“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."

Sunday, January 13, 2008

George Soros, Democrat, and Baby He Ain't Alone.

While the Cardinals of the Republican Party are trashing fellow Republicans, the Democratic machine is preparing to imbed itself in a way that will make a mockery of the Hugh Hewitt model of a permanent Republican majority. From lax voting rules, Supreme Court judges, and some very scary big money liberals, the Democrats are going to pummel the remains of the Reagan legacy. For a hint of the future, take a peek at the past.

January 13, 2008
Anti-war Soros funded Iraq study

Brendan Montague Financial Times

A STUDY that claimed 650,000 people were killed as a result of the invasion of Iraq was partly funded by the antiwar billionaire George Soros.

Soros, 77, provided almost half the £50,000 cost of the research, which appeared in The Lancet, the medical journal. Its claim was 10 times higher than consensus estimates of the number of war dead.

The study, published in 2006, was hailed by antiwar campaigners as evidence of the scale of the disaster caused by the invasion, but Downing Street and President George Bush challenged its methodology.

New research published by The New England Journal of Medicine estimates that 151,000 people - less than a quarter of The Lancet estimate - have died since the invasion in 2003.

“The authors should have disclosed the [Soros] donation and for many people that would have been a disqualifying factor in terms of publishing the research,” said Michael Spagat, economics professor at Royal Holloway, University of London.

The Lancet study was commissioned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and led by Les Roberts, an associate professor and epidemiologist at Columbia University. He reportedly opposed the war from the outset.

His team surveyed 1,849 homes at 47 sites across Iraq, asking people about births, deaths and migration in their households.

Professor John Tirman of MIT said this weekend that $46,000 (£23,000) of the approximate £50,000 cost of the study had come from Soros’s Open Society Institute.

Roberts said this weekend: “In retrospect, it was probably unwise to have taken money that could have looked like it would result in a political slant. I am adamant this could not have affected the outcome of the research.”

The Lancet did not break any rules by failing to disclose Soros’s sponsorship.


  1. Lancet merely published the results of a MIT study.

    There are few "rules" in publishing. In the US next to none. Save by tort for libel.
    No one was libeled by reporting the MIT study.

    Well, there is now McCain-Feingold for political writings close to elections, when they could impact results.

    Passed by a Republican dominated Congress, signed by Bush43.

    Look to realities, amigos, not projections of closely held beliefs, when assessing the nature of politics around the world.

  2. The Hillary Film an ADVERTISEMENT, restricted under McCain-Feingold, passed on by Bush F..... Up Royally by the Supremes, not doing the job Bush didn't do,

  3. Hi,

    I begin on internet with a directory