Be it good news or bad, change is always guaranteed. The BBC, wishing to be "helpful", reminds us how things were meant to be and how they have fallen short. All that is interesting, but mostly not useful. The present Administration and Republican leadership was not getting business done. They thought that they were on top and would stay that way. Like many before them and many more to come, the got their "come-uppance".It is the most basic of life lessons, but people always seem surprised when it happens to them. The Democrats who have had plenty to say have now been handed the hammer. We shall soon see how good they are at driving the nail.
The American Century -BBC
"During his first term President Bush bestrode the world like a colossus.
He drew inspiration from the principles of the Project for the New American Century, drawn up in 1997. Among the signatories were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
It asked: "Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests?"
The 9/11 attacks and the "war on terror" he declared in a speech soon afterwards allowed him to use the instruments of US power and diplomacy to topple the Taleban and gather support from around the world.
Then there was the "Forward Strategy of Freedom" announced in November 2003, for democracy in the Middle East. "Promoting democracy and freedom in the Middle East will be a massive and difficult undertaking, but it is worthy of America's effort and sacrifice, " he said.
Iraq and the disastrous course of events between Israel and its neighbours have lowered expectations for all that.
And now the mid-term elections, which the Republicans thought earlier this year they had in the bag have confirmed that criticism from fellow Americans has caught up with criticism from around the world."
Comment: There is going to be a lot of comments like these. I pose a question to you. How would you advise GWB to finish his term? What advice would you have for the Democrats and Republicans?
Resign and let Cheney take over for two years.
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell does THAT mean?
ReplyDeleteIf you want to see some folks with worse BDS than the apologists at Belmont, check out this thread.
ReplyDelete---
(Notice new, true usage of BDS)
A very good question and I've given it some thought:
ReplyDeleteBush should lawyer up big time and be prepared to fight the investigations hard. contest everything, use every trick in the book and take every opportunity to point out that the Democrats are doing this instead of dealing with the business at hand.
The Republican leadership must lick its wounds and do some serious soul searching. they were sent a message. Blaming the media or dirty tricks won't work now. Time to overcome denial and face a hard fact: if you proclaim your standards, you will be judged by them. Its time for them to get back on message and find a vision that isn't a bridge to nowhere.
The Democrats must now take some positions. the looming war in lebannon and Palestine will force a crisis on them very soon. since UNIFIL's expanded mission will have failed, the Democrats cherished notion of "international co operation" will not avail them.
As for the BBC, I've reached the conclusion that it's an enclave of angry homosexuals who despise us yank rubes for resisting the inevitable acceptance of the anything goes life style.
I still don't understand them, though. A failed America is tantamount to them cutting thier noses off to spite their faces. It seems to me that these guys, given the choice between grudging acceptance and a good old fashioned stoning at dawn, would rather the Muslims killed them.
Go figger.
Doug,
ReplyDeleteThere's not a whole helluva lot that Bush hasn't already done that the Dems would want to do.
Bush is in the process of lowering Americas Armed Forces. He's spent more on social programs than any president in history.
He's allowed open borders and flirted with amnesty.
He's working night and day on merging Canada the US and mexico into a grand North American New World.
What's left for the Dems to do?
Habu,
ReplyDeleteYes, he has moved the Agenda forward well indeed.
Global Socialism.
...and dhimitude, of course.
ReplyDeleteright, doug, if we can't have perfection, let's have disaster.
ReplyDeleteWhat habu outlines IS a disaster.
ReplyDeleteEngineered by Bush.
No, I meant it. Disaster will come, and then we may get serious. As I offered over at BC just now, my sincere congradulations, and good luck, to everyone who wanted big policy changes. Now you'll get 'em.
ReplyDeleteBetter to have no loaf than a half-loaf, because now we will have to re-learn how to bake.
ReplyDeleteThis'll put Chavez back in--wonder when Publius will post on that?
ReplyDeleteTime for a reversal of the "we'll stand down as they stand up" strategy. No timetables, but Bush can start bringing home two troops for every one that goes in. It's sink or swim time for the Iraqi Army. Americans just gave the Adminstration the message that they don't wanna be babysitters forever. Hopefully Rumsfeld was not the only one to receive it.
ReplyDeleteDon't worry, Teresita--the war is over. The guys now should stay low and try not to be the last KIA, while we disengage.
ReplyDeleteResign and let Cheney take over for two years
ReplyDeleteYou're right, Doug. Let's call a spade a spade.
Maybe you right, rufus.
ReplyDeleteI think Rufus has more than a few great observations but the one that kinda "thunderstruck" me was his very keen insight into...why fix the problem now when it can be a campaign issue you can run on in '08.
ReplyDeleteNow I admit I use to be a guy everyone came to for the skinny. I even hosted (guest) a radio talk show at a station that had 100k watts of power and carried Rush...but Rufus' point is so pure, so political I'm (vanity here) surprised "thunderstruck "me.
Don't be thunderstruck'in me too much my heart can't take no more.
Semper Fi
The thing that's changed on that, habu, is before yesterday, they had to badger from the outside, to avoid resolutions. Now they can control from the inside, for two more years, and will have even more to win the 08 with. So long as a Pub is in the WH, it'll be the same, but but much, much more. Solution: no more Pubs. Ever.
ReplyDeleteOf course we still have the Iranian situation to deal with..my new timetable is now 'sometime in the future". Both the month and day will contain vowels, and the exact time will involve numbers.
ReplyDeleteBuddy,
ReplyDeleteGood point, in fact with their proclivity toward having "hearings" and the MSM ruch to cover them live will give them lots of face time and of course they'll beat the shit out of the Republicans that are in the spotlight.
The comity will last until, well it's already over. I'm surprised Rangel hasn't called for the VP to shoot himself.
Hey maybe Cheney could take Rangel on a hunt..hmmm
Buddy,
ReplyDeleteWhen the Dems got away with lynching Ollie North on TV that's when I said, Ok, I'm finished following this shit like a fine piece of tail.
Reagan was great, but that was the zenith.
I just keep wait'n for the revolution. The shoot'in kind.
Well, you saw the train a-coming, I guess. I've been thinking we were still laying tracks, but I guess not.
ReplyDeleteEmanuel engineered the victory, not Harry and Nancy.
ReplyDelete...Hillary is too smart to not follow his advice:
Probably be more of the same, ie, nothing really outrageous, feign sanity for two years, get elected.
...course maybe she could just honorably protest as the moonbats rip the country apart.
"New Defense Sec. co-chaired a task force that called for dialogue with Iran... "
ReplyDelete---
Ledeen Commits Suicide.
So the two most powerful women in America both have extreme face jobs to try to look younger.
ReplyDelete(More immature)
Just what the country needs.
America can just pretend until we can't.
Halliburton, the CIA and big tobacco companies are among the early targets identified by top Democratic staff to ABC News as likely targets for investigation once the Democrats take control of the House at the beginning of next year.
ReplyDelete---
Right, investigate the CIA to make sure Clinton's Traitors don't get blamed.
War or Retreat.
ReplyDeleteThe future course has been decided by Mr Baker, Mr Hamilton and Mr Gates. Ratified by Mr Bush's choice for SecDef.
Negotiate Iraqi stability with Iran and Syria.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a President with two years left who has had his Policy repudiated at the polls. Not Gallup or Rasmussen polls, either.
War or Retreat, a new navigator's been hired and the course has been charted.
Doug,
ReplyDeleteThey dig too deep and "Red Ted" is gonna get fried for treason. He's gonna have to defend the charges in this new book that he cahooted with Andropov ... I would hope he'd sue the guy but he won't cause he doesn't want any more exposure.
Another topic..if we go full tilt socialist can we do it like Amsterdam, except without the muzzies?
Treason is no longer recognized as a Crime, Habu.
ReplyDeleteHell, you become known as a "Truthteller."
And a "Patriotic" Hero to millions.
great, NOW, we get Amsterdam, now that the girls are all my daughter's age.
ReplyDeleteHey, we had the Sixties, Larsen:
ReplyDeleteDon't rewrite history so you can whine about it.
DR,
ReplyDeleteYou're sure don't have to dig too deep to find out Gates' take on negotiating with Iran. He's on record. And he must have known as DCI that Iran was developing nuke power.
Baker's in that mix, so it looks like "Atoms for Peace" even though crazy Amanjandanrxxx has vowed to rub out Israel.
It's Israel Gates and Baker will have to sell...and in a hurray, or given the "spirit" of our foreign policy they could just write off Israel and let "Atoms for Peace" run it's course. Is it ally or all-lies ...hooked on phonics
Buddy,
ReplyDeleteThat is the shits, and do they sell Viagra there?
I don't know, I've never used the stuff. That disclaimer about "seeing your doctor if the *** lasts more than four days" put me in mind of Robert Duvall in "Lonesome Dove", when he was dying rather than having his leg sawed off, and explained "some things are just too hard on a man's vanity".
ReplyDeleteI mean, what do you at the doc's office, climb in thru a back window? Or sit in the waiting room wearing two hats (if you get my drift)?
Why are Hewitt and Kyl talking about the next REPUBLICAN leader in the Senate?
ReplyDelete(McConell or Alexander)
Tester leads Burns by about 2,800 votes -- less than 1 percentage point -- with 100 percent of precincts reporting.
ReplyDelete---
You should have taken a few planeloads up there to vote, Habu!
Buddy,
ReplyDeleteI'm glad. Now I won't have to worry anymore about you not having a good time.
Buy the way any of you guys seen "Flags of Our Fathers?"
How many stars?
Hewitt points out that Bush campaigned on up or down votes for everyone in 2002.
ReplyDelete(Red Meat for Conservatives)
But John McCain never makes mistakes, so who to blame?
I need to verify this , but it looks to me that fellowpeacekeeper with
ReplyDeleteDems picking up 25 in the house and 7 in the senate may be the winner. Can anyone prove they posted a better?
Maybe he'll donate it to the EB Mourning After Memorial "Celebration."
ReplyDeleteHewitt unleashed:
ReplyDeleteRagging on the House GOP for not asking the people about who should be the next leader.
Doug,
ReplyDeleteI wish I had taken a million man march to Montana..too damn late now.
It's really kinda too bad for that state cause the only thing politically they have going for then is/was senority in the Senate.
They only have One (1) U.S. Representative.
Max baucus is getting frail and this new guy is just another Montana farmer. He'll end up cleaning the stables and Montana will continue to get bupkis in the way of power.
But then that's ok ..people stay away from Montana it's a horrid place. Indians, single wides, not indoor water terrible terrible.
Typical ME telephone call today...
ReplyDelete" Hey Vlad, this Hosni, wuzz up dude? Listen I know Sadat threw you guys out years ago but he was a freak-a zoid, and the Brotherhood did him anyway. Listen, lets get together at you dacha on the Black Sea and hash out the purchase of some of your planes,tanks,Ak's, you know , like our mutual friend Hugo did. Of course we'll need advisers and more advisers. Ok ,good, see you next month.
:-)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great review, Catherine.
I heard Montana was really nice, reasonable real-estate, great water and views, a real gem.
ReplyDeleteHere, ht Taranto, is a sentence:
"Michigan voted to ban affirmative action, 58 percent to 42 percent, with the majority of votes coming from white male conservatives, based on exit polls. Both men and women of color strongly opposed the so-called Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), but lacking representation in the electorate diluted the power of their votes."
Lacking representation in the electorate--hell, that's bad, it can lead to "lacking votes".
Catherine,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the response. I remember your first impression was that it was a movie that would make furniture cry. I thought that was very descriptive.
I will see it tomorrow or Friday.
Buddy,
ReplyDeleteYeah you're thinking about the nice end of Montana, around Miles City. Beautiful rolling hills, nice folks..that's where ya wanna be ....eastern Montana ..
Western Montana harbors the Militia of Montana and was home of the Unibomber. Then a couple of years ago they had a guy making pies and stews out of little boys in Great Falls, true.
Western Montana = BAD
Eastern Montana = GOOD
Montana was not always so ill regarded.
ReplyDeleteMike Mansfield (D-MT)
Senate Majority Leader
1961-1977
Frank Zappa was at one time contemplating moving there to raise dental floss.
ReplyDeleteIneedamantra, ineedamantra, ineedamantra, ineedamantra.....
ReplyDeleteI might be moving to Montana soon
ReplyDelete