Revealed: Female economists are more left-wing than male as gender gap creeps into academia
PUBLISHED: 00:58 EST, 30 September 2012 | UPDATED: 00:58 EST, 30 September 2012
Female economists are significantly more left-wing than their male counterparts, who are more likely to hold free-market views.
Gap: Male and female economists tend to have very different political views
The extraordinary finding results from a survey of the political and professional beliefs of 400 economists, reported by USA Today.
On the whole, most economists are more likely to support free markets and low regulations than the general public.
But this tendency is much more pronounced among male economists, 59 per cent of whom believe the U.S. suffers from too much regulation - compared to just 35 per cent of women.
The political gap between men and women in the profession is apparent in nearly every area of policy.
On education, male economists are passionate supporters of introducing vouchers to enable parents to choose their children's schools.
61 per cent of them agree with the proposal, while just 14 per cent oppose it - but their female colleagues are overall against the plan.
By contrast, one policy proposal supported by women economists is forcing companies to pay for their employees' health insurance, a law which would be strongly opposed by men.
Perhaps the most controversial point of disagreement is over the pay gap between men and women.
The vast majority of male economists attribute any discrepancy to natural economic factors, whereas most female economists blames it on societal discrimination.
There are some areas where economists of both sexes agree - they all tend to be fans of Walmart, and foes of excessive military spending.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210710/Revealed-Female-economists-left-wing-male-gender-gap-creeps-academia.html#ixzz27wDt94da
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
While looking for further information on this post, I found a very interesting interview with Anne Pettifor by the Renegade Economist.ReplyDelete
Pettifor takes on the beast.
I would refer you to Elizabeth Warren, and Sheila Bair.ReplyDelete
Okay, that is an argument that has gone on forever, and will continue forevermore. What can we do, Today?ReplyDelete
I would posit that the immediate mitigation is to build an ethanol refinery in every county in the United States.
3,016 counties X 20 Million Gallons/Year per refinery gives us 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol per Year - enough fuel to replace All of the gasoline that's made with imported oil.
I think I'll refer to this from now on as "The Sixty Billion Gallons of Booze" initiative. (At least, until the Saudi Hit Squad shows up at my door.) :)
Maybe the founders had it right, not allowing woman to vote.ReplyDelete
You may interested in the following thread.ReplyDelete
I've schussed out the numbers as best I can, and I swear, I can't see any way that ethanol made from switchgrass, corn stover, etc. can't be profitable for all concerned at a price of $2.75/gal at the pump.ReplyDelete
And, I know damned well that my Chevy Impala would get 27.5 mpg, average, on E85 with a bit higher compression (a slightly taller piston, perhaps.)
That would put me back to $0.10/gal for a comfortable, mid-size sedan, with a relatively simple, and inexpensive engine.
We're sending $300 + Billion/Yr Overseas, and spending another $200 Billion/Yr protecting the supply chain when we could be recirculating that money in our own neighborhood - building schools, and hospitals, and factories, and housing. It's wasteful, and it's stupid; and it serves no one's interest except the Oilocrats, and the bankers.
There's not a chance in the world that this isn't where we're going; it's just a matter of how broke we allow ourselves to get before we get started.
This iѕ гeally interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!ReplyDelete
Also visit my web-site payday loans
Quality аrtiсles is the sеcret tο invite the viewers to go tο ѕeе the web site, that's what this site is providing.ReplyDelete
My blog post; no credit check loans
Ηi, i think that i saw you νisitеd mуReplyDelete
website so i came to “rеturn thе faѵoг”.
Ι'm attempting to find things to improve my web site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!
Take a look at my web page :: payday loans
ωhοah this blog is eхсellеnt i rеallу lіke stuԁying уour poѕts.ReplyDelete
Keеp up the good work! You reаlize,
lοts of іnԁiνidualѕ
are hunting aгounԁ for thiѕ infο, you сould аid thеm greatly.
Here iѕ my blog post :: payday loans
I think that evеrуthіng tуped was verуReplyDelete
reasonable. Βut, whаt about thіs? supρose you ωrote a catсhier
title? I ain't saying your content is not solid, however what if you added a headline that grabbed people'ѕ attention?
I mean "Male and female economists tend to have very different political views" is
а lіttle vаnillа. Υou ought
to look аt Yahοo's home page and note how they write news titles to get viewers interested. You might add a video or a pic or two to grab people interested about everything'ѵe got
to say. In my opіnіon, it woulԁ bring
your poѕts a little livelier.
My ωebpage :: payday loans
Great ωеblog right herе! Also your websiteReplyDelete
so much uр verу fast! What web host are you
using? Can I аm getting youг аssociate hypeгlink to youг host?
І desire mу web site loaԁed up aѕ quickly аs
Heгe is my webpage - Payday Loans