COLLECTIVE MADNESS


“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."

Monday, June 18, 2007

Why are We Ruled by Self -Loathing White Liberals like Lindsey Graham and George Bush?


Non-Self Loathing White American Men

The amnesty bill is back and true to form the self-loathing Republicans have to come up with this artifice: The new bill includes a proposal by Sens. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to establish a $4.4 billion fund, paid for by fees and fines collected from undocumented immigrants, exclusively for financing border security. The implication here is that Americans cannot even pony up the change to protect our own borders. We need some idiotic convoluted scheme put together by two spineless Republicans. They make me sick with disgust. It may be time for some revolution.

Illegal Immigration And The Fall Of Rome

By: Patrick Burke, For The Bulletin
06/18/2007

For centuries historians have debated the reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. The ancient authors pointed to invasions by barbarian armies. But why did the Romans succumb to the invaders when they had been able previously to resist them? Gibbon attributed it to internal weakness: the conversion to Christianity deprived the Romans of their fighting spirit. For many years now scholars have favored an economic explanation: high taxes and heavy economic regulation impoverished the empire. But a recent book by English historian Peter Heather argues that Rome was overcome by illegal immigration.

The Germanic tribes did not want to destroy the empire but only to participate in its wealth and the protection it offered its citizens. Though living outside the empire's borders (the Rhine and the Danube) for several hundred years, from roughly the first to the fifth century, they had been able to trade with Rome and had grown much wealthier in the process. But wealthier meant more powerful. When the Huns appeared behind them out of the Asian steppes, the Germans became determined to get into the safety of the empire by any means. The Romans, for their part, were not opposed to their desire. On the contrary, Rome from its beginnings was an inclusive society and had always welcomed immigrants. It routinely gave them employment in the Roman army. But immigrants were welcome only under certain conditions: They had to assimilate. They had to disperse throughout the empire's territory and not insist on remaining in their own groups or maintaining their own culture but adopt Roman ways of living. Above all, the Romans admitted immigrants only when they could control the process militarily. Any time a tribe of immigrants was permitted to enter, Rome made sure that the empire's armies outnumbered them by a wide margin so that there could be no question as to who was in charge. If the visitors got obstreperous, they would quickly find themselves quelled.

But in the fifth century the Romans lost control of the immigration process. Armies were sent to the Middle East to counter a hostile, newly invigorated Persia, leaving the West open. The Germanic tribes were allowed in, but once inside the empire they were not assimilated but retained their cultural and political identities, eventually combining to form armies within its borders that the Romans could no longer overcome.
Patrick Burke is director of the Wynnewood Institute.


©The Evening Bulletin 2007

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. go back to our roots of america

    look at the length of time jefferson fought to establish a navy to fight the islamic north african countries..

    the betsy comes to mind..

    sometimes americans (and proto ones too) take a while to warm up under the collar...

    ReplyDelete
  4. The implication here is that Americans cannot even pony up the change to protect our own borders.

    They ponied up for 700 miles of fence so they could say they were for border security, and built only two miles of it, so the corporations that depend on cheap labor never sweat a drop worrying. They can appropriate 4.4 billion dollars in the next bill and never spend a dime of it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The revolution does continue.
    The expansion of the inalienable "Rights of Man", throughout the Americas, coast to coast, north to south.

    Nothing but opportunity.

    Not limited by birth, creed or race
    Not limited by geography, time or space.
    Onward Christian soldiers!

    One land, One People
    Artic to Isthmus

    One brick at a time, until the world is illuminated.

    ReplyDelete