COLLECTIVE MADNESS


“Soft despotism is a term coined by Alexis de Tocqueville describing the state into which a country overrun by "a network of small complicated rules" might degrade. Soft despotism is different from despotism (also called 'hard despotism') in the sense that it is not obvious to the people."
Showing posts with label Bank meltdown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank meltdown. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Too Little Too Late?

I watched much of the testimony and presentation of Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary. It was an underwhelming tentative and vague attempt and frankly I'm not sure what I heard.

Last night, President Obama gave a good demonstration of his intellect and skill as a speaker and a thinker. Unfortunately, I do not think that he is tough enough by half. That shows by the fact that the Republican pols in Congress do not fear Obama. They should. Obama should be raising hell, kicking ass and taking no prisoners. That is not in his DNA. He has surrounded himself with Democratic retreads and a sprinkling of Republican re-runs.

The Obama team is not going to cut it, just like the inept Bush Administration before him, at least as presently constituted.

As usual the wrong people seem to be in government. The questions and comments from the Barney Frank Committee were at best, an embarrassment, and these are the people that are making the laws that are to save us.

Well, the OJT program will continue. I have a question. Who would you trust and recommend to sort out this mess?




Monday, September 15, 2008

It Comes Down to This. Who Do You Trust With The Economy?

"Geez, do you think it will spread?"

Bernanke was correct when he suggested that the banks should be permitted and encouraged to sit down with problem borrowers and re-negotiate existing loans and mortgages. The reluctance to do so was the equivalent of allowing houses to burn down because the owners did not pay their local taxes. Well guess what. How did that work out?
__________________________

Bank meltdown wallops campaigns

Politico

By MIKE ALLEN | 9/14/08 9:56 PM EST


America’s banking instability could upend the final 50 days of the presidential campaign, with both candidates forced to confront a calamity that has gotten only glancing attention during the first 20 months of the race for the White House.

Red flags about the nation’s economic infrastructure have been popping up at least since the collapse in March of the investment bank Bear Stearns. But neither Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) nor Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has talked in detail about the potential consequences for voters and the government.

Until now, the crisis seemed like a confusing Wall Street story. That all ended with the fast-moving events of Sunday, which The New York Times called “one of the most extraordinary days in Wall Street’s history.” A CNBC special report on Sunday night called it “a complete realignment of Wall Street.”

And that was before the extraordinary 9:30 p.m. announcement by the Federal Reserve of new efforts to shore up markets.

So it’s no longer an insider's game. The crisis is now at a tipping point where Wall Street will visibly affect Main Street: Home buyers, consumers and entrepreneurs will have even more trouble getting credit, slowing the nation’s job machinery.

Here are four huge effects for the campaigns:

1. The candidates had hoped to put off their detailed prescriptions until they were in office, unrolling an economic agenda in conjunction with an address to the new Congress. Now, there's no way to duck it.

But at a time when the economy is the top issue on voters’ minds, one of the candidates could wind up winning the neck-and-neck election by talking clearly and convincingly about the fallout and what should be done.

"This is the financial equivalent of Russia invading Georgia — an unexpected event that calls for leadership and direction,” said James Rickards, senior managing director for market intelligence at Omnis Inc., a research and analysis firm based in McLean, Va.

“This is an opportunity for both candidates to go beyond their [comments on] administration action and show how they would stabilize the system on a more lasting basis.”

2. The new crisis crowds the candidates’ agendas in the stretch run, keeping them from talking about the issues that they had planned to focus on. But the candidates are creatively trying to meld the disaster into their existing messages.

McCain aides say he plans to use the news to underscore the reform message that he began hammering at the Republican National Convention.

“This is bad news for the country and yet another sign that we need to reform Wall Street,” a senior McCain official said. “The only way we can do that is by reforming Washington first. We will show McCain and Palin as the ticket who will take action on the economy and make sure the taxpayers aren't stuck with the bill.”

Obama aides say he will hammer the message that the market upheaval shows that the country can’t afford four more years of policies aligned with those of the current administration.

His running mate, Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), was already scheduled to give a major speech Monday in St. Clair Shores, Mich., and is likely to get heavy coverage for his fiery elaboration on this theme.

3. Just like the markets, however, each candidate faces an enormous downside risk: Troubled times could make voters less likely to take a chance on Obama, with his shorter time in Washington. McCain could pay the price for the economic disruption on a Republican's watch, or if he looks like he doesn’t have the energy and creativity to reassure a worried nation.

4. They will also be more constrained when they get to Washington, with analysts estimating that the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is likely to cost the Treasury $100 billion to $300 billion.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson “spent the cookie jar” with the takeover, a McCain adviser said.