COLLECTIVE MADNESS


“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."

Sunday, May 06, 2007

European Politics - Right Now?


The Labour Party had a good run with Tony Blair just passing the ten year mark as Prime Minister. It appears though, that the Labour run is over. The Guardian reports that across Great Britain, Labour's center or moderate supporters have abandoned the party in local elections. The anti-Blair Tories have benefited from the shift but what do the Tories represent these days? A kinder, gentler big tent? If so, we should get a preview of the Republican party. We may be entering a period of pragmatism in western politics; amorphous, nondescript pragmatism with little distinction from one party to the next. But that prediction doesn't apply to the French elections which offer a clear choice between an attractive but somewhat vacuous, status quo socialist versus a fiery and controversial populist reformer.

How do you make sense out of the news that Sarkozy has led Segolene Royale in every single poll and now appears to winning going away? The leftist Guardian UK reports takes a pessimistic view:
Royal has trailed Sarkozy in a hundred consecutive polls and is unlikely to make up the six to nine points that separate the two candidates. With 44 million Frenchmen and women heading for the polls, it looks very much as if Sarkozy's mix of promised radical change, economic liberalism and outright hard right populism has brought him victory - and possibly by a significant margin.

There is still a chance of an upset. Polls in France have been badly wrong before and 14 per cent of the voters, enough to swing the election, were apparently still undecided last night. But Sarkozy, 52, one of the most controversial and divisive figures of recent French political history, remains likely to replace outgoing President Jacques Chirac at the Elysee Palace. His slogan throughout months of campaigning has been 'Together, everything becomes possible'.

'That... is the least you can say,' muttered Loïc Delaurens, 29, a newspaper seller near the Place de la Republique in Paris, who voted Communist in the first round of voting two weeks ago. Sarkozy's team has already started working on the formation of a government and planning legislation, sources close to the former Interior Minister admitted. 'We'll get the parliamentary elections out of the way [in six weeks] and then really get moving,' said one member yesterday.

The campaign has been extraordinarily bitter, reflecting a polarised and divided people who know they are making a historic choice between very different individuals and very different programmes. 'If Sarkozy has the will and the ability to turn his announced policies into reality, he will turn France upside down,' said Ivan Rioufol, a leader writer at the right-wing Le Figaro newspaper. Royal, 53, also provokes fierce emotions, attacked by the right as an incompetent spendthrift representative of an unreformed left responsible for decades of cultural, social and economic decline. But the career politician, daughter of an army officer and educated at elite universities, remains far less controversial than her rival, the son of an immigrant seen as an outsider even by the establishment right.

For those who are voting against him, Sarkozy, whose electoral strategy has been to hunt votes amid the third of French voters who profess a 'sympathy' with the ideas of the extreme right, is 'the abomination of abominations'. 'This is a man who shook the hand of George Bush, who will destroy the French social model, who will institute a police state,' said Geraldine Chene, a Lyon-based Socialist activist. 'We hate him and all he stands for.'

Sarkozy's uncompromising statements on immigration are behind much of the fierce emotion he excites. Lilian Thuram, the French football star, has vociferously attacked Sarkozy's 'racist' rhetoric. He told The Observer yesterday he hoped that 'if Sarkozy is President he has the wisdom to find the words to unite the French'. Key public figures, such as the former tennis player and singer Yannick Noah, have pledged to leave the country in the event of his victory.

'You would think we were on the brink of civil war,' said Jacques Marseille, an author and historian.

For Mohammed Chirani, 29, who is walking across France to call for unity among his fellow citizens, 'the election has crystallised all the faultlines that divide the nation. I've never seen so much fear and hate. I'm not optimistic for the country, whoever wins.'

And though Royal's claims last week that a Sarkozy victory would lead to 'violence' were dismissed as scaremongering by her opponent's media team, significant social strife is likely if he wins. Many local mayors in areas where tensions are already high - Sarkozy is hated in many of the poorest housing estates in France for having described delinquents as 'scum' - are planning heavy police deployments tonight.

There is talk too of a 'third round' of the election in the streets. France's powerful unions last week vowed a trial of strength with Sarkozy who, through his plans to modify France's legally enforced 35-hour week, labour laws and expensive welfare model, is seen as the living incarnation of 'the excesses of American-style capitalism'.

'If Nicolas Sarkozy thinks that if elected he will have the right to push through all the reforms that he has announced, whatever the unions think of them, then he is making a big mistake,' said Bernard Thibault, the general secretary of the CGT, France's biggest union.'

Things are bad and getting worse in France. It wouldn't surprise me that a majority would vote for economic change. If Sarkozy is successful, what kind of country will he lead? Will the French socialists, communists and labor unions go ballistic?

60 comments:

  1. One can only hope the Muzzies make their big move with him in office, and he gets the backing of a majority of the Frogs to deal with them properly.
    (Something short of how Hitler treated the Jews, but just.
    ---
    Meanwhile without ladies like Malkin and Ingraham, PromoSemiHomoAd"men" would have made a misogynistic, polygamist, rapist child molester MUZZIE the centerpiece of our kids digital mobile lives.

    France vote for someone real, while in the USA, a few women try to defend our Heritage under the rule of Metrosexual Eunichwimps.
    Led of course, by the WimpchimpinChief.
    Rufus don't notice!
    ROP and La Raza, Baby!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "If Sarkozy is successful, what kind of country will he lead? Will the French socialists, communists and labor unions go ballistic?"

    I forgot to include the Musselmen!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Musn't forget our betters.
    PBUT!
    A million flaming Peugeots can't be wrong, can they?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just think, the toll under six years of Bush, approximately 40,000, at the hands of La Raza and their Narcoterrorist front groups, is in the ballpark of a decade of combat in Vietnam, yet what is the recognition of this fact in the popular culture?

    Maybe women, children, cops, and civilians are lesser people than those who died in Vietnam?

    The case can be made, and is, by omission.

    But Hell has yet to be paid for our inclusiveness toward the hatespewing "moderate" mosques in this country and their associated sleeper cells.
    PBUT!
    New Tone!
    Compassionate, "Conservative," "Christian," indeed!
    Karen Hughes '08!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I propose a Wall, in DC, to honor the 50,000 innocent civilians who died, under 8 years of GWB, at the hands of illegals and Drug Running Narcoterrorists.
    ---
    To do less would be an affront to reality.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A moment of ASCII silence for the Virtual 'Rat!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Come on, doug, Ms Hughes has had her time, it's passed.

    Unfortunately her shadow will be cast over the next election, while few of the voting public even know her name.

    A common lament, from many, is the percieved lack of respect or sympathy for US positions in the world. Blame for this is laid upon Mr Bush, where the buck does stop, but neither of his Sec of State have presented the US position well. Mr Powell never took a trip, Ms Rice is one.

    Who is it that decided that Hamas and Fatah are ready to reconcile with the Israeli? Ms Olmert?

    Why is US foreign policy in the hands of Mr Olmert and Mr Maliki? How did they gain the inititive in deciding the US's future course?

    What will the elevation of Ms Livini, in Israel, bring to US foreign policy?

    Or to France's, with regards the Middle East. Ms Royal, Ms Livini and Ms Rice. What a team to meet the Mussulmen, nah, there's no meat there.

    Mr Sarkozy, hope he is not another variation of Mr Bush. A socialist that wraps himself in the patriotic banner of conservatives, when he is not. Mr Bush, a product of conservative marketing and rhetoric, but the behaviours and actions of a liberal. As rufus so kindly listed for US, just yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No child left behind, except virtually all black kids in the ghetto, taught by LOSERS dealt to them by the UNIONIST NEA.
    Double, Triple, the money for the FEDERAL DOE!
    "For the Children"
    "The Keikei, in Hawaii, and possibly Alaska"

    ReplyDelete
  10. Olmert continues to govern with a 3% approval rating.
    Metros and Dhimmis firmly in control.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Right on, doug.
    Now my mom and dad qualify for Federal Welfare subsidies. They really need that hekp. So much so that my teenage daughter is borrowing money so her grandparents can spend it.

    School reform is vouchers, nothing less. Govenemt mandated education, through socialist school systems, not a capitalistic system. Why?

    It's been proven, time and again, that the work product of government workers lags that of competitive ones.

    ReplyDelete
  12. On Hedgecock,
    A black talkshow host described all the jobs, from janitor to framer, once available to our CITIZENS in South Central, now driven out by illegals, since their masters can hire 3 semi-skilled illegals for the price of ONE CITIZEN, and then discard them to the social welfare system when they can be economically replaced by younger ILLEGALS.
    VDH is right about what he knows, Trish, the CA he grew up in.
    Global Warfare, not so much!

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Black Radioguy attended the same group as Hedgecock, conviently blacked out by MSM.

    His wife was blown away by blacks working at Dulles, Cab drivers, Food Service, etc.

    Replaced 2 decades ago in Los Angeles, by illegals.
    The beat goes on,
    LA leads the way.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Let's not miss a chance to blame Bush. What are going to do when Bush is gone?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I propose a Wall in DC to honor those killed by the mosquito, the gretaest killer of mankind ever in history.

    It crosses party lines,affects all races,creeds, and colors and has ruined more camping trips than all other forms of life combined.

    I mean this is rdiculous. Just how long are we going to let our wives,mothers and father, sisters and brothers, children and pets, suffer under the piercing needle of this insect? In the name of humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  16. ... have to disagree on the Vouchers, Rat.

    Vouchers are still government money, not private. The EVENTUAL result of a voucher system would be gross government involvement in the schools using the vouchers.

    Purely private is the only way to go. When most Americans take their children out of public school and place them in private school; is when change will occur, but not until then. That happening, understandably, is remote.

    This is why government should not be in education at all. Public education is a complete loser and should be done away with (not likely). Public education is why liberal socialists have “control” over the masses.

    … the infamous RE-EDUCATION.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lugh:
    We are the ones who never miss an opportunity to blame GWB.

    Peri:
    Would you be more explicit?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Speaking to the subject, Whit. We can only hope the French election does really mean a lurch to the "right". It would be ironic if Europe's saving grace would end up being France!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Blacks don't know shit when they ask for vouchers to allow their kids to attend schools of equal quality as Bill Clinton, Algore, and GWB, 'Rat:

    We all know those private schools funded by voucher-babies may become federal indoctrination centers infested by malaria, borne by mosquitos, bred by whoever becomes POTUS after Saint George the Finest.

    Better they should go to trasheap schools now, taught by white commie union losers, and gunned down by drug dealers, than to take that chance of a future devolved in the immagination of psyco fantabulists.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Back in the old days, being pragmatists, Americans chose what worked, in the manner of the show me state, Missourri.
    Now, with much more time on our hands, we immagine a present or future that could be, and make our plans accordingly, on the basis of those fevered daydreams.
    As Ronnie said:
    "Progress is our most Important Product."

    ReplyDelete
  21. Aquarium wins the dumb shit comment prize for the day, Habu.

    Shame on all you GWB worshippers that enable him to ignore our laws as he trashes this country.

    Not funny to the 40k murdered by his much-beloved illegals.

    But then that's just Doug's opinion, not that of 10 separately chosen "personalities."

    ReplyDelete
  22. Well Whit, I suppose ya'll could continue to blame Bush (as though he were a god, capable of ruling by edit). Or ya'll could blame the new president.

    The Romans liked to blame the proconsul and senate and later the emperor.

    My preference for blame is the mob that is the American people. Why would you expect our leadership to have policies any different than the mob that empowers them?

    The new American anthem seems to be "I want it all" by Queen.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Doug,

    Do ya think the American people would embrace the sight of American soldiers shooting illegals crossing the border?

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think Americans would appreciate a President that enforced the law.
    Some here like the Rule of Saint George of Yale.
    Takes all kinds.
    Defend the Saint's refusal, nay, hostility to the law if you wish.
    See what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lugh!

    You've hit the nail on the head! In our system IT IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO CAN BE THE IMPEUTS FOR CHANGE!

    Alas! Most of us have forgotten that.

    ... we're not the mob, though ...

    The French proved they were the mob during their REVOLUTION!

    ReplyDelete
  26. The American people
    talk the talk
    but
    won't walk the walk

    and Bush KNOWS it

    ReplyDelete
  27. oops! "IMPETUS" - awwww, you get it!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Desiring a President that enforces, rather than shows contempt for the law, is now defined as BDS.
    Brave New World, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Right again, Lugh!

    Some of us are doing our best to convince others of this.

    However, if you're implying armed insurrection (theoretically) - it's too soon for that.

    ReplyDelete
  30. It's OUR fault that Bush has refused to enforce the laws he took an oath to enforce.
    Reality defined as needed.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Tiger,

    Aye tis true
    the American people can change government
    but the mob only grumbles

    only a few hundred thousand signers of petitions to redress grievances
    out of a nation of millions

    what if millions sent letters and petitions? would we have the sorry candidates that we see leading the pack today?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Lugh,
    THIS American educated his own child for 18 years, rather than send him to the schools that you and the Washington elite defend.
    ...as they send THEIR kids to private schools.
    ...just like a lot of the NEA teachers do.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Doug, I agree with you also. President Bush has NOT ENFORCED the LAW OF THE LAND!

    I think you and Lugh are actually speaking the same language!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yeah, petitions that'll do it.
    Perish the thought we DO something, like educate our kids, or NOT Buy Hollywood's trash.

    ReplyDelete
  35. English straight up and upside down, Tiger!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Millions might do it!

    "Until the Prols become conscious, they cannot rebel, until they rebel they cannot become conscious"

    ... Mr. Orwell said something like that ...

    ReplyDelete
  37. Doug!

    Passion is a wonderful thing!

    It helps to awaken many!

    Keep on truckin ....

    ReplyDelete
  38. My younguns went to public school and public universities...and are fine young conservatives who vote and stand up for their beliefs. So it ain't just the education system. It's parents teaching right and wrong.

    And...

    What would happen if 300 million Americans sent letters to the government demanding a position on an issue?

    Think THAT would have an impact?

    ReplyDelete
  39. I would sure hope so, Lugh.

    What else would you suggest?

    ... OH! If you have time, go and read Observanda for the last two years. There's many, many articles on public ed.

    The Tigress, BTW, is a public H.S. Teacher - has been for 30 years. She can't respond on this blog - she'll be fired if she does. She'll tell ya - public schools have done nothing but gone down, down, down ...

    ReplyDelete
  40. OK, Ghetto schools with reject white liberal castaways and no discipline or safety are just great.
    As long as your kids don't go there.

    As long as they are not shot there.

    Petition for Man on Mars.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Tiger,
    Think of the co-workers your wife would have had when we went to school, versus the doctrinaire self-centered liberal trolls run our schools today!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yes, I agree, Doug. The publics are very, very different now.

    The Tigress was raised in private Catholic girls schools. Her "co-workers" hate her guts. She's not a UNION member and she actually TEACHES!

    She wants to last 5 more years, Bless her!

    ReplyDelete
  43. My experience back then, and since, was that kids that went to Catholic Schools got a more thorough education.
    Bill Bennet and Rudy Giuliani two good examples.
    ...then there's Robers, Alito, ...!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Every child should learn Latin! That shows how "ol school" I am.

    Too bad I didn't learn it -I was public school kid - the Tigress did, though.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Gallia est Onnes Divisa in Partes Tres!

    ReplyDelete
  46. ... hmmmm, must be from the Gallic Wars


    : )

    ReplyDelete
  47. Nah, something to do with what will become of "Iraq!"

    ReplyDelete
  48. Sorry, Doug - gotta run!

    Keep on Truckin!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Tiger wrote:

    "Vouchers are still government money, not private. The EVENTUAL result of a voucher system would be gross government involvement in the schools using the vouchers."

    This is the sticky wicket of vouchers. Among those who favor vouchers, the argument is that, whatever evils vouchers will entail, they are less than those of the present system and therefor an admirable stop-gap. The threat you mention would, however, remain, absent further incremental reform.

    Wide school choice is sometimes advocated as an alternative or attendant to vouchers here in the US. In Belgium, where both our children attended local schools, there is almost complete freedom to choose a school - if you live in Mons, for instance, and want to drive your child to a particular school in Brussels or Nivelles, you may. Since universal school choice became the rule, however, almost all private schools (including parochial) went public. They do retain religious instruction though. (And nowhere is French-as-a-Second-Language offered. Fancy that.)

    "Purely private is the only way to go. When most Americans take their children out of public school and place them in private school; is when change will occur, but not until then. That happening, understandably, is remote."

    Most Americans are not able or prepared to make the double sacrifice that private education entails. We did it for a number of years and it wasn't easy.

    Some of the best incubators of private education systems are in the former Bloc countries, where after the dissolution of the Soviet Union people spontaneously sought and established (very low budget) private schools free from the oversight, ideology, and stultification of the old system. Supply slowly rose to meet fresh demand.

    "This is why government should not be in education at all. Public education is a complete loser and should be done away with (not likely). Public education is why liberal socialists have “control” over the masses."

    As one father said: If I wouldn't want the government supplying my children's shoes, why on earth would I want it supplying their education?

    After very early experience with the public education of our oldest child, we came to the conclusion that often what passes for an elementary school, is in fact a nursing home for the able and a detention center for the innocent.

    ReplyDelete
  50. What kind of leverage do voters have in between the election cycles?

    It's a disturbing question, "What can we do?"

    I know some people are trying to buy private land or buy fencing for private land and create a neighborhood watch-inspired national border. It's something, but given the sophistication of the problem, it can't be an answer - although its a powerful gesture.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I must add: Every secondary school in Belgium and Germany that offers the A-level curriculum (the standard college prep) has mandatory Latin, in addition to a foreign language. Or, in Belgium, in addition to two foreign languages, as the French-speaking must learn Dutch and visa versa.

    ReplyDelete
  52. ppab
    private walled and secured communities, neighborhoods, are all the rage.

    Or go the rural route, if your inet business can carry on in the face of the natural solitude of country living

    ReplyDelete
  53. It used to be understood that there were situations where you threw out the rulebook.
    When FDR wanted to start a covert operations service, he ignored the established bureaucracy and turned instead to "Wild Bill" Donovan, a Manhattan businessman (and Republican to boot). The result was the Office of Strategic Services , a ripe gaggle of New York socialites, lawyers, communists, homosexuals, and adventurers who got the job done while breaking every rule in existence.

    As soon as the war was over, the OSS was rolled up - there was never any hope it would fit in with a peacetime bureaucracy.

    It appears that we've lost that capacity.

    As a society, we seem content to believe that bureaucracy is the only possible method of doing things, at least as far as governments go. And that could be fatal.

    American Thinker, via
    3 Case

    ReplyDelete