COLLECTIVE MADNESS


“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."

Sunday, April 08, 2007

Hail the conquering heroes. A tale of two headlines.

We live in an age where words no longer have meaning. Shame is gone. Moral relativity and Jerry Springer have won. The two stories from this morning's Telegraph tells the dismal tale about what is next for the fab fifteen, and a hint about the consequences of their moment in history. I add the photos of real heroes from a less enlightened era.

Real Heroes
Tobruk, Libya. 25 April 1953. Group portrait of five Victoria Cross winners, members of the Australian and New Zealand Coronation Contingent, in the Tobruk War Cemetery, during their brief stay while on their way to England to attend the coronation of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II. They are, left to right: Private (Pte) F. J. Partridge VC, (Australia); Pte E. Kenna VC, (Australia); 215003 Sergeant J. D. Hinton VC, (New Zealand); Pte R. Kelliher VC, (Australia); Sergeant R. R. Rattey VC.


The Fab Fifteen, post ordeal
(I feel sorry for the three on the right)


MoD: Captured crew can sell their stories

By Emma Henry and agencies
Last Updated: 10:17am BST 08/04/2007

The 15 British service personnel held captive in Iran have been given official permission to cash in on their 13-day ordeal by selling their stories to the media.

The Ministry of Defence said it had taken the unusual decision because of the "exceptional circumstances" surrounding their situation.

It means that the eight Royal Navy sailors and seven Royal Marines can now look forward to five or six-figure payouts.

However the move could also expose them to criticism from others in the Armed Forces who have suffered as a result of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan but have not been allowed to profit in the same way

The MoD said they attracted similar intense media interest as someone who had won the Victoria Cross - the military's highest award for gallantry in the face of enemy fire.

"Serving personnel are not allowed to enter into financial arrangements with media organisations. However, in exceptional circumstances such as the award of a Victoria Cross or events such as those in recent days, permission can be granted by commanding officers and the MoD," the statement said.

____________________


Buoyant Teheran warns of further kidnappings

By Gethin Chamberlain, Philip Sherwell and Tim Shipman, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 11:56pm BST 07/04/2007

Hardliners in the Iranian regime have warned that the seizure of British naval personnel demonstrates that they can make trouble for the West whenever they want to and do so with impunity.


President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: a PR bounce


The bullish reaction from Teheran will reinforce the fears of western diplomats and military officials that more kidnap attempts may be planned.

The British handling of the crisis has been regarded with some concern in Washington, and a Pentagon defence official told The Sunday Telegraph: "The fear now is that this could be the first of many. If the Brits don't change their rules of engagement, the Iranians could take more hostages almost at will.



142 comments:

  1. Would I be as harsh if these were Americans? Brutal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do feel sorry for the three lads on the right side of the picture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Woman sailor sells her story in lucrative deal

    By Chris Hastings, Sunday Telegraph
    Last Updated: 11:56pm BST 07/04/2007

    Faye Turney, the woman sailor at the centre of the Iran hostage crisis, is to reveal the trauma of her 13-day ordeal in a solo interview.


    Faye Turney: The deal involves a 'life-changing sum'

    Leading Seaman Turney, who was paraded on Iranian television during her captivity, is understood to have agreed a lucrative deal with ITV's Tonight with Trevor McDonald for a special programme to be broadcast tomorrow evening.

    It is thought the deal will also involve an interview with a tabloid newspaper. A source at the MoD said it involved a "life-changing sum".

    But the involvement of a large amount of money and her decision to be interviewed on her own could backfire.

    Ldg Seaman Turney, 26, was warned last night that the interview and payment could attract controversy, given the deaths of four British soldiers, including two women, in Basra on the day that she was released.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 2164th: I do feel sorry for the three lads on the right side of the picture.

    That's very odd, I wonder how the ones with a shred of dignity managed to clump together apart from the dirty dozen? If it was up to me I'd track them down and give them a plane ticket to the home of the brave.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Purple Fingers Choice:

    The Nov. 19 killings have placed Haditha in the spotlight, prompted comparisons to Vietnam and damaged U.S.-Iraqi relations.

    Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has called the deaths "a horrible crime," and accused U.S. troops of habitually attacking unarmed civilians.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When I first read this, I thought maybe it was clever satire. Even after seeing the story with my own eyes on the British web site, it still seems unreal, like something out of a Monte Python skit.

    It is common for US military generals, etc. to write books after they retire, which is usually years after things happened, but it is amazing for active service personnel to be giving details of an event like this days after it happened. Isn't any of this information classified, like the operational details? The debriefings were so short that the British commanders will probably learn new details from the tabloid interview.

    All along this had the feeling that the hostages just wanted to get it over with so they could be on the British equivalent of Oprah, but I couldn't believe it. When the sailors first got back home the government said something like "The briefing will be short, and it will be to meet their needs [not ours]". Then the hostages said they wanted to be "given space".

    I actually started reading through the "History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" a week ago, to see if they had the same signs that our Anglo-Saxon countries do (US, UK, Aust.).

    ReplyDelete
  7. TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman said Sunday that his country has been searching for a former FBI agent missing in Iran for almost a month.

    Levinson's relatives said last week they are worried and doing everything possible to find him.

    U.S. officials, meanwhile, have downplayed the disappearance as routine.
    ---
    He disappeared.
    Routinely.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wu,
    The Generals will be able to mimic Bubba:
    "I honestly didn't know about it until I read it in the Mirror."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wu Wei said...
    When I first read this, I thought maybe it was clever satire. Even after seeing the story with my own eyes on the British web site, it still seems unreal, like something out of a Monte Python skit.

    Brilliant observation wu. Wish I would have thought of it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. On a previous thread I posted a picture of some little shiite with a smirk on his face holding a helmet. This morning in the Express is an article about the young woman. who's head was in the helmet. Look at the picture.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Fury as hostages sell story

    Take a look at these story, from what appears to be a conservative UK newspaper. It gets even wilder. (Honestly, I am NOT making this up.)

    Quotes from newspapers:

    One of the hostages, Dean Harris, 30, an acting sergeant in the Royal Marines, told a Sunday Times reporter yesterday: “I want £70,000. That is based on what the others have told me they have been offered. I know Faye has been offered a heck more than that. I am worth it because I was one of only two who didn’t crack.

    He claimed the marines were planning to sell on eBay the vases given to them in their “goody bags” by the Iranians.

    The freedom they were given surprised Max Clifford, the storybroker, who said the MoD was “frogmarching them out to win the propaganda war”.

    Colonel Bob Stewart, a commander of British UN forces in Bosnia, said: “I am appalled the MoD is encouraging them to profit from a military disaster. Some of them are acting like reality TV stars.

    ----
    This weekend relatives of victims killed or injured in the Iraq war and opposition politicians criticised the authorisation as “inappropriate” and “undignified”. It comes only three days after their release and before they have given detailed evidence to an official inquiry.

    Liam Fox, the shadow defence secretary, said: “One of the great things about our armed forces is their professionalism and dignity. Many people who shared the anxiety of the hostages’ abduction will feel that selling their stories is somewhat undignified and falls below the very high standards we have come to expect from our servicemen and women.”

    Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon Gentle was killed by a roadside bomb in Basra in Iraq, said the MoD should not allow the servicemen to sell their stories. “This is wrong and I don’t think it should be allowed by the MoD. None of the parents who have lost loved ones in Iraq have sold their stories,” she said.

    ReplyDelete
  12. For whether we are Christian or Moslem, we profess to hold a faith that comes from Abraham – the Father of all Nations. We adore the one, merciful God, who will be mankind’s judge on the last day. All nations form one community. We come from the one God who created us, and we will return to the one God as our common destiny. One day we will all be gathered in the holy city of God, where there will be perfect peace and harmony, and everyone will be reconciled. In an important way, today represents building some of that city today in our midst.

    "... and everyone will be reconciled."

    ReplyDelete
  13. Right out of the White House.

    From Mr Bush's lips to many ears.

    "Give them some space, to reconcile"

    ReplyDelete
  14. This post by fellowpeacekeeper is worth of a note and comment. He knows what he is talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  15. RAMALLAH, West Bank — Israel is reviewing a list of hundreds of Palestinians prisoners that Gaza militants want released in exchange for a captured Israeli soldier, an official and media reports said Sunday, in a sign of potential progress in the 10-month standoff over a deal.

    The release of Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit is a precondition for any possible progress in Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts. A swap could also help the new Palestinian unity government, a coalition of the Islamic militant Hamas and the moderate Fatah movements, in its quest for international acceptance.

    There were conflicting reports on the captors' demands. Some said the list contained close to 500 names, while others said there were twice as many. A Palestinian close to the negotiations was told that among those on the list is Palestinian uprising leader Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five consecutive life terms for his role in shooting attacks that killed four Israelis and a Greek monk.


    How weak will Israel be percieved, vis a vie England, if hundreds of Palis are released, in a detainee swap

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Iraqi Army is doing excellent, there in

    Lamla also confirmed that insurgents attack the multinational base in Diwaniyah on a daily basis but said his forces cannot return fire because the attacks come from residential areas. "We do not want to hurt residents," he said.

    Doh! This problem is old, they seem to have lost control of central Diwaniyah last year. I would like to hear General Llama explain why is a military base is maintained a easy mortar/rocket attack from a insurgent save haven? Or if the base is immovable, why is the no-go area permitted? And what exactly does MND(CS) actually do in Diwaniyah anyway, since they have handed over responsiblity for the district to local forces last year?

    Underscoring the threat, police said gunmen attacked an American patrol in Diwaniyah and two civilians were wounded in clashes.

    Police, which police? The militia supporting ones? Who were the gunmen, maybe they were police?

    In spite of his criticism to Iraqi police, Lamla praised the Iraqi army's 8th Division which is in charge of Kut and Diwaniyah.


    "This division is the best formation in the Iraqi army, it is well-equipped and has the best commander and officers and are doing excellent job in a very wide and sprawling area ," he said.
    "Excellent job" ... excellent?


    or so reports the peacekeeper

    Check out the motto on the wall
    First to Go - Last to Know

    ReplyDelete
  17. Meanwhile Grandma P, and her touring group of Spring Breakers, stopped in Portugal where the tour guide said this:

    Pelosi said Friday she had paid no attention to the dustup back in the United States.

    She also said the delegation was not trying to cut deals between Syria and Israel but rather "assessing the ground truth" to inform spending decisions made by Congress.

    "What others were saying and doing was many miles away, in a different time zone and had no impact on our trip except to call more attention to it," Pelosi said.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Pelosi and W deserve each other:
    "Leaders" from Hell.

    ReplyDelete
  19. > ...God, who will be mankind’s judge on the last day.

    The Priest is talking about the end of the world, not a peace treaty now.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Bitch that never misses a cuckholding,
    and the Wuss that takes it on the other cheek.

    ReplyDelete
  21. In an important way, today represents building some of that city today in our midst.

    Sounds like he's talkin' about TODAY, when he says "today represents..."
    Building towards reconciliation.
    TODAY

    ReplyDelete
  22. Huh?
    Tillman's brother came home, right?

    "Holly Dyer, who is also an Army officer, was at home on leave from Iraq when she was told of her sister’s death. She will have to attend 23-year-old Joanna’s funeral before returning to complete a further tour of duty in the country where her sister, a friend of Prince William, was murdered by Shia militants."

    Looks like my sis in law, also deceased, from the "free" love cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  23. He would still have been a Ranger for a while, four years from the enlistment date in May of '02, anyway. Jr went in Sep that year, but enlisted in May. Lots of patriotic war fever here in AZ, then.

    Everybody wanted to "go get some".

    Whether he was redeployeed or stayed at Ft Stewart, wouldn't know. I assume he got out.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Mrs Veck has suffered the ordeal of watching television pictures of grinning Iraqis clutching her daughter’s helmet moments after the bomb blast in which she and three comrades, with their Kuwaiti interpreter, were killed.

    “There are lots of innocent people in Iraq and it was my little girl’s job to go out there and help them, not the people we saw on television holding up her helmet,” said the 41-year-old hotel manager.

    “There are lots of people around the world who need our help. If it’s our job to help them then that’s what we should do. Nothing could have stopped her from serving her country. She was doing exactly what she wanted and she had always dreamed of joining the army.
    ---
    We deserve better leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Who would want to be reconciled with a Muzzie in Hell?

    ReplyDelete
  26. >Mrs Veck has suffered the ordeal of watching television pictures of grinning Iraqis clutching her daughter’s helmet

    I hope that doesn't lead us to cut and run like when they dragged the bodies through the streets in Somalia. The US needs to be stronger and not so easily manipulated by images. We know there are pro-terrorist people there who want to bomb up and then desecrate the bodies and anything which is left over. Those people may have been told lies about us.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Deuce's link reminds me of Steyn on Miller's Show:
    "They're over there watching, saying,
    These people WANT to submit.
    "

    COOL

    ReplyDelete
  28. I should add, I agree with what the mother said, which is very heroic. She clearly explains that some Iraqis want us there and some don't.

    The real reason for being in Iraq though is self-defense, whether some Iraqis like us or not. The goal always has to be the fewest deaths we can have while still keeping our freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Deuce:
    That Bishop is one sick Shithead!
    ...I thot my Presby Ministers were bad!

    ReplyDelete
  30. "The goal always has to be the fewest deaths we can have while still keeping our freedom."
    ---
    W receives an *F* on that score.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It is my fervent hope that the lessons we will all learn from this incident are that:

    prayers in faith are answered

    anxiety can provide a trigger for good

    violations of sea- and air-space happen all the time, even around Britain, and the intruders are sent on their way. But it is important to keep a cool head so that these sensitive occasions depend on a unity of purpose to bring about a realistic and speedy solution.

    charts and treaties need constant updating in order to avoid any confusion and misunderstanding

    we are all called to share the limited resources available in this world for the benefit of all

    there is a goodness within mankind that can triumph over every difficulty – as is eminently shown by this Holy Week in which we find ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The US and its' freedoms have been defended for over 200 years, without an US Army in Iraq.

    There is no threat in Iraq, certainly not just 500 aQ foreigners and a couple thousand aQIraq, that requires 150,000 US troops.

    Those troops are required to secure Mr Maliki's Government, not the US's. The two are not the same.
    I could and have argue that Mr Maliki and his team are opponents to US strategic interests in the Region.

    So there you go, your basic premise of defense yet to be proved. If "They" were coming here, the 50,000 terrorists trained in Afghanistan and the thousands of foreigners that have been reported cycled through live fire training, against US, in Iraq.

    Troops deployments in Ramadi will not stop a Pakistani or Suad hit team nor the next homegrown Mohammed and Malvo.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Keeping Iraq out of the picture for the sake of argument,
    and re:
    "W receives an *F* on that score."
    ---
    40 THOUSAND have died thanks to W's ongoing open-borders policy.

    Real People, really DEAD.

    ReplyDelete
  34. 43 K Dead, and Half a Trillion later,
    Here we are.
    (Mullahs laugh, hysterically)

    ReplyDelete
  35. I guess what I meant about the Priest's statement is that it is the same pacifism that they've been using my whole life. Whenever conflict breaks out somewhere in the world, the Pope issues a statement saying the fighting should stop, blah blah blah. I'm not Catholic so I don't know the ins and outs, but it seems to always be the same.

    Pacifism is the least harmful when it is out in the open, like when people expect a religious figure to be pacifist. The dangerous pacifism is that of the Left, which pretends that it only opposes THIS war, and has a non-pacifist reason for doing so.

    ReplyDelete
  36. We are about 7k short of Vietnam, which stretched over multiple admins, when INNOCENT CIVILIANS are included.
    Good job, W.

    ReplyDelete
  37. AND,
    I left out the 3k of 9-11:
    46 THOUSAND.

    ReplyDelete
  38. The dangerous pacifism is having a CIC that oversees 46k DEAD, and still spouts ROP Bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  39. The White House's draft plan, leaked last week, calls for a new "Z" visa that would allow illegal immigrant workers to apply for three-year work permits. They would be renewable indefinitely, but would cost $3,500 each time.

    Then to become legal permanent residents, illegal immigrants would have to return to their home country, apply at a U.S. embassy or consulate to re-enter legally and pay a $10,000 fine.

    The proposal has been sharply criticized by Hispanic advocacy groups, many Democrats, the Roman Catholic Church and unions that have many immigrants in their ranks. They argue the cost of work permits and the green card application are prohibitive for low-wage earners.

    "For my wife and I it would cost about $30,000," said Francisco Gomez, 41, who along with his wife is in the country illegally. "Multiply that by all the illegal immigrants here ... It's obvious Bush just wants to fund his Iraq war with our money."

    Maria Lopez, 50, an illegal immigrant who works as a seamstress and sends $200 a month home to family members in Mexico, said she could never apply for residency under Bush's plan.

    "We have no way to come up with that much money, and Bush knows that," she said. "He is doing this on purpose so we don't ever become legal residents."

    The march passed through one of most heavily Hispanic districts in downtown, collecting people who had come to do their weekend shopping. Stopping at City Hall, protesters danced to beating drums and listened to immigrant rights speakers.

    Alfredo Gonzalez, 33, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, marched with his wife and daughters, ages 6 and 8. He said he fears the stepped-up immigration raids happening across the country.

    "If they kick me out, who is going to take care of my daughters? The government? I don't think so," said Gonzalez, who works in construction. "We need full legalization and we need it now."

    The White House plan is far more conservative than the one passed by the Senate last year with bipartisan backing and support from President Bush. That plan would have allowed many of the country's illegal immigrants to stay in the United States, work and apply to become legal residents after learning English, paying small fines and back taxes and clearing a background check.

    Many Senate conservatives opposed that plan. It failed to gain traction in the then Republican-controlled House, which at the end of 2005 passed a punitive immigration reform bill that angered immigrant communities and led to massive protests.

    Many protesters said they were frustrated that immigration reform hadn't been passed, despite all the protests and activism in immigrant communities over the last year.

    Rocio Estrada, a 24-year-old illegal immigrant from Mexico, said she wanted to attend nursing school but couldn't afford it because she couldn't get financial aid without legal residency.

    "We just came here for a dream," she said, holding her 4-year-old son. "The more they deport people the more we are going to come back."

    ReplyDelete
  40. > So there you go, your basic premise of defense yet to be proved.

    I think it is absolutely proven, and I didn't need to prove it in the first place. Can you prove it wouldn't be dangerous to let Al Qaeda form a base camp in Iraq like the one in Afghanistan which they launched 9/11 from?

    What meaning is there to the global war on terror if we let Al Qaeda take over Iraq, or a portion of it? How could the US have any credibility if we say bin Laden and Al Qaeda are our mortal enemies, then we cut & run out of Iraq and let Al Qaeda have it? That's especially true when the Iraqis (Sunnis) have partnered with us and are begging us to stay and defeat Al Qaeda.

    ReplyDelete
  41. ""For my wife and I it would cost about $30,000," said Francisco Gomez, 41, who along with his wife is in the country illegally.

    "Multiply that by all the illegal immigrants here ... It's obvious Bush just wants to fund his Iraq war with our money."
    "
    ---
    Hey, Francisco:
    "He" already told you what he is, now all you gotta do is negotiate the price!

    ReplyDelete
  42. On principle, wu, I oppose War.

    Any sane person would.
    But there is war and then there is what the US practices in Iraq, which is policing.

    The two are not the same.
    FallujahII, that was a war
    Haditha, a year later, was policing.

    Same Marines, same equipment, same Iraqi culture. Different Rules.

    If you commit a Nation to war, go to war. Don't half-step down the ambush trail, break some brush.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Wu's back to defending the indefensible:
    You don't conduct war in a non-warlike manner.
    You don't secure borders by offering ever-better deals for border crossers.

    OUT.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Certainly that is provable.

    There have been and are often taken down CURRENT aQ bases in Iraq. US presence has not curtailed them, in fact has provided live fire training for aQ trainees from Algeria and Europe. Training that was unavailable in 2000.

    The US has permitted aQ camps to be established and enlarged in Pakistan, gave Taliban operatives control of sections of Afghanistan, under NATO/Brit decisions, allows aQ training in Sudan.

    US presence in Iraq did not deter Mohammedan attacks in Spain, England, US, France, Belgium or Holland.

    The aQ battleplan was to engage the US in a tar baby war, either in the Middle East or Southwest Asia, they got both. They have no shortage of combat leadership or recruits, per General McCaffery.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I never said a word about amnesty here. Maybe I was confused with someone else.

    I am not part of the Bush Administration, and have been a frequent critic of him. I am not responsible for him or the way he fights wars.

    ReplyDelete
  46. (temporarily) IN:
    Bill Clinton prevented any "attacks on America" from 1993 until he left office.
    (Sailors and such don't count.)

    ReplyDelete
  47. but sometimes you DO
    sound like an apologist,
    WU!

    ReplyDelete
  48. "The real reason for being in Iraq though is self-defense, whether some Iraqis like us or not. The goal always has to be the fewest deaths we can have while still keeping our freedom.
    "

    ReplyDelete
  49. Don't stand up to reality, under CIC "W"

    ReplyDelete
  50. General McCaffery makes an ineresting point.

    Upon US entry and for at least a decade prior Iraq could house 20 to 25,000 criminal prisoners.

    About 1% of the population.
    Genral McCaffery said prison capacity for 150,000 is required.
    6% of the population.

    The General also puts enemy combat KIA at 20,000+, with the enemy constantly improving despite the losses.

    Reconciliation between the anti aQ Sunni and the Shia Government still far away.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Yeah, but reconciliation is EVERYTHING, baby!

    ReplyDelete
  52. What's the US Prison figure?
    Those damned lefties claim it's the highest in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  53. (not too hard to believe, given two hots, cots, AC, TV, weightrooms, and etc)

    ReplyDelete
  54. Those Sunni now being recruited into the Police will behave with similar loyalty patterns to the Shia Police in Basra.

    Their loyalty will not be tranfered to the Government in Baghdad, when they put on that police uniform..

    ReplyDelete
  55. Hell, that's what they do in Hawaii, for property crimes, and sometimes much more!

    ReplyDelete
  56. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  57. "You got to give,
    to get.
    "
    ---
    True story of some dude that ripped off multiple cases of Bud from a local restaurant business, so he could GIVE them at his parties in his tire shop!
    ---
    My one experience in Jury Duty.
    I, and some 70 year old lady were the only ones with enough balls to secure a guilty verdict.
    (probly overturned on appeal)

    ReplyDelete
  58. 300 million : 2 million
    .666%

    Five years ago America's prison population topped 2 million inmates for the first time in history on June 30, 2002 according to a new report from the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS).
    The 50 states, the District of Columbia and the federal government held 1,355,748 prisoners (two-thirds of the total incarcerated population), and local municipal and county jails held 665,475 inmates.

    By midyear 2002, America's jails held 1 in every 142 U.S. residents. Males were incarcerated at the rate of 1,309 inmates per 100,000 U.S. men, while the female incarceration rate was 113 per 100,000 women residents.

    Of the 1,200,203 state prisoners, 3,055 were younger than 18 years old. In addition, adult jails held 7,248 inmates under 18.

    Federal, state and local prisons see increases
    During the 12-month period ending last June 30, the local jail population increased by 34,235 inmates, the largest increase (5.4 percent) since 1997.
    ...
    Non-citizen prison population also growing
    As of last June 30, state and federal correctional authorities held 88,776 non-citizens, a 1 percent increase from the 87,917 held a year earlier. Sixty-two percent were held in state prisons and 38 percent in federal institutions

    ReplyDelete
  59. "You got to give,
    to get."
    ---
    That's what the perp said on the stand!
    ...the majority bought it.

    ReplyDelete
  60. > You don't conduct war in a non-warlike manner.

    A counter insurgency war is not world war II. It's a lot tougher, and if our country too weak to fight a counter insurgency war, then we will lose the global war on terror and our freedom.

    I don't believe all the stuff about rules of engagement because our military is not the soft. When they are faced with crappy rules of engagement (like in every war), the troops change them or disobey them, whatever it takes to win. Our military has always been "can-do". Wars are won and lost in the field, not by the commander in chief.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Math mistake alert!

    Saddam could jail .1% of his people

    General McCaffery wants to up Iraqi capacity to US ratios of .666% or above.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Iran is patient. Hezbollah is patient. They don't have to fight every battle like World War II. If we can't do the same thing...

    ReplyDelete
  63. 5:39 p.m. April 6, 2007

    LOS ANGELES – A driver arrested after the crash that killed “A Christmas Story” director Bob Clark and his son pleaded not guilty Friday to two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.
    Prosecutors say Hector Velazquez-Nava, a 24-year-old Mexican national, was drunk when he steered his sport utility vehicle into the wrong lane of Pacific Coast Highway early Wednesday, and struck Clark's sedan. Clark, 67 and his son, Ariel Hanrath-Clark, 22, died at the scene.

    Velazquez-Nava had a blood-alcohol level of 0.24 percent, three times the legal limit, authorities said. Both he and his passenger were treated for minor injuries.
    “The family

    ReplyDelete
  64. I've done counter insurgency, trained foreigners in the task, we won.

    People were killed, bad guys & civilians, too.

    Lots of folk displaced, moved, refugeed. None made better by it.

    The "long term" result of the "success" is MS-13 spreading across the US.

    ReplyDelete
  65. "I don't believe all the stuff about rules of engagement because our military is not the (THAT) soft"
    ---
    LTc Kurrila if proof that you are WRONG.
    Hundreds of others have died proving it.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Since Mr Ortega, the then "enemy" has been elected, as a minority vote getting President.

    Peace in our Time.

    ReplyDelete
  67. The two Lance Cpl tried it your way, wu.
    Rolling frags into rooms, prior to entry. Same as they did in Fallujah, a year before.
    After being told, reportedly according to investigators
    "Shoot first, ask questions later" by their SSg

    The two E3s have been charged with murder.

    Hadithia Marines 60 minutes, goodle away, read a first hand account, by the SSg.

    ReplyDelete
  68. The biggest part of Velazquez-Nava's "punishment" will be deportation.
    ...same thing as hard-working campesinos get when we selectively enforce the law.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Prison and Humiliation ain't no big thing, 'Rat.
    ...when you're doing it for your Country and CIC.

    ReplyDelete
  70. 60 minutes?
    the opposite is true!

    ReplyDelete
  71. "Wu Wei said...
    Iran is patient.
    Hezbollah is patient. They don't have to fight every battle like World War II. If we can't do the same thing...
    "
    ---
    Nothing like slow failure.
    The hurt feels SO Good.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Statistics from '05 via WaPo and google

    A record 7 million people -- one in every 32 US adults -- were behind bars, on probation or on parole by the end of last year, a Justice Department report ...

    1 in 32, tad over 3%

    ReplyDelete
  73. Read it, the SSgt is on shaky ground, but the E3s...

    ReplyDelete
  74. SSgt - Where did he depart from SOP about entering building from which they were receiving fire?

    ReplyDelete
  75. The US has never shown patience, wu.

    To develop a strategic or tactical policy that requires it, fool hardy.

    You go to war with the Country you've got, adapt accordingly.

    Do not expect the US to change, without an exitensial threat.
    Islam, the Religion of Peace, is by the choice of words used, no threat at all.

    ReplyDelete
  76. They fragged the rooms, without seeing the threat, first.

    ReplyDelete
  77. THAT was for your post about "country you've got"

    ReplyDelete
  78. wasn't the threat incoming fire from said buildings?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Do not expect the US to change, without an existential threat.

    Islam, the Religion of Peace, is by the choice of words used, no threat at all.

    Yup

    ReplyDelete
  80. "For whether we are Christian or Moslem, we profess to hold a faith that comes from Abraham – the Father of all Nations. We adore the one, merciful God, who will be mankind’s judge on the last day."

    ReplyDelete
  81. So it was said.
    But they did not identify a specific window or location in the building.

    Each room becomes a new situation.
    By not identifying the individual target, the actual armed threat, the Marines killed nonthreatening Iraqi.

    Recall Yon's suprise that the bionic runner was not fired up, after he dropped the detonator? He was no longer a threat, not a legit target of lethal force.

    I doubt that the Marines were out there with concussion grenades, flash bangs, that police are equipped with. Did they even have a choice in weaponry?

    The E3s, I do feel for them. As one of the mothers said:
    "The Marines abandoned my son"

    I tend to agree.

    ReplyDelete
  82. re: Prisoners in Saddam's day.

    "About 1% of the population."

    Probly about what we had under Eisenhower, proving you don't have to have a Fascist Dictator to maintain law and order.

    ReplyDelete
  83. "The Marines abandoned my son"
    THAT is for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  84. "Recall Yon's suprise that the bionic runner was not fired up, after he dropped the detonator? He was no longer a threat, not a legit target of lethal force."
    ---
    Dan and I say Nuke em!
    Trish recoils and offers offspring as sacrifices!
    (JOKE, Trish!)

    ReplyDelete
  85. Back when Ike was POTUS,
    and PC and Multiculti
    had yet to be fantasized,
    Law and order did not mean a fascist state, it simply meant that laws were enforced right side up.

    (w/o ACLU Lawyers, Bobal)

    ...not perfect, many blacks and Hispanics not treated equally, but on the whole, it was not upside down, like today.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Previous thread. (if Habu can, I can!)
    Von Neuman loved to drink, party, and etc. and had a racing team of Ferraris and such.
    Could have been an EB member, but he was too smart!

    ReplyDelete
  87. "Von Neumann was married twice. He married Mariette Kövesi in 1930.

    When he proposed to her, he was incapable of expressing anything beyond

    "You and I might be able to have some fun together, seeing as how we both like to drink."
    True EB Pledge, except for those damned smarts.
    ...he was a polymath, also.

    ReplyDelete
  88. To paraphrase:

    When politics permeate every sector of life, we call it Totalitarianism. When religion permeates every sector of life,
    we call it Theocracy. When commerce
    dominates everything, some call it Liberty.




    On a side note,

    Price is perception. Perception does not always equal reality. And reality is always subject to change (but that's just a man-made law of thermodynamics).

    ReplyDelete
  89. Von_Neumann
    Atom Bomb, Computer, H-Bomb, and etc.
    Inspiration for Simoni, now in space, and developer of Word, Excel, and now, Intentional Software.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Doug,

    Here's a little something I'm prescribing to calm the nerves:

    Luxuria Music

    ReplyDelete
  91. You'll blow your engine with that stuff!

    ReplyDelete
  92. We just can't afford a new cork padding every time you blow a gasket!

    ReplyDelete
  93. I can't Permatex Gasket Sealant!

    ReplyDelete
  94. ...but I have a NEED for Speed.

    ReplyDelete
  95. CRAP!
    "I can't AFFORD Permatex Gasket Sealant!"

    ReplyDelete
  96. Hey, how come we're not on this list!?

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq-blogs.htm

    ReplyDelete
  97. The oddest thing about this for me has been the fact that these peope are Royal Marines. In other words, supposedly elite troops. The Royal Marine Corps is much smaller than the American version and, insofar as exclusivity is concerned, about equal to American Rangers.

    Is the woman a Royal Marine or merely Navy? Look at how obese she is (even setting aside the fact we don't allow female Rangers). Either they fed her extremely well or fitness standards are in the toilet.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Looking it up, it appears the woman was Royal Navy.

    That's a slight relief.

    ReplyDelete
  99. "I do feel sorry for the three lads on the right side of the picture."

    Complete agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  100. > To develop a strategic or tactical policy that requires it, fool hardy.

    So are Iran and Hezbollah fool hardy for not trying to fight their battles like world war II? If they are that stupid, then why bother fighting them? They're bound to lose. If World War II fighting is the only thing that matters, then we can ignore the Islamists until they have armies the size of Hitler. Terrorism doesn't matter, according to that argument.

    It's fun to pretend that all wars are one uniformed army shooting another, with a clean surrender at the end, but the world was never that way. There was always conventional fighting and guerrilla wars.

    Retreat into believing that we have a fantasy opponent who is easy to beat won't win the war. We have a tougher enemy than that.

    ReplyDelete
  101. "Mrs Veck has suffered the ordeal of watching television pictures of grinning Iraqis clutching her daughter’s helmet."

    Preaching to the choir, but I can't believe SOP isn't to kill these people, in Fallujah, Mogadishu, wherever shouldn't matter. Young, old, female, male, you're prancing around on burning allied equipment, dragging bodies, you should be dead.

    In most cases it wouldn't even require anything other than a UAV and smart bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  102. No one has been found guilty at Haditha. It's just an investigation. I believe in America, and that the system works.

    An example was when those wounded prisoners were shot by US Marines inside a mosque, the ones filmed by Kevin Sites. At the time, some said the Marines would never have a fair chance, and the investigation would be rigged against them because of the political pressure.

    However what really happened was that the investigation cleared the Marines of all charges against them. The system worked.

    "The corporal reasonably believed that [the wounded Iraqi] posed a hostile threat to him and his fellow marines and justifiably fired in self-defense. The enhanced videotape of the shooting supports the corporal's claim that the wounded [combatant] was concealing his left arm behind his head." - U.S. Marine Corps, May 4, 2005.

    ReplyDelete
  103. > When they are faced with crappy rules of engagement (like in every war), the troops change them or disobey them, whatever it takes to win.

    Those are my words, and I wanted to emphasize that I said "change them or". I am talking about officers working within the system to change the rules. I was not saying that the problem is solved just by noncoms and enlisted men disobeying their rules of engagement.

    ReplyDelete
  104. The Haditha Marines are at trial, now.

    Just like Border Patrolmen.

    The fellow waving the helmet of that British lovely, not a target.
    Has not been for over three years.

    No weapon in hand.

    Policemen in Iraq.
    Bustin' up the Army, for that.

    47 recruits, $62,000 net after tax bonus.

    Jr joined the Guard, last week, he has an achievable Goal. 28 credit hours and 28 recruits, next year.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Wu Wei,

    re: No one has been found guilty at Haditha. It's just an investigation. I believe in America, and that the system works.

    WW, that is so not cool.

    Who needs a trial when we have the expert squirts at the EB.

    ReplyDelete
  106. wu, the US is not at war with Iran.
    Nor really with hezzbollah.

    But not at all with Iran.
    Not by Law, today.
    None made public, anyway.

    Hezzbollah is strongest in Lebanon, the US is in no war there.
    The triCorner region of South America.
    No US war there, though Hezzbollah is.
    Venezuela, where Hezzbollah is provided forged documentation and both recieves and provides training? No War there.

    There may be a War of Words. Professor Lewis may expound
    Mr Perle may have ideas
    And Mr Bush can be quoted.

    But the US is not at War.
    It is attempting a reconciliation.

    ReplyDelete
  107. > Your 1:35 only supports Rat's complaint: That was the Falluja one-off.

    What is the point, that there should never be investigations?

    What about the case of the alleged rape / murder of the Iraqi teen, supposedly led by a soldier who had been discharged from the Army for a personality disorder? Was it wrong to investigate that? Are there groups which say it is a frame up, and it was self defense?

    Almost every action we take, some Iraqi comes forward and says that civilians were killed. Yet very few of those end up going as far as the mosque incident, and even fewer end up in court martials and trials. That seems to be a sign that the system is fair.

    ReplyDelete
  108. > All ROE - and any changes thereto - local or theater, must be vetted by JAG.

    Does the JAG have a commanding officer? Follow some sort of written rules by senior lawyers and commanders?

    If there's a problem, fix it.

    ReplyDelete
  109. The problem, wu, is the system. Mr Rumsfeld said on FOX and was quoted, so it'd be out there somewhere, that he could not understand the Rules, as they were sent out of the Pentagon to the Commanders in the field.

    But they were outside his pervue.
    They are the legal basis of the Policies we engage in.
    Promoting Civil Authority. Not war fighting. The War has been over for years. The civil unrest, sectarian and gang violence is not and will not end soon.

    It is a criminal and political problem, without a military solution. Read General P, he's been profound in his statements.

    Read the bing west piece, he explains it in detail.

    ReplyDelete
  110. > The fellow waving the helmet of that British lovely, not a target.
    Has not been for over three years.

    What about the little tyke in the left corner who looks more like he's ready to cry, holding up something? Should he be a target too?

    This isn't an Al Qaeda photo, it is taken by Associated Press. Should they be targets, or forbidden to take pictures?

    ReplyDelete
  111. The same things happened in World War II. The book "Catch-22" was written by a WW II pilot, and the bureaucracy is the same. It's the same in large organizations like businesses all over the world.

    What's going on with the UK hostages right now is exactly like something in "Catch-22". A mission gets screwed up, so the generals cover it up by giving everyone medals instead of admitting it was a mistake.

    Petraeus is the one who can get ROE changed. If the Bush Administration stands in the way, which I doubt it will, then Petraeus needs to go before Congress and say we will lose the war because of the ROE. It would be tough, but that's why he gets the big bucks and has the four stars. But before he can do that, the word needs to get passed up the chain of command to him.

    ReplyDelete
  112. In the Summer of 1993 there was little doubt in Mr Dick Cheney's mind as to what was required, before going to War.

    I don't think that advocates of U.S. military force to end the bloodshed in Bosnia Iraq have properly considered what would be entailed. Before you commit U.S. forces, there are certain questions you need to be able to answer. You need an objective that you can define in military terms. Our military knows how to liberate a country, destroy a navy, take down an air force; those are militarily achievable objectives. But if you say, "Go in and stop the bloodshed in Bosnia/ Iraq," that's not sufficiently clear to build a mission around. Does that mean you're going to put a U.S. soldier between every Bosnian Serb/ Iraqi Shia," and Bosnian Muslim? // Iraqi Sunni,"

    A second requirement is to specify rules of engagement. The soldier or marine in the trenches needs ground rules -- what we call "rules of engagement" -- about how he is to achieve his mission. Whom does he shoot? How much force can he use, and under what circumstances? That's very difficult to define in this nebulous kind of civil war that's been raging in Bosnia
    / Iraq," . Who's the enemy? And how do you tell the good guys from the bad guys? Is this a three-sided conflict among Serb, Muslim, and Croat, or a two-sided conflict between Muslim and Serb? That's never been very well defined.

    You also need to know what constitutes victory. How would you define it? How would you know when you had achieved it? And finally, how do you get out? What's the end game? How do you wrap it all up? And what's the cost in terms of American lives in that involvement? Nobody answered these questions with respect to Bosnia.

    Is there any reason to expect that an age-old conflict based on animosities that go back for hundreds of years is going to be ameliorated or ended by the temporary presence of U.S. military force? I don't think so. And for all of those reasons, I was, and still am, very reluctant to see us rely on U.S. forces to solve Bosnia's problems. I am afraid we would have an ill-defined mission, we would take significant casualties, and would get involved without knowing how we were going to get out.


    Such growth of what is acceptable Mission Creep, from 1993 to 2007, from the premier GOP spokesman

    ReplyDelete
  113. wu wei,

    re: Haditha

    The investigations on the mission in Haditha have concluded. Charges have been brought. The government of the United States in the form of the Marine Corps believes that sufficient evidence exists to bring the Marines to trial. At trial, the government will have to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the Marines are in fact guilty as charged. Failing that, the Marines will go free.

    As to "60 Minutes", I can understand how opinionated people would go there for military advice. When I think "military", I think first of the Cronkite/Rather network. Their track record of objectivity is unparalleled.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Appendix E: Rules of Engagement for U.S. Military Forces in Iraq
    Issued by U.S. Central Command Combined Forces Land Component Commander

    A laminated card with the following text was distributed to all U.S. Army and Marine personnel in Iraq.

    CFLCC ROE CARD

    On order, enemy military and paramilitary forces are declared hostile and may be attacked subject to the following instructions:
    a) Positive identification (PID) is required prior to engagement. PID is a reasonable certainty that the proposed target is a legitimate military target. If no PID, contact your next higher commander for decision

    b) Do not engage anyone who has surrendered or is out of battle due to sickness or wounds.

    c) Do not target or strike any of the following except in self-defense to protect yourself, your unit, friendly forces, and designated persons or property under your control:


    Civilians


    Hospitals, mosques, national monuments, and any other historical and cultural sites.

    d) Do not fire into civilian populated areas or buildings unless the enemy is using them for military purposes or if necessary for your self-defense. Minimize collateral damage.

    e) Do not target enemy infrastructure (public works, commercial communication facilities, dams), Lines of Communication (roads, highways, tunnels, bridges, railways) and Economic Objects (commercial storage facilities, pipelines) unless necessary for self-defense or if ordered by your commander. If you must fire on these objects to engage a hostile force, disable and disrupt but avoid destruction of these objects, if possible.

    The use of force, including deadly force, is authorized to protect the following:

    Yourself, your unit, and friendly forces


    Enemy Prisoners of War


    Civilians from crimes that are likely to cause death or serious bodily harm, such as murder or rape


    Designated civilians and/or property, such as personnel of the Red Cross/Crescent, UN, and US/UN supported organizations

    3. Treat all civilians and their property with respect and dignity. Do not seize civilian property, including vehicles, unless you have the permission of a company level commander and you give a receipt to the property’s owner.

    Detain civilians if they interfere with mission accomplishment or if required for self-defense.
    CENTCOM General Order No. 1A remains in effect. Looting and the taking of war trophies are prohibited.
    REMEMBER

    Attack enemy forces and military targets.
    Spare civilians and civilian property, if possible.
    Conduct yourself with dignity and honor.
    Comply with the Law of War. If you see a violation, report it.
    These ROE will remain in effect until your commander orders you to transition to post-hostilities ROE.

    AS OF 311330Z JAN 03

    ReplyDelete
  115. 60 minutes provide the SSgt's persepective. It is his statements that are germane.

    The Corps has made it's position clear, the E3s are on trial.

    I hope thet are released.
    Seems to me they should be.
    Seems to the Corps they should be in jail, or at least be put in jeopordy of such a fate.

    ReplyDelete
  116. "Failing that, the Marines will go free."
    ---
    After having their lives turned inside out and upside down.
    ...for serving their country.

    ReplyDelete
  117. "The Haditha Marines are at trial, now.

    Just like Border Patrolmen.
    "
    ---
    BIG DEAL!
    ...you should expect to have to pay dearly for doing your job.
    ...unless you partake in the Conventional Corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Wu, the legal risks run by shooters in the current campaigns cannot be overstated.

    And unless they've got some top cover, there is no ready defense against exposure to prosecution.
    ---
    Which means many second guess themselves and DIE.

    ReplyDelete
  119. " That seems to be a sign that the system is fair."
    ---
    RIGHT:
    Unless Time or Kevin Sites decides to F... your life, in which case MCYA goes into effect.
    (Massive CYA)

    ReplyDelete
  120. "c) Do not target or strike any of the following except in self-defense to protect yourself, your unit, friendly forces, and designated persons or property under your control:

    Civilians

    Hospitals, mosques, national monuments, and any other historical and cultural sites."
    ---
    Yet Marines DIED rather than defend themselves re: a mosque and sniper.

    ROE Creep.

    ReplyDelete
  121. 'Rat's, rules are NOT WWII rules, Wu, Catch 22 or not.

    ReplyDelete
  122. But, hey, the guys that are there say the Rules are Fucked,
    What do THEY Know?

    (course Yon might be an Al Jiz Operative)

    ReplyDelete
  123. > Wu, the legal risks run by shooters in the current campaigns cannot be overstated.

    > And unless they've got some top cover, there is no ready defense against exposure to prosecution.

    > Which means many second guess themselves and DIE.

    This is serious, but I don't understand how the Commanders could support the marines and soldiers in the field any more than they are, other than saying that there will never be an investigation at all.

    Maybe word of the trials and investigations doesn't leak out, but I am not aware of anysoldiers or marines who are believed to have been wrongly convicted in this Iraq War. I have only heard of a couple of cases that got a lot of publicity like the one with Kevin Sides, and the Marines were found innocent there.

    Starting in Afghanistan, it is standard procedure for insurgents to say that every US attack killed civilians. Yet I have not heard of large numbers of troops going through deep investigations, and going to trial.

    I believe in our troops, but unless I see proof otherwise, I believe the Marine Commanders, etc. aren't putting their innocent troops in jail.

    ReplyDelete
  124. we wei,

    re: Starting in Afghanistan, it is standard procedure for insurgents to say that every US attack killed civilians. Yet I have not heard of large numbers of troops going through deep investigations, and going to trial.

    Bingo!

    ReplyDelete
  125. How's this for a diverse pov; out of 147 comments:

    Doug - 66
    DR - 33

    Those two comprise 67% of all comments; now the also rans:

    Wu Wei - 19
    2164 7
    Mat 7
    Trish 6
    Cutler 4
    Allen 3
    Trish 1
    missed 1

    At his point, BC has a far more diverse crowd, with no dominant pov. The EB simply fronts for DR, a blowhard verbal bully who no one would put up with in person.

    DR, why do you monopolize someone else's blog instead of creating your own? You seem reasonably web adept; you can embed YouTube videos and run a business website. You reckon anyone would ever visit and tolerate your intolerant, arrogant and cynical pov, if you ran your own blog?

    ReplyDelete