Looking at George Bush last night was not reassuring. If reassurance is what you needed, both you and the President had a bad night.All day yesterday, MSNBC, played and re-played the "mission accomplished" tape of a youthful, confident, triumphant Bush. The scenes of young sailors and marines cheering a winner and a President on top was tough to watch. The moment of a national common purpose and American optimism has come and gone and the carrier scene is a hard reminder. Last night The President's face was far different from the man in the aviator's uniform.
George Bush must be a notoriously bad poker player. He would have to wear a ten gallon hat and mirrored aviator glasses to at least stay in the game. He was wearing neither last night and needed both. George Bush is a worried man.
Bush is losing political allies as fast as new presidential candidates appear. He has lost both houses of Congress and the Democrats are wasting little time in reminding him and the rest of the world how little time he has left. When you play against a man with little time, you play for time. Time is at the top of the list of President Bush's enemies. Bush knows it and so do all his enemies and he has cultivated and engendered many.
Any defensive strategist in Iraq or the Democratic Party is going to run out the clock. Bush has no strategy for that. Had he been a better student of history, he would have known that patience was not an American virtue. His enemies are not handicapped by time.
The new Iraq strategy as I understand it, is all based on time and the action of al-Maliki. Maliki is to be tough and resolute. No more being nice to the militias and the little round black eyed Muqtada al-Sadr. The plan is predicated upon the US losing patience and Maliki is to act before his time runs out. It seems to me that Maliki is keenly aware of the time and is not going to do anything that is going to get him killed when someone else's time runs out. That strategy is not going to work. It will not work, because there is no one standing behind Bush that is talking about picking up the flag and charging forward when time is called on Bush. I was reminded of the President's father looking at his watch during one of the debates with Clinton. Well, GWB may as well have done the same thing last night as everyone knows he is watching the clock.
No, the time strategy will not work. Something far simpler and dramatic would be more effective. There is only one power that is benefiting from the mess in Iraq and that is Iran. Bush removed the natural enemy to Iran with the deposing of Saddam and the fragmentation of Iraq. Saddam went to the gallows refusing to believe that Bush could not have noticed that. Saddam's last words were, "Who is Muqtada?" He went out cursing the Iranians. Saddam knew the real enemy, but time ran out for him as well. I wonder if the President noticed?
I know what I would do, but am far more interested in what you would do? Tell us. Will this strategy work? If not, what would?
In the land between the Tigris and the Euphrates, time belongs to our opponents, not to us. We, not they, need closure. Our time is determined by American election cycles. They operate on "God's time." If they do not win today, or even fight today, there are many tomorrows -- for them, but not for us. If Iraq is still a mess and there is no end in sight a year from now, George Bush is in trouble.
ReplyDeleteThe fly has occupied the flypaper. And time is always on the flypaper's side.
-William Lind,
Of Time And The Rivers,
May 29, 2003.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush was upset after watching the video of Saddam Hussein's execution, comparing it to how he felt after seeing the photographs of Iraqi prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, White House officials said Wednesday.
ReplyDeleteDark, grainy video -- apparently recorded on a cell phone -- of Hussein's December 30 hanging was leaked to the media soon after the execution.
In the video, taunts from Shiites can be heard moments before Hussein, a Sunni, is hanged.
After Hussein offers prayers, the guards shout praise for Muqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shiite cleric whose father is believed to have been murdered by Hussein's regime.
They chant, "Muqtada! Muqtada! Muqtada!"
U.S. forces raid Iranian consulate in Iraq
ReplyDeleteReuters
Thursday, January 11, 2007; 6:50 AM
"ARBIL, Iraq (Reuters) - U.S. forces raided the Iranian consulate office in the northern Iraqi city of Arbil on Thursday and arrested five employees, the official Iranian news agency IRNA said.
There was no immediate comment by the U.S. military on the raid which came hours after President George W. Bush vowed in a speech to interrupt what he called the "flow of support" from Iran and Syria for insurgent attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq.
The raid was the second such operation in the past month against Iranian interests in Iraq by U.S. forces."
"Will this strategy work? If not, what would?"
ReplyDeleteIt's a short run strategy. As with previous such, it can achieve (very) short term objectives. As with previous such, the pertinent question is, "Then what?" And this is where the President's instincts fail him most gravely - again and again and again. THIS MUST BE HANDED OVER. AS IS. Yesterday is preferrable. Toute de suite will have to do.
And the genius that reintroduced the (fateful and fatal) "no cut and run" mantra back in 2004 needs to be left to the tender mercies of Grinning Lyndie England.
It's called Declaring Victory and Coming Home, you son of a bitch. Whoever and wherever you are.
I believe that the bandits over there were counting on an announcement of withdrawal. If they listen to the BBC, they have been told that Americans were motivated by oil revenues and that now they have given up in the face of a determined insurgency and are willing to leave Iraq to the wolves.
ReplyDeleteThere is plenty of time for withdrawal, but I believe my friends on the ground over there who have been begging for a change in the ROE for years. They tell me they have never been allowed to follow through, that local politicians put known bandits off limits, and that they could be most effective if they were simply allowed to do their jobs as soldiers first, humanitarians second, and not the other way around.
I have long maintained that the clock has been controlled by the fascists, and sympathize with moniker for this thread and Fellow Peace's post. It appears to me now that for a few short months, it might be controlled by us. We might set priorities, launch missions, and follow through until we determine it is time to pull back.
For now, I am with the new plan, and I think Turban Durbin should be ashamed of himself for pandering so disgustingly to the buzz-word philosophy of the left at the expense of the realities on the ground. Let's hope that progress can be made, that Maliki, or a successor, is able to engage with a sense of urgency and accomplish what has to be done.
If not, farewell to the Purple Fingers that were the first seeds of self-determination in a millenium in the region, and hello Mogadishue
powerful post, roadtoserfdom.
ReplyDeleteThe next time we've got a mind to do something felony-stupid like this, we would do well to state flatly to those sent to do the job, "Don't come back 'til it's done. No leave. No redeployment. No rotation." This provides incentive to clearly define the job; prevent the propagation of new and additional jobs; and to limit the endeavor in time.
ReplyDeleteThe potential downside: More Haditha's. But even this would lead back to a certain truth we've struggled mightily for 50 years to avoid: Ain't no such thing as a Humanitarian War.
So, so funny.
ReplyDeleteThe seeds sowed three years ago have all produced crops. As predicted.
Now even the President and Mr Bartlett say the US has imposed Rules of Engagement in Iraq that are not in the best interest of the US troopers.
Now, a "good Plan" is still beyond reach, because the Enemy, while now mentioned is still not targeted. We will try to "localize" Iraq from the Region.
Sanctuaries will still be in place in Iran and Syria. As well as Jordan and KSA.
Cpl Jason Dunham's family, his mother, just recieved the Medal of Honor. Young man dove on a grenade, to save his fire team.
He died so Mr Maliki can reconcile Iraqis.
What a waste of a fine US Marine.
Meanwhile, little black kids are kicked off a school bus and no longer are allowed to ride on a language academy bus, because they speak english.
What a waste of an empty bus seat.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteTrish, I think you are right about the 'just leave' part. Changing the ROE's, getting more Hadithas in the process, and waging 'total war' sounds nice and easy but to what end? Who the heck are we fighting against? What nation need we conquer in Iraq in order for peace to reign?
ReplyDeleteAs I quoted over at Belmont Brooks madea good point in his editorial today at the NYT:
" Nonetheless, here’s my reconstruction of how this policy evolved:
On Nov. 30, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki presented Bush with a new security plan for Baghdad. It called for U.S. troops to move out of Baghdad to the periphery, where they would chase down Sunni terrorists. Iraqi Shiite and Kurdish troops, meanwhile, would flood into the city to establish order, at least as they define it.
Maliki essentially wanted the American troops protecting his flank but out of his hair. He didn’t want U.S. soldiers embedded with his own. He didn’t want American generals hovering over his shoulder. His government didn’t want any restraints on Shiite might.
Over the next weeks, Bush rejected the plan and opted for the opposite approach. Instead of handing counterinsurgency over to the Iraqis/Shiites, he decided to throw roughly 20,000 U.S. troops — everything he had available — into Baghdad. He and his advisers negotiated new rules of engagement to make it easier to go after Shiites as well as Sunnis. He selected two aggressive counterinsurgency commanders, David Petraeus and Raymond Odierno, to lead the effort. Odierno recently told John Burns of The Times that American forces would remain in cleared areas of Baghdad “24/7,” suggesting a heavy U.S. presence.
Then came the job of selling the plan. The administration could not go before the world and say that the president had decided to overrule the sovereign nation of Iraq. Officials could not tell wavering Republicans that the president was proposing a heavy, U.S.-led approach.
Thus, administration officials are saying that they have adopted the Maliki plan, just with a few minor tweaks. In briefings and in the president’s speech, officials claimed that this was an Iraqi-designed plan, that Iraqi troops would take on all the primary roles in clearing and holding neighborhoods, that Iraqis in mixed neighborhoods would scarcely see any additional Americans.
All of this is designed to soothe the wounded pride of the Maliki government, and to make the U.S. offensive seem less arduous at home. It’s the opposite of the truth.
Yesterday, administration officials were praising Maliki lavishly. He wants the same things we want, they claimed. He has resolved to lead a nonsectarian government. He is reworking his governing coalitions and marginalizing the extremists. “We’ve seen the nascent rise of a moderate political bloc,” one senior administration official said yesterday.
But the selling of the plan illustrates that this is not the whole story. The Iraqi government wants a unified non-sectarian solution in high-minded statements and in some distant, ideal world. But in the short term, and in the deepest reptilian folds of their brains, the Shiites are maneuvering amid the sectarian bloodbath all around.
This is not a function of the character of Maliki or this or that official. It’s a function of the core dynamic now afflicting Iraqi society.
The enemy in Iraq is not some discrete group of killers. It’s the maelstrom of violence and hatred that infects every institution, including the government and the military. Instead of facing up to this core reality, the Bush administration has papered it over with salesmanship and spin. "
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/opinion/11brooks.html?hp
There is only one plan that can work, It is apparent to the merest idiot that Democracy cannot work in an Islamic nation.
ReplyDeleteSo we must settle for a partial victory in Iraq. Concentrate the troops in defensible bases in the north including at least two airbases, establish solid logistic support, quit training people we may have to fight later, let the Saudi Sunnis fund arms for their desperate bretheren in Iraq, provoke Iran to try to strike first. Force Israel to take out Syrian regime and armed forces.
This will probably only work if the Iranians have not already bought nukes from the Russians, If that is the case it should be preemptive strikes sufficiently wide spread to make it infeasible for Iran to continue to exist as a modern nation, I have no idea how to find out if they have the nukes though...
"Concentrate the troops in defensible bases in the north including at least two airbases, establish solid logistic support, quit training people we may have to fight later, let the Saudi Sunnis fund arms for their desperate bretheren in Iraq, provoke Iran to try to strike first. Force Israel to take out Syrian regime and armed forces."
ReplyDeleteOkay, then. What the fuck would we be accomplishing as sqatters in the north?
We are shit magnets sitting there like that, dave. And without a damn thing productive to do.
One thing, Deuce;
ReplyDeleteA lot of poker tournaments have turned around when a desperate short-stack started going "all-in," and Winning.
Other than defending the world's sixth largest petroleum reserves, for example, we wouldn't be doing much. Oh, we would also be within speedy striking distance of most of the regions players.
ReplyDeleteWhat is to be done with a leader who leads his country to defeat. Just asking, since defeat seems now the conventional wisdom.
ReplyDeleteI just can't understand the "Defeat" meme, though. We Won the "War," quickly, and handily.
ReplyDeleteI guess we might fail in our attempt to turn Iraq into "Iowa," but, hey, it was a long-shot from the start, right?
Look at it this way, "At least Iraq isn't as dangerous as New Orleans."
ReplyDeleteThat part about the Patriot Missiles is Important. We're overlooking it, but you can be sure Iran isn't.
ReplyDeleteThat, plus the rhetoric, plus the raids, PLUS Those TWO BIG OLD AIRCRAFT CARRIERS are definitely a "message" that Iran should be "getting."
i haven't visit here in a while. A man can stand only so much!
ReplyDeleteStill I feel compelled to add one additional factor to the Iran mix and that's the "accident" in the straits of Hormuz.
A US fast Attack submarine "collides" with a full Japanese Tanker: The Newport News and the somebody or other maru.
This on the heels of a devasting article about Iran's prior efforts in the straits. November issue of commentary, but Arthur Herman. He reminds us, and the Iranians that we'd patrolled the straits and thwarted Iranian efforts during the Iran/Iraq war. The article is an interesting read. Sort of Tom Clancy fast forward to NOW.
If I were an Iranian military leader I'd be worried about a few things:
(1) Can I get myself and my concubines out of the country before I have an "auto accident" or go down in a "Plane Crash"?
(2) Do these guys REALLY think that the 12th Iman is gonna save their asses?
(3) If not me and my concubines, how about just me?
If, rufus, Mr Bush had started to withdraw, after the Mission Accomplished speach on the Carrier, well then, we'd have won.
ReplyDeleteBut Mr Bush did not do that. He did not declare Victory, instead he changed the Mission.
He changed the Mission and that "new" war has not gone well.
Catch & Release
No Justice, No Peace
It's hard to gaze into this crystal ball and have anything come up with clarity, but I think if we leave, Iran owns southern Iraq. Who or what is to stop them? Saddam? They can probably run it the way they choose, simply through money,guns,assassinations, without sending in their army. A line gets drawn somewhere in the desert probably a little north of Bahgdad, after the sunnis take a real licking, and who knows about Kurdistan. This all seems like a bad outcome to me, full of danger down the line. Wish I could channel the future somehow
ReplyDeleteI'm telling you, those Patriot Missiles are important. They're not saying for sure that something's going to happen; but, THEY'RE SAYING, "WE'RE GETTING READY, JUST IN CASE."
ReplyDeleteFive helicopters carried US forces to pre-dawn raid of Iranian consulate in N. Iraqi town of Irbil. They were dropped on the roof while armored vehicles encircled the building. The troops used loudspeakers to call out in Farsi and Arabic to the consulate staff not to resist “or else they would be killed.” Five Iranian diplomatic staff members were detained and documents and computers impounded.
ReplyDeleteTehran has strongly protested this breach of its sovereign territory and summoned the Swiss ambassador who represents US interests in Iran and the Iraqi ambassador to demand the immediate release of the Iranian diplomats.
Later Thursday, Jan. 11, Tehran reported three large explosions shaking the southern town of Khorramshahr north of the oil port of Abadan on the Shatt al-Arb waterway.
Khorramshahr, which faces the Iraqi town of Basra, is one of the key towns from which Iran delivers smuggled fighters, weapons and explosives to its Shiite supporters in Iraq. Sources also report that some hours before President George W. Bush’s policy speech, a series of explosions were heard in Iranian Balochistan. Tehran imposed a blackout on the incident.
"Confronting Iran and Syria for “allowing networks to use their territory to attack US forces?”
Guy, I'm telling you, I have Been there, done this
ReplyDeleteFifty years, ago. exactly.
one hell of an interview rufus.
ReplyDelete"US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said that Iraqi PM Nouri Maliki is living "on borrowed time", but that she is confident he can give Iraq security.
ReplyDeleteMs Rice was testifying to a Senate hearing about President Bush's new Iraq strategy, announced on Wednesday."
There is a confidence builder if I ever heard one.
Well, at least they quit referring to Iran as being, "Unhelpful."
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThat Iranian counsulate is in Irbil, a Kurdish town near the Turkey - Iran border. This puts it outside the meddlesome reach of Mr. Maliki and the Shi'a.
ReplyDeleteBoy, I hope our good friends the Turks haven't misbehaved.
Sitting at the Center of the World
ReplyDeleteTalk about your "Tough Neighborhoods."
ReplyDeleteHow high are those mountains, again?
Old Kurdish saying:
ReplyDelete"The Mountains are the only friends the Kurdish People have."
Most lefty pundits bring up the WMD issue as an intel. failure. The true failure was not anticipating the level and type of Iranian intervention and thusly having no plan to deal with the same. We didnt have enough boots on the ground to start with much less to shut down the western and eastern borders.
ReplyDeleteRed -
ReplyDeleteYou're on to something with those Patriots. They're not cheap, and there are not so many of them that can can simply deploy them like pup tents. These are precious.
I think that's very big.
re: mountains
ReplyDeleteHigh enough make infantry assault suicidal. Without air support, any incursion by Iraq, Iran, Syria, or Turkey would be by infantry. That is why Saddam didn't try after the no-fly zone was established.
All that is lacking is a seaport. Iran or Syria could remedy that - preferably Syria north of Aleppo on the Mediterranean.
While little remarked, Kurdistan controls the essential watersheds of the entire region.
Trish, what I proposes would establish a military force situated on good defensive ground, in position to interdict any attempted arms/troops flow to Syria, the Iranis probably could not tolerate it and would be forced to attack with ground troops which would have extended supply lines, highly vulnerable to air power. The big risk to such an operation would be if the Iranis possess and use nuclear weapons, then they have a delivery problem and nothing much to gain except National obliteration if they secceeded in a very difficult delivery.
ReplyDeleteIf Israel destroyed the regime in Syria but made no effort to replace it with anything, just established a big air base in a strategic location and cleaned up the Bekka valley, the vast majority of their difficulties in Palestine and Lebannon would probably just dry up and blow away.
I do not judge that either in the Bush administration or Israel there exists a set of politicians with the cojones to implement such a policy.
In the long run the Democratic idiots who will be in power in Washington for an unknown period are going to be forced to use H-bombs not just tactical nukes, they will wind up turning large portions of the ME to glassy parking lots, only there will not be any survivors to park on them.
A scenario like or on the lines of the one I outlined, would in effect force Iran to capitulate or die, I know some Iranis, they are smart folks I don't think they will choose death.
Oil, water, defensible borders, a friendly Western leaning population, air fields, mountain passes, pipelines - what more could a guy want. And did I mention within slapping distance of the regions other players.
ReplyDeleteLocation. Location. Location.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteAllen you said: "Boy, I hope our good friends the Turks haven't misbehaved."
ReplyDeleteI have a question for you. What did they do for us lately?
Roadie, there's no way we could let any kind of attack on Iran go forward without guarding our Big Bases and some of the Oil Fields, including those in Saudi Arabia and kuwait, from Missile attack.
ReplyDeleteThis doesn't make an attack on Iran "inevitable," but it does make it "Possible."
I think president Bush could be on to something with his latest plan. The elected government is predominantly Shiite so they will control the country if violence stopped today or if we left today and they 'sorted things out' by themselves. All the players want us to leave. If Maliki could convince the Shiite militias to lay down arms or even join the IA for a couple months there would be only one enemy combatant force left to deal with. If the Baathist/foreign militant group can't be convinced to give up the fight, the combined US/Iraqi armies would eliminate them, peace could be declared and victory celebrated.
ReplyDeleteOil at $52/barrel.Warmer weather in east,and other places too. Maybe we will see $2 gas.
ReplyDelete"Sources in Jerusalem" say the Chinese are more willing than before to support sanctions aimed at retarding Tehran's nuclear program--in part because of the efforts of the Saudis:
ReplyDeleteWhile China is heavily dependent on Iran for oil, importing roughly 300,000 barrels of Iranian crude a day, that dependence is not as great today as it was a year ago.
In January 2006, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah, who diplomatic officials in Jerusalem have said is as concerned about a nuclear Iran as Israel, went to China and reportedly told the Chinese leadership that Saudi Arabia would make up for any oil shortfall that might arise were the Iranians to cut back oil to China as punishment for sanctions.
from: Opinionjournal.com
This is not good news for Iran.
dave h,
ReplyDeleteMadame Rice has an impeccable record for picking friends; just look at Fatah and Abu Abbas. If she says Turkey is our friend, then, Turkey must be our friend.
rufus,
ReplyDeleteDon't misunderstand, any pressure brought to bear on Iran by the Chinese is welcome; however, the growing power of Saudi Arabia is equally troubling to me.
Allen said, "High enough make infantry assault suicidal. Without air support, any incursion by Iraq, Iran, Syria, or Turkey would be by infantry"
ReplyDeleteAnd we all know since the days of the Beirut barracks bombing, reinforced by the USS Cole and 911, that Muslims are loth to engage in suicidal attacks.
The United States recently provided Mr. Abbas and his Fatah 3,000 M-16s and one million rounds of ammunition, to be used against Hamas. Furthermore, the President has asked Congress to approve an emergency aid package of $86 million to Fatah, again to assist it against Hamas. And what does Mr. Abbas do:
ReplyDeleteAbbas Calls to Attack Israel, AP Ignores It
Yes, Dr. Rice can pick America’s friends.
Heck with those "little" operations, the Iran/Iraq War proved the Iranians ability to send cannon fodder to slaughter.
ReplyDeleteA suicidal attack into Kurdistan, by any of the countries listed, would be welcome. Of course, attacking armed men is not the Muslim style, so I will not hold my breath awaiting the attack.
ReplyDeleteYes, the sort of mindless slaughter of the Iran-Iraq war is what I would see happening in Kurdistan. Something tells me the Kurds would not object.
ReplyDelete"What did they do for us lately?"
ReplyDeleteMuch like Italy: No Turkey, no TWAT. They're an anchor operationally. They're NATO.
Are the Kurds going to pay us to babysit them?
(Your Kurd-love, allen, is just damned strange.)
trish,
ReplyDeleteI just love geography.
trish,
ReplyDeleteShould we ever decide to have a shooting war with Iran, the Kurds provide security for our left flank, assuming the US moves assets from Iraq. By closing the passes in the north and endangering Iran's petroleum distribution system in that region, Iran will be forced to take countermeasures from the south. The Kurds are a force multiplier. As with the anti-Russian Afghan fighters, not much "babysitting" will be necessary - just a steady flow of intelligence and munitions.
Do I detect antipathy on your part?
For the life of me, I can't understand many of the actions of our government, or the Israeli government. We send guns to Fatah to be used against Hamas, the Israelis provide(least this is what I read) the electricity(and monies too) to the Gazans. I know, the idea is to strengthen the saner party there, but this never seems to work out. Some kind of new approach is needed. The Israelis sit there as rockets fly in once a week, and pay the electricity bills. It just doesn't compute to me.
ReplyDeleteBobalharb, I liked Krauthammer's idea, program some howitzers to automatically fire five rounds every time a radar detects a rocket from Gaza. Takes the morality out of the equation, and makes it more like the Palestinians banging their head on a brick wall, only more painful.
ReplyDeleteWas it ever about revenge?
ReplyDeleteTwo problems solved in one: avenge the embassy bombings and the deaths of the American soldiers in the 1993 Black Hawk Down incident. Secondly, bring government, peace and stability to Somalia, lawless since 1991. "Somalia's first piece of potentially good news in two devastating decades," wrote one columnist. The realities of Somalia were ignored.
The President needs to convene a council of Hip-Hop artists to raise awareness in our urban centers. They are at the vanguard of our culture, and the Bush Admin has rebuffed 50 Cent's show of support, and left Kanye West's rhetoric eerily unanswered. Do we expect to win WITHOUT OUR CULTURE?
ReplyDeleteSo we must look to those in the hip hop community who have known sacrifice. They toiled through rain, floods, mud, fires, cannibalism, perspiration, depleted fisheries, erosion, indigestion, food poisoning, sores, hatred, prideless parades and an utterly destroyed culture - the reason many refer to it as the LOUISIANIC ATLANTIS.
The great men and women that survived are eager to give to their country, if only their country would let them.
Here's your trigger for a change in ROE:
ReplyDeleteIraq jihadis claim 'chemical rockets'
Al-Ayoubi Brigades release video showing preparation, firing of rockets claimed to contain chemical agent...
Iraq jihadis claim 'chemical rockets'
Al-Ayoubi Brigades release video showing preparation, firing of rockets claimed to contain chemical agent
The message also claimed the rockets struck their targets accurately. In a separate message, released earlier in January, the leader of the "Islamic state of Iraq," declared by al-Qaeda in Iraq , was reported to say that the US "is only beginning to realize its role as a means for Iran to gain control in Iraq with minimal losses."
In the past few months, al-Qaeda in Iraq has begun releasing increasingly hostile rhetoric against Iran and Shiite Muslims in Iraq.
Yep, I agree with you and Krauthammer on that one, T. A simple mathematical equation, makes every thing easily understandable, especially by those that launch the rockets. I agree with Aspergersgenmtleman, as well, with his arcane and insightful logic.
ReplyDeleteWinter Wonderland
ReplyDeleteIn Afghanistan, some Taliban fighters continue to operate through the Winter. But U.S. troops knew how to play the weather to their advantage. U.S. troops have a new set of Winter clothing, based on the latest stuff available to civilian skiers and Winter sports enthusiasts. This gives U.S. troops a big edge when a cold front moves in, and the Taliban are forced to come down to a village, or risk frostbite, or death up in the hills. The Taliban are also easier to track when it snows, and easier to spot from the air using UAVs, or, especially, aircraft equipped with infrared (heat sensing) cameras. Normally, Afghans stay inside, or close to home, throughout the Winters. In the south, it's drier and warmer, but during the Winter months, the occasional bitter cold air comes down from the north, and forces Afghans outside to get inside or die.
On the Afghan theme...
ReplyDeleteUS Intelligence: Pakistan haven for terrorists
US National Intelligence Director John Negroponte said Thursday that Pakistan, while a key ally in the US hunt for terrorists, represents a major source of Islamic extremism and a refuge for top terror leaders.
Negroponte said in testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee that ''eliminating the safe haven that the Taliban and other extremists have found in Pakistan's tribal areas is not sufficient to end the insurgency in Afghanistan, but it is necessary.'' (AP)
Finally, we wonder whether President Musharraf of Pakistan is following the news from Somalia. He might have hoped that the al-Qaeda men currently in Pakistan's mountains might have decamped to Somalia. That will not happen now. With Paksitan's relations with Afghanistan and possibly the U.S. heading downhill, pressure will increase to do something about the Taliban/al-Qaeda sanctuary on Pakistan's territory. It may not be long before the AC-130s range as freely over Waziristan as they do now over southern Somalia.
(Westhawk)
Iraqi MP Iyad Jamal Al-Din: Democracy in the Middle East Can Only Be Established by Force
ReplyDeleteThe following are excerpts from an interview with Iraqi MP Iyad Jamal Al-Din, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on December 28, 2006.
Interviewer: "On what do you base your trust of the U.S. and its plans for the region?"
Iyad Jamal Al-Din: "Democracy is the religion of the dollar and serves its global interests. This dollar has a spirited life - it is dear, honorable, and loveable. It gets vexed real quickly, get it? Dollar has a religion. The religion of the dollar is democracy. This applies to the entire world, because the dollar cannot thrive in dictatorial countries, but only in democracies. For the sake of their global economy, [the Americans] establish democracy.
"We, the oppressed and slaughtered peoples, have seen nothing but stupid dictators or wise dictators. It's one of the two. Wise dictators pave roads and build houses, but they are still dictators. On the other hand, there are stupid dictators, like our friend who has gone. We are very far from democracy. It is inconceivable that we endured this humiliation and tyranny for 1,400 years, yet we are unable to create a democracy. Even after 1,400 years, our culture is still..."
Interviewer: "Democracy has resulted in what is now happening in Iraq."
Iyad Jamal Al-Din: "The result of democracy... We don't know... We are very far from liberty. Do we even know what to do with the values of liberty? The moment Saddam's club was lifted from over our heads, each and every one of us wanted to assume Saddam's personality. We had one Saddam, and now we have six, seven, 10, or 15 Saddams. We now have local mini-Saddams. I said this before the war. I said that America would do us a favor by ridding us of Saddam the dictator, but that this favor would be incomplete unless it rids us of the opposition parties. But this did not happen during the war. These people are photocopies of Saddam. Saddam was in power for 35 years, and so was the leader of this or that opposition party - not only in Iraq, but in all Arab and Islamic countries.
"The opposition is the mirror image of the regime. If we want to simplify matters, how come Hosni Mubarak has ruled for 23 years? I want to rule in his place, not because I want to change the nature of the regime, to make it a democracy, which respects human beings and private property... We are still far from all this. Therefore, in my opinion, democracy can be established in our region only through force. Democracy must be established by force, and only America can do it."
(MEMRI)
"each and every one of us wanted to assume Saddam's personality"--there's the rub, right there.
ReplyDeleteNever been a big Bush fan. The Hainlin Island thing kinda said it all for me. But why all the Bush blame? Isn't blame a childish notion?
ReplyDeleteThe problem has never been Bush but a fickle, impatient, ignorant Amercan electorate. A people gets the press and leaders that it deserves.
History is unkind to the weak and America has grown weak, spoiled and unwilling to do the hard work that is necessary to survive.
The new plan won't work because the American people are unwilling to let soldiers do their grim work nor give them the time to do the work. So, we lose Iraq, the middle east and, in time, Western Civilization. Our grandchildren will kowtow before an Eastern tyrant.
Superpower my ass.
elijah,
ReplyDeleteExcellent catch!
10:42:49--I'd disagree with that. I think most of the people just don't feel threatened yet.
ReplyDeleteDemocracy must be established by force, and only America can do it."
ReplyDeleteSorry, Charlie; America Can't do that.
In my weaker moments, I almost feel sorry for them. In my normal moments, I always feel for the kids there. They got to get rid of that Koran, but they seem stuck with it, and they won't.
ReplyDeleterufus,
ReplyDeleteYou do have to admire the man's honesty, whether you agree with his prescription or not.
Bill Roggio talks about TIME.
ReplyDeleteSure, Allen; It's strange, in a way, how they think of us as "omnipotent." Able to do "Anything."
ReplyDeleteI guess they think, deep down, that we "Want" them to be without power, or security, in that we could, obviously, fix it by "throwing a switch" if that was our desire.
Am I correct? Has Baghdad, other than the whoopass we put on Haifa St., been pretty quiet the last week?
ReplyDeleteNever break the neutrality of a port or place, but never consider as neutral any place from whence an attack is allowed to be made.
ReplyDelete-Horatio Nelson
No captain can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of the enemy.
-Horatio Nelson
Our country will, I believe, sooner forgive an officer for attacking an enemy than for letting it alone.
-Horatio Nelson
If you can look at This without laughing out loud, you're a better man than me, Gunga Din.
ReplyDeleteI laughed, Rufus, so I'm not the better 'gunga din',--but then I looked a little more closely, and began to worry--are those gals..or guys?
ReplyDeleteNo captain can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of the enemy.
ReplyDelete-Horatio Nelson
Zinni in Aden.
That was a fucking plan.
Yes, Rufus, it seems perhaps it has. I think it would be a big mistake to bug out too soon, whatever 'too soon is'.
ReplyDeleteBob, I Really, honest, really don't want to know!
ReplyDeleteReally. honest.
Allen seems to be a Bar patron who maintains a steady balance in response to the events, positive and negative, inevitably encountered in war. Accordingly, his analysis, perspective and thinking remain less distorted by emotion and more grounded in facts. Said another way, there's clarity to his observations that make them stand out, for me at least. Tonight that clarity illuminates a Bar otherwise dark and gloomy amid shadows of growing despair and cynicism.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of the guys/gals/whatever.
ReplyDeleteI quess you can take 'too soon' a lot of ways Rufus. I leave you to make the interpretation!
ReplyDeleteTrish noticed it, too.
ReplyDelete(Your Kurd-love, allen, is just damned strange.)
Yep, he's been a regular steady-eddy ever since he fell in love:)
Bob, the "I don't want to know" post was in reference to this:
ReplyDeletebut then I looked a little more closely, and began to worry--are those gals..or guys?
At least I didn't say 'pull out too soon' Rufus. Or withdraw, ahem. I may well have a more 'soiled' mind than yours. After all, I am a farmer.
ReplyDeleteBob, after a 90 day full court press, and a "successful" election campaign, I think the last thing in the world they expected to see was the Prez, on tv, announcing another 20 thousand troops for Baghdad, and Anbar.
ReplyDelete"Allen seems to be a Bar patron who maintains a steady balance in response to the events, positive and negative, inevitably encountered in war."
ReplyDeleteIt's not hard. Allen fervently believes that WE should "hold Iraq at all costs".
Allen is not a part of the WE. Allen is an I quite separate from.
I gotta remember that the next time I'm getting ready to get a good face-slapping:
ReplyDelete"Hey, it's not MY fault; I wuz raised on a Farm!"
"Allen seems to be a Bar patron who maintains a steady balance in response to the events, positive and negative, inevitably encountered in war."
ReplyDeleteObviously, the name Condi Rice, hasn't come up, tonight, eh?
I don't really know why I think this, and can't really bring up any evidence for it, and in fact the logic is probably against it, but I do think if we hang in there things may look considerably better in a while. I sure hope so, anyway.
ReplyDeleteI use that 'I'm just a farmer' routine all the time, Rufus. Funny thing is, it almost always works.
ReplyDeleteWell, Bob, it's hard to get mad at somebody so mentally "deficient" as to be a Farmer.
ReplyDeleteI'll admit, a couple of things have happened in the last couple of days that gives me a little hope.
ReplyDeleteI'm trying to be careful, though. There's a lot of politicians involved; and, they're "heartbreakers."
I don't mind, Rufus, as long as I get the 'deficiency' payments. I'm LOL and needing some sleep. Good nite, now. You keep that air conditioner in good repair, going to be a hot summer in the southland.
ReplyDeleteShit, it'll probably snow all summer. It's them rockets, and satellite, you know?
ReplyDeleteG'Nite. and, perchance to dream of deficiency payments, that is.
Doug got hit by a bug, and doesn't know Shiite, but maybe you haven't seen this yet?
ReplyDelete---
Maliki's officials were at pains to say that the prime minister would decide the issue of most concern to the Iraqi leader: whether, and when, Iraqi and American forces would be allowed to move in force into Sadr City.
That Shiite working-class district in northeast Baghdad is the stronghold of the Mahdi Army, the most powerful of the Shiite militias, and the main power base of Moktada al-Sadr, the Mahdi Army leader, whose parliamentary bloc sustains Mr. Maliki in office.
---
Samo Samo in Baghdad
"I use that 'I'm just a farmer' routine all the time, Rufus.
ReplyDeleteFunny thing is, it almost always works."
---
Something to do with the authenticity of the act.
Wu Woo said,
ReplyDeleteLastly, who here who supports the surge is willing to see Afghanistan abandoned? No? Wll then, just where did you think the troops would come from for the surge?
http://www.tulsaworld.com/NewsStory.asp?ID=070108_Ne_A4_UScom20184
As a last-ditch effort, President Bush is expected to announce this week the dispatch of thousands of additional troops to Iraq as a stopgap measure, an order that Pentagon officials say would strain the Army and Marine Corps as they struggle to man both wars.
Already, a U.S. Army infantry battalion fighting in a critical area of eastern Afghanistan is due to be withdrawn within weeks in order to deploy to Iraq.
"An actual UK government poster outside a London metro station. Shades of 1984."
ReplyDeleteannuit coeptis
He, he! Why is time GW's enemy? He has nothing but time. What happens in 2008? To change his world? Nothing except he gets to retire with a permanent escort and a good pension and lots of cash for speaking egagements.
ReplyDeleteWhat worries me is that so many Americans forget the premise of this war, it is going to take a long time. Remember? Most don't. Short attention span theater! Remember that old joke? Well, that describes us in the US today. We have NO memory. Mostly it is 30 minutes, then on to something else.
Here is the plan:
Close the borders - kill anyone who crosses without permission.
Disarm all of them, from the Tigris to the Euphrates, so to say.
OR
Close the borders - kill anyone who crosses without permission. Let the Kurds close their border off and let them control their portion of Iraq. They are the only ones behaving in a civilized manner.
Withdraw to the fringes of Bagdad and tell anyone who cares to listen that they have 6 months to sort it out, but no one comes in or out. Let the genocide commence and tell them we DO NOT CARE whether they live or die, but we care whether WE DO!
After 6 months take a look and see who is alive and in control. If we do not like them, kill them and put someone in who we do.
Sound too harsh? Then someone come up with something that works better than that.
That's what I thought.
Move on, nothing to see here.....
Friends forever
ReplyDeleteTill 1990 Kurds often said: "Our friends are only our mountains". This statement is familiar to both of your generals and the high-ranking officials as well. And they assured during the numerous meetings with the people of Southern Kurdistan: "Your friends are not only mountains, but we are your friends too".
Also has now come to prove time it in practice.