch slap.

    SCANDALOUS IF TRUE
    HTTP://WWW.POWERLINEBLOG.COM/

    ”[L]iberal ex-JAG John Hutson has admitted to Lindsey Graham (who did not disagree), the conferring rights on terrorists comes at a cost to our ability to obtain needed information.”

    “[JAGs] probably just assume, as one of their members has pronounced, that we cannot lose the war on terrorism as long as we provide lots of process to detainees.”

    “But if Gertz and Scarborough are correct, the JAG leadership is driven not just by substantive parochialism, but also by an ignoble desire to grow their bureaucracy and receive promotion.”

    “The war on terrorism has been exploited by the military judge advocates general (JAGs) to increase their numbers. The proliferation of military lawyers is at an all-time high, with Army JAG strength 10 percent larger than it was at the end of the Cold War.”

    “The three senior JAGs for the Army, Navy and Air Force, known as TJAGs, want three-star rank… But they need a larger corps of military lawyers to justify the boost in rank, we are told.”

    "National security was subordinated to TJAGs self-interest. Gaining an increase in JAG strength and three-star rank is more important than defeating the transnational terrorist threat."

    ReplyDelete
  171. Should start a whole agency:
    "CYA"

    ReplyDelete
  172. allen said:

    A feeling is not a thought, and an opinion is not a fact. And at the upper levels, men are demonstrably far more intelligent than females. Ha!!!

    Be that as it may, the limited payloads of space vehicles and the fact that men can be replaced by freezers and turkey basters means that the Final Frontier belongs exclusively to that half of the human race which produces offspring (and which also looks better, as doug will agree).

    ReplyDelete