COLLECTIVE MADNESS
“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."
"Celebrate Diversity"
ReplyDelete"Teach Tolerance"
"Buck Fush"
Goddamn! What a beautiful girl. Hang 'em.
ReplyDeleteDiversity is Our Strength!
ReplyDeleteOn to Dhimmitude!
Grassfire.org Alliance
ReplyDeleteBush-Kennedy Amnesty Bill Update
To: Habu
Habu,
Bush and the Amnesty Senators are now preparing to bring
the Bush-Kennedy Amnesty bill back for a vote immediately.
Yesterday, Commerce Secretary Gutierrez said the administration
is "more determined than ever" to pass amnesty and Tony Snow
added that the Senate "could wrap this up in two days." Now,
Bush has scheduled a meeting with Senate Republicans on
Tuesday to plan strategy and Majority Leader Reid is saying
he is ready to move the bill to a vote.
Habu, I am outraged and you should be as well.
Just last week, the American people soundly rejected Bush-Kennedy
Amnesty. The New York Times even featured Grassfire.org and
three of our team members in a Page One lead story yesterday
entitled "Grass Roots Roared". Now, they are bringing amnesty back!
See the NYTimes article linked here:
http://www.grassfire.org/19042/offer.asp?rid=13413755
Two crucial action items:
Action Item #1-- Call Your Senators and the White House
and tell them to "Back Off"!
Sen. Martinez 202) 224-3041
Sen. Nelson (202) 224-5274
White House Switchboard: 202-456-1414
White House Comment Line: 202-456-1111
Talking Points:
1. I am outraged that the President and the Senate are
again planning on pushing this amnesty bill.
2. I am offended that these leaders are ignoring the
clear voice of grassroots Americans.
3. I call on you to announce publicly your opposition to
the Bush-Kennedy amnesty bill and call on the Senate
to abandon plans for further debate.
Action #2 -- Fax the President and Senate NOW!
I know you have done so much already, but we cannot stop now.
We have added key Bush Administration targets to our Fax Hot
List, in addition to key Senators who must be reached today
with a flood of faxes.
Go here to send your faxes:
http://www.grassfire.org/19042/offer.asp?rid=13413755
Our staff and contacts on the Hill sensed all along that the
Amnesty Gang would bring this bill back.
Now, they have made their intentions perfectly clear.
The New York Times said that the "Grass Roots Roared" in
opposition to Bush-Kennedy Amnesty. Well, now we must
roar even louder!
Thanks for your immediate action!
Steve Elliott, President
Grassfire.org
P.S. I included links on my FireSociety blog to the news article
where the Commerce Secretary and Tony Snow made their comments.
Go here to read those articles and give me your comments.
http://www.firesociety.com/blog/100/14417/?src=111
+ + Feedback or comments on this update?
Go to FireSociety.com and post your comments so that the
Grassfire staff along with thousands of citizens can
benefit from your thoughts and opinions:
http://www.firesociety.com/comments/14418/Discussion/?src=111
"There is no excuse for the silence from woman's groups on this continuing outrage."
ReplyDeleteWhoa there, buddy. What's the excuse for the silence of Muslim women? Do we no longer expect people to take up their own damn cause, if cause enough it be?
Trish, your point is well taken, however strong spines are not the human norm. Muslim woman have been captive a very long time. The first thing the West should do is ban the wearing of burqas in courts, schools and public buildings. Western woman need to take up the cause. The two examples shown on this post are far too common in the daily experience of Islamic woman.
ReplyDeleteTne mussulwomen are not abused, trish, they are treated fairly, as is allah's will.
ReplyDeleteThere is no cause for complaint.
There is only conservation of the way things are. No progressives desired or needed to intercede.
Matter of perspective as to the role of family and fathers in the family. Their way has worked, for them, for 1400 years. The "western" way is "no good", Paris, Britney and Lyndsay Lohan are all the proof of societal failure the mussulwomen need point to.
Sometimes people cannot protect themselves, Stockholmed by their society and culture, hijacked by life, held hostage by realities.
Slavery should only be battled by escaped slaves, or the freemen should wait, for a slave revolt prior to taking action against the evil that men do?
As to this sycles "Ross Perot"
ReplyDeleteMike Bloomberg could buy the White House
But does America crave a sane version of Ross Perot with actual governing experience?
By Walter Shapiro
Someone could win the White House with a minority, again.
No "Plan" involved, either?
All "Plans" are not publicly known, are they? Conspiracies are only theories, concocted by those that were conspired against?
It isn't desert rat, no he just exemplifies the rant of the new era in American life, the Age of Cynicims, as Rich Lowry takes the time to clarify:
ReplyDeleteIt might be the fate of President Bush to be remembered as the emblem of an Age of Cynicism, when -- despite many encouraging economic and social indicators -- we experienced a deep public funk, driven by the feeling that government couldn't be trusted to do anything, at least not well.
This is the spirit that more than anything else brought down (for now) the Senate's Grand Compromise on immigration. It wasn't Bush's declining clout or raging xenophobia so much as the collective grass-roots reply to the White House's detailed explications of the enforcement provisions in the bill: "We simply don't believe you."
His administration had made no appreciable attempt to enforce immigration laws until recently. A government can't ignore its own laws without creating deep suspicions about its motives. Then, there was the question of capability. At the same time the administration was maintaining it could process at least 12 million illegal immigrants into a complex path to citizenship, it couldn't even manage to issue passports in a timely manner when new regulations passed in 2004 came into effect.
The administration is paying a price for its serial abuse of the word "must." Bush often has said that a given country "must" relinquish its nuclear program or free a dissident or forswear test-firing a missile, with little in the way of consequence when his demand is ignored. So when his administration says, under the immigration deal, an immigrant or an employer "must" do something, no one believes that verb represents anything more than wishfulness.
The backdrop to all this, of course, is the Iraq War. The government of the United States presented to the world intelligence that turned out to be wrong; insisted we were making steady progress in the guerrilla war when, by the end of 2006, we were facing catastrophe; and has still managed only fitful progress against an enemy whose main weapon is home-made bombs. This casts a pall over our public life, augmented by Hurricane Katrina's devastation, corruption in Congress, paranoiac ranting on the left and incompetence in high places (see Attorney General Alberto Gonzales).
I responsible for my own soul, Mr Bush should look to his own not force the privations of pentance upon me for his and his Government's sins.
I have already done the Hard Thing.
ReplyDeleteMr Bush should try it sometime.
Privations of penance are good for the soul, that is why I reccomend it for Mr Bush.
2164th wrote:
ReplyDelete"The first thing the West should do is ban the wearing of burqas in courts, schools and public buildings."
Odd way of promoting women's rights - telling the what they can and cannot wear.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt is kind of a residual neo-con idealism, ash.
ReplyDeleteIf we force exposure to non-mussulmen activities and cultural mores upon the mussulfolk, they will see the error of their ways, abandoning them for the enlightened status of of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears.
Enforce a Societal Dress Code.
No "Colors" allowed.
Everything in black and white.
Though there are those that say Porn is the Way Forward, as a tactical method to be employeed in the War on Islam.
Undermine their culture with ours.
Shake! Shake! Shake!
Shake your booty,
Shake your booty!
Show your tits,
for freedoms sake
I believe there was a video possted, not long ago, of a lady beating on a Dress Code enforcer, in Iran.
ReplyDeleteLady in western garb, she was whippin' on the burka babe,
Broad daylight.
We cheered, metaphoricly.
Now we'd emulate the burka babes techniques, but in a better cause?
2164th: The first thing the West should do is ban the wearing of burqas in courts, schools and public buildings.
ReplyDeleteFirst the came for the burquas, but I didn't say anything because I didn't wear a burqua. Next they came for the Sacred Mormon Underwear...
"Slavery should only be battled by escaped slaves, or the freemen should wait, for a slave revolt prior to taking action against the evil that men do?"
ReplyDeleteExcept that this is not a matter of law, Rat. It is not a matter of legal right or recognition withheld by the government, but of a particular social culture perpetuated and tolerated by private citizens who belong to it. When the victims among them, recognizing themselves as such, begin to challenge, then abandon, as is their right, that set of customs as unwanted and abhorrent, change will slowly materialize.
Muslim women must take up the matter of their own lot. They are not children, and are most desperately in need of their own intercession as adults, first and foremost. Such is the responsibility of freedom.
Nice one, T.
ReplyDeleteThese woman have been reduced to dogs. But dogs too have certain legal rights. Any ideas how those legal rights came to be, Trish?
ReplyDeleteWatching the constant decline of Islamic power since 1699 and it’s ever accelerating rapid decent spiraling downward faster and faster since 1979. It is clear that if Allah exists, he has abandoned the cause of the extremist Islamic militants in favor of civilizations that promote equality, freedom and human rights. Many theologians believe this is punishment for the events of 661 when Muslims turned against themselves and began their traitorous decent into impudent destructive killing, abandoning the compassionate teachings of the Prophet Jesus in favor of killing their perceived enemies and their own brothers and sisters.
ReplyDelete