2013 Obfuscation and Lies
2011 Obfuscation and Lies
Stealing Agent Mathew Lowry
1988 Obfuscation, Cheating and Lies
1960s Character Assassination , Spying
Buchanan: Did the FBI conspire to stop Trump?
The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did Donald Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir Putin’s Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Trump?
A year and a half into the investigation, and, still, no “collusion” has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the never-Trump media and Beltway establishment.
Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen. Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump?
Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here: That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary. Having failed, they conspired to break Trump’s presidency, overturn his mandate and bring him down.
Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private email server. That first objective was achieved 18 months ago.
On July 5, 2016, Comey stepped before a stunned press corps to declare that, given the evidence gathered by the FBI, “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict Clinton. Therefore, that was the course he, Comey, was recommending.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, compromised by her infamous 35-minute tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton -- to discuss golf and grandkids -- seconded Comey’s decision.
And so Hillary walked. Why is this suspicious?
First, whether or not to indict was a decision that belonged to the Department of Justice, not Comey or the FBI. His preemption of Justice Department authority was astonishing.
Second, while Comey said in his statement that Hillary had been “extremely careless” with security secrets, in his first draft, Clinton was declared guilty of “gross negligence” -- the precise language in the statute to justify indictment.
Who talked Comey into softening the language to look less than criminal? One man was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, Jill, a Virginia state Senate candidate, received a munificent PAC contribution of $474,000 from Clinton family friend and big bundler Terry McAuliffe.
Also urging Comey to soften the fatal phrase “gross negligence” was key FBI agent Peter Strzok. In text messages to his FBI lover Lisa Page, Strzok repeatedly vented his detestation of the “idiot” Trump.
After one meeting with “Andy” (McCabe), Strzok told Page an “insurance policy” was needed to keep Trump out of the White House.
Also, it appears Comey began drafting his exoneration statement of Hillary before the FBI had even interviewed her. And when the FBI did, Hillary was permitted to have her lawyers present.
One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in, and a pass for Hillary wired from the get-go. Comey, McCabe, Strzok were not going to recommend an indictment that would blow Hillary out of the water and let the Trump Tower crowd waltz into the White House.
Yet, if Special Counsel Robert Mueller cannot find any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to tilt the outcome of the 2016 election, his investigators might have another look at the Clinton campaign.
For there a Russian connection has been established.
Kremlin agents fabricated, faked, forged, or found the dirt on Trump that was passed to ex-British MI6 spy Christopher Steele, and wound up in his “dirty dossier” that was distributed to the mainstream media and the FBI to torpedo Trump.
And who hired Steele to tie Trump to Russia?
Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit into which the DNC and Clinton campaign pumped millions through law firm Perkins Coie.
The “dirty dossier,” a mixture of fabrications, falsehoods and half-truths, created to destroy Trump and make Hillary president, was the product of a British spy’s collusion with Kremlin agents.
In Dec. 26′s Washington Times, Rowan Scarborough writes that the FBI relied on this Kremlin-Steele dossier of allegations and lies to base their decision “to open a counterintelligence investigation (of Trump).” And press reports “cite the document’s disinformation in requests for court-approved wiretaps.”
If this is true, a critical questions arises: Has the Mueller probe been so contaminated by anti-Trump bias and reliance on Kremlin fabrications that any indictment it brings will be suspect in the eyes of the American people?
Director Comey has been fired. FBI No. 2 McCabe is now being retired under a cloud. Mueller’s top FBI investigator, Peter Strzok, and lover Lisa, have been discharged. And Mueller is left to rely upon a passel of prosecutors whose common denominator appears to be that they loathe Trump and made contributions to Hillary.
Attorney General Bobby Kennedy had his “Get Hoffa Squad” to take down Teamsters boss Jimmy Hoffa. J. Edgar Hoover had his vendetta against Dr. Martin Luther King.
Is history repeating itself -- with the designated target of an elite FBI cabal being the president of the United States?
Pat Buchanan (contact: LindaMuller@Buchanan.org) is an author and former presidential adviser and candidate. He writes for Creators Syndicate.
How many more scandals that we do not as yet know about?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHow many convictions will have to be vacated?
No testimony from a FBI agent or their forensic lab can be trusted ... Not if the top echelons of the organization is corrupt.
It's not like the corruption and lies that permeated the Trump Campaign.
From the National Security Advisor - Lt Gen Flynn, to the Campaign Manager Paul Manafort.
The high level meetings between Russians and Don Jr, Jared Kushner and the fore mentioned Paul Manafort at Trump Tower and then not informing the FBI when queried about Russian attempts to compromise the Trump Campaign.
Mr Trump's continued denials about contact between Russians and his Campaign orgaizatuon, in the face of his own son's e-mail chain.
So many lies ... So lottle trust
No one has been jailed because of Mr Trump's lies ...
DeleteCan the same be said of the FBI?
.
DeleteEvery other word that comes out of Trump's mouth is a lie and the Trumies response...'oh, that rascal'.
.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete.
DeleteCan we just stop saying the FBI is respected, but...? It isn't.
:o)
Many here don't respect the FBI. I personally don't like the stuff they pull or the anti-constitutional rights proposals and policies many of the leaders push; however, that said, I think you overstate your case.
I wasn't able to find any recent polls but I suspect that the FBI's current approval rating among the general public is at least twice that of their ultimate boss, the guy sitting in the oval office.
.
Mueller, FBI face crisis in public confidence
DeleteSixty-three percent of polled voters believe that the FBI has been resisting providing information to Congress on the Clinton and Trump investigations. This is a remarkable finding for an agency whose new head said a few days ago that the agency was in fine shape. No, it isn’t.
Fifty-four percent say special counsel Robert Mueller has conflicts of interest that prevent him from doing an unbiased job, also according to this month’s Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll. So, given this finding, the silence from the special counsel on the subject has become downright deafening.
These are significant findings about an operation that was supposed to bring more objectivity and less partisanship to the Trump-Russia investigation. Clearly these numbers indicate that there is a crisis in public confidence in both the FBI and Mueller. What makes these findings important is that, with Trump’s approval rating at 41 percent, these results include large numbers of voters who don’t like Trump yet who now agree that these investigations have veered off course.
After this poll was conducted, we learned that rogue agent Peter Strzok and his paramour, Lisa Page, both high-ranking members of the Mueller task force, discussed during the campaign how, in case Trump won, that they were developing, along with deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, what Strzok called an “insurance policy.” I can’t even imagine how badly these new facts will poll next month.
Our polling in November showed that 61 percent say the funding of the salacious GPS Fusion document should be investigated. Fifty-eight percent say that if Hillary Clinton and the Democrats funded the work, it could not be used by law enforcement. While this seems obvious to the public, Congress has not been able to get the answer to the question of just how this dossier was used and whether the FBI then paid some of the cost to legitimize it. Even greater numbers — 65 percent — said there needs to be an investigation of the Uranium One deal that netted the Clinton Foundation $140 million in foreign-based contributions that went undisclosed.
One plus for the Mueller investigation is that the public did overwhelmingly endorse the prosecution of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and most think he should get jail time, believing, rightly or wrongly, that his talking to the Russians even during the transition was likely illegal. But that does not change the overall public assessment that the Mueller investigation is blown and that the FBI is stonewalling. Even back in the days of the Monica Lewinsky investigation, which I worked on with President Clinton, the special counsel was not seen as having a conflict of interest.
DeleteNew facts related to the issue of bias seem to be emerging every day. More important, though, a counter theory has emerged in which the dossier was peddled to the FBI rather systematically, including by hiring the wife of an FBI official, and then, despite its obvious bias and false content, used to start the Russia investigation by agents who were tinged with animus. The theory goes that they signed the wiretaps that were then unmasked by various Obama administration officials, who then were able to snoop on the transition.
Former FBI Director James Comey, in showing the document to President Trump, didn’t tell him that it was funded by the Democrats because it was all an attempt to entrap him anyway — the insurance policy. A few months ago this certainly seemed far-fetched but today, with each new fact and with the failure of the officials to respond meaningfully to Congress, there is certainly more evidence behind these theories. To top it off, most Americans now also see that the treatment being given to Trump aides is far harsher than occurred with Clinton’s aides, despite their being caught in obvious lies, claiming they did not even know about the email server.
Someone now is going to have to stand up and have the courage to clean all this up, get to the full facts and reset the whole investigation to look at everything here, from the original Clinton investigation on through the transition. The president’s hands are tied, but the attorney general could step in or resign. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray could wake up to the reality and act. Maybe there is an inspector general who could be empowered. When you look at the polling numbers and the stream of revelations, the current course is simply untenable and likely to go from a crisis in confidence to a full-blown constitutional crisis if not corrected.
http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/364873-mueller-fbi-face-crisis-in-public-confidence
.
DeleteYou offer up numbers from one poll regarding public opinions on aspects of the Mueller investigation and the amount of info the FBI is providing to Congress and on the need for a further investigation of the Uranium one deal. You offer zip on the public's general opinion of the FBI something Deuce was talking about and I responded to.
The rest of this is merely the opinions of the author on what 'should' happen in his ideal world.
Also, he is wrong on this...Maybe there is an inspector general who could be empowered.
There has been an IG who is investigating many of these charges. The DOJ IG has an ongoing investigation that has been going one since January. Old Bob, tells us the American Thinker says the IG is doing a great job. Someone else, I thought it was you, put up a link on it not that long ago.
As for Uranium One, if Trump or Sessions wants an investigation into that all they have to do is start it. I'm all for it though I suspect it will be a waste of time.
.
.
.
DeleteJanuary 12, 2017
DOJ OIG Announces Initiation of Review
Department of Justice Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz announced today that, in response
to requests from numerous Chairmen and Ranking Members of Congressional oversight committees,
various organizations, and members of the public, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a
review of allegations regarding certain actions by the Department of Justice (Department) and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in advance of the 2016 election. Cognizant of the scope of the
OIG’s jurisdiction under Section 8E of the Inspector General Act, the review will examine the following
issues:
• Allegations that Department or FBI policies or procedures were not followed in connection
with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Director’s public announcement on
July 5, 2016, and the Director’s letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016,
and that certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations;
• Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in
certain investigative matters;
• Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs
improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have
been recused from participating in certain matters;
• Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information; and
• Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a
Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations.
The review will not substitute the OIG’s judgment for the judgments made by the FBI or the
Department regarding the substantive merits of investigative or prosecutive decisions. Finally, if
circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of
the review.
This investigation has been going on for months longer than the Mueller investigation. Surprisingly, the usual suspects have failed to demand that it be brought to a speeding close.
Political? Double standard? Naw, couldn't be.
.
Yup, Harvard Poll shows the public is just thrilled with Mueller, Comey, and their FBI.
DeleteNot.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1CAACAO_enUS720US720&ei=xn9JWoyZFYfm0gLRqpewDw&q=Harvard+CAPS-Harris+Poll+mueller&oq=Harvard+CAPS-Harris+Poll+mueller&gs_l=psy-ab.3...105434.108185.0.108786.8.8.0.0.0.0.181.840.0j5.5.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..3.4.658...33i160k1j33i21k1.0.zqUsTb0AWH8
Your suspicion was wrong.
ReplyDeleteAgain.
(see previous thread)
.
DeleteDougSun Dec 31, 02:25:00 PM EST
Perhaps you did not notice that was not my tweet.
:o)
Oh, now you are going to start pulling a Trump on us. Put up bullshit and them wash your hands of it. Don't know nothing about it. I just put it up.
Given your constant whine about the media, you can understand why the casual observer might take it a little differently.
.
.
DeleteDougSun Dec 31, 02:26:00 PM EST
Perhaps you are not aware, I do not watch Fox.
Oh, that's right, you get all your hard news from Rush and Adam Corrolla.
.
Oh, now you are going to start pulling a Trump on us. Put up bullshit and them wash your hands of it. Don't know nothing about it. I just put it up.
DeleteGiven your constant whine about the media, you can understand why the casual observer might take it a little differently.
===
...I quoted an article with a link which backs up Dr. Jasser's point of the tendency to see no Islamic evil.
.
DeleteDo you mean the Atlantic article from the beginning of 2015?
.
Newsweek 12/30/17
Delete.
DeleteHardly a telling argument, Dougie.
The Newsweek story is talking an earlier NYT story that came out after the initial Iranian protests started last Thursday. The latest NYT articles on Iran talk about the political protests.
Meanwhile the U.S. Department of State issued a very strong statement on these protests—which rightly regards them as political:
Ya think. The US has been VOA broadcast to stir up the opposition there for years. Since the protests began VOA along with similar stations in the UK and France have been ramping up those broadcasts attempting to feed fuel to the fire.
.
A point by point refutation of Buchanan and Penn should be a piece of cake for resident genius Quirk.
ReplyDelete(Mark Penn is co-director of the Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll and was a pollster for Bill Clinton during six years of his presidency.)
DeleteNothing wrong with nobody but paid co-conspirators seeing the DNC Server or Hillary's 13,000 emails,
Delete...or her server...
Nothing at all.
Much
.
DeleteWhat the hell is wrong with you, haole?
Is your short term memory that bad or are you just that damn stupid?
This will be the fourth or fifth time I've told you guys the following...
- I have said I don't know exactly what happened with Russia during the election.
- I have never accused Trump of anything wrt Russia. I have never accused anyone of anything wrt Russia.
- I have never accused anyone of a crime who has not either confessed to it or been convicted of one.
What I have done...
- I said I can wait until these investigations are complete before making a judgement.
- I have said I am open to all investigations into everything whether it collusion, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, bribery, illegal quid pro quo, you name it.
- I have said I don't care who the investigations are about, Trump, his team, Hillary, her team, or anyone else.
I have also said...
- Despite the whining and the pissing and the moaning from you guys, I have seen nothing that proves Mueller is doing anything but his job in a quiet and professional way.
- I've said calls to end the Mueller investigation are absurd. It will end when it ends. The typical special counsel/prosecutor investigation runs an average of two and a half years. Mueller's has been running for around 8 months.
- The DOJ IG has been investigating many of the questions you dolts having asking about since January. I can wait for the results of that investigation.
- I am open to any further investigations that are launched, into Uranium One for instance. Trump through his AG can have one launched any time he wants to. (I seem to recall him saying in the last couple days that he is not interested in it.)
- Trump and the GOP control the entire government. DOJ and FBI as well as the Congressional committees are under their control. If the don't like what's going on they have the power to change it. The only thing holding them up is any political price they might have to pay.
- I don't know how often I've said the following but let me say it now. A lot of shit that has been going on during the last election and before is pretty slimy stuff. Much of it pushes the envelope and skirts the edge of the law. Some of it may even go over that edge. That said, when all the investigations are over, I suspect you boys are going to be disappointed. These people have been getting away with this stuff all their lives. They may be immoral creeps; they may be corrupt; but proving they actually did anything illegal is near impossible. The system is designed that way.
It's time you Trumpies realize it, 'they are All dicks'.
.
I must say again Happy New Year to Old Quirk, that wonderful flea bitten dog eared old fart !
ReplyDeleteWithout him around there would be no one to mock....
Happy New Year old pooch !!!!
Woof woof woof woof woof
Here one for you Quirk to help you start the New Year off right.....
ReplyDeleteTrump And The Limits Of The Made For TV Reality Star Presidency
See: American Thinker: from The New York Times
Right down your anality.....oops, your alley....
4654 UFO sightings world wide last year.
ReplyDeleteIf the ecological crisis doesn't bring us all together the UFO Crisis damn well should.
.
ReplyDeleteYou approach your Trump stories with the more credulity than you do your UFO stories, old hoss.
Happy New Year
.
Back at you !
DeleteWill 2018 be the year of The Steele Dossier on The Quirkster ?
ReplyDeleteWe can hope !!!!!
ReplyDelete.
Despite the whining and the pissing and the moaning from you guys, I have seen nothing that proves Mueller is doing anything but his job in a quiet and professional way.
.
You're Hilarious!
DeleteAlso pathological.
Delete.
DeleteYou do this all the time. Show me the proof.
Insinuations don't get it.
If there's something there, why doesn't someone in DOJ do something?
Why doesn't Trump do something?
Mueller is simply a paid employer who can be fired for cause.
Wishing and hoping and whining, that's all we ever get from you, Doug.
Relax and have a nice rest of the year and a Happy New Year.
.
By the way, now you've got me interested in that Penn poll. I'm looking for a copy of it to see how the questions are worded. I'll get back to you on it. If not tonight, soon.
.
Happy New Year boys.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteOnw wonders why an Iraqi War vet, a lawyer would not put his trust in "Law Enforcement"
Maybe he thought that all the Law Enforcement institutions in the USA are corrupt and illegitimate.
Gunman ambushed deputies in deadly Douglas County shooting; 1 deputy dead, 6 people wounded
...
A source who spoke to The Denver Post on condition of anonymity identified the gunman as Mathew Riehl, an Iraq war veteran who has posted a number of anti-law-enforcement videos on YouTube. Riehl at one time worked as a lawyer in Rawlins, Wyo
Yeppers, if he couldn't trust a Marine Corps combat veteran and the other senior staffers of the FBI and DOJ ...
DeleteWho could he trust?
You too !!!
ReplyDeleteMeant for Doug Saxum
DeleteThanks Bob!
DeleteEveryone staying warm?
ReplyDelete20 degrees below here.
We're at a balmy 32 here right now.
ReplyDeleteWhere are you, Minnesota ?.
I got off an Amtrak in Minneapolis once into -42.
That was a real shock.
Our other Doug is probably at about 80
DeleteYep, Minnesota.
DeleteWind chill warning until 11 a.m. tomorrow.
Minus 32 expected.
Buuurrrrr!
Been awake since yesterday afternoon. Worked a fifteen hour shift, brunch with the family, and now spending time with the wife.
And beer!
Sounds excellent for you now !!
DeleteThe DOJ And The FBI Rot From The Head Down....So Who Is The Head ?
Brian Joondwph
See: American Thinker
Hint: The name starts with an 'O'
I hope Doug is counting his blessings, or thanking his lucky stars, that he doesn't have to deal with this shit.
DeleteWho were the best pilots in The Battle of Britain ?
ReplyDeleteThe Poles.
See: Last Hope Island
by Lynne Olson
And, they were flying Hurricanes, not Spitfires
DeleteThe women of England loved the Polish pilots.
DeleteAnd even more, Marta Gellhorn, wife of Ernest Hemingway, at a cocktail party given in her honor, seemed swept off her feet, spending the entire evening speaking only with two Polish pilots.
And she had never even met the real thing, Quirk
One can only imagine....
And, let us never forget, it was Polish noggins that were really behind the ENIGMA machine.
DeleteNo wonder The Donald spoke so highly of and to the Poles during his trip to Europe !!
There is a good deal of Eric Severus's WW2 war reporting in this interesting book.h
DeleteSevereid's
DeleteThe Frogs...
Delete'Of the more than 76,000 Jews deported from France to the death camps, more than 90 per cent were rounded up by the French police.'
The Frogs...
Delete'Of the more than 76,000 Jews deported from France to the death camps, more than 90 per cent were rounded up by the French police.'
ReplyDeleteThe DOJ And The FBI Rot From The Head Down....So Who Is The Head
Donald J Trump
Any other answer ...
Another Trump Administration lie
Things are heating up in Iran..
ReplyDeleteSee good article at Hot Air.
At least this time they have at least the verbal support. of the USA.
We need to somehow keep their internet working too.
Report: USA gives Israel go ahead to kill powerful Iranian General.... Drudge
DeleteUSA withholds millions from Pakistan.... Drudge
DeleteThis too is good !
Next we need to get India and Israel INTO NATO and Turkey OUT of NATO.
DeleteAlso at Hot Air:
ReplyDeleteDavid Brock paid $200,000 to bring forward Trump accusers in 2016
Paid for testimony is the best kind
DeleteOne knows exactly what will be said !!!
Question of the Day
ReplyDeleteIs Quirk hung over ?
2019.10.29台北市八大行業酒店上班即時新聞:隨著近年知名網紅跨國賣淫，讓酒店工作市場發展酒店小姐接S(性交易)崛起，然而有特別性服務文化仍為消費者的青睞，如:顏射(精子射在臉上) 、口交口爆(精子射在嘴裡) 、戴套肛交進行交易專業精緻化，也大大提昇上班族願意酒店兼職提高薪資水平，尋找優秀人員的意願。本次大學生酒店兼差有為1節最高可達$200元，對於找兼職求職者可以說是敞開大門，彈性排班的多元酒店上班就業機會，釋出兼差兼職酒店打工最高可達$100K。本週還邀請「知名酒店經紀有限公司」，以[翻轉低薪、搶救年輕人]為軸心，致力於推動八大行業酒店上班為目標。歡迎就業、轉職、兼職需求的民眾把握難得八大行業徵才酒店小姐的機會，著正式服裝至現場與徵才直接面試，找到合適的酒店工作。
ReplyDelete2019.10.30知名酒店經紀調查酒店上班顯示，2019年酒店工作酒店打工有將近7成的上班族有意願酒店兼差在八大行業擔任酒店兼職坐檯小姐或打工，其中在中山區林森北路以及忠孝東路上的便服店酒店兼職的有(54.6%)，比在白天正職的比例(29.8%)更高。進一步女大學生、上班族詢問未來想投入八大行業酒店兼差的比例達到7成3，其中想在八大行業擔任酒店小姐兼職有(17.8%)，想擔任正職的有(23.9%)。知名酒店打工專業指出產業來進行交叉分析，結果發現，目前在傳產製造業的上班族想在八大行業兼職酒店小姐的比例最高，而服務業想投入兼職酒店小姐擔任正職的比例最高。主要的原因包括對客人買全場接S(性交易)額外收入感到有興趣(32.3%)想為未來事業多認識企業的大老闆(29%)、喜歡跟人相處(30%)以及酒店工作機會多(31%)、酒店工時彈性(16.5%)等原因。
ReplyDelete2020.05.22酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容公關、陪侍乃至於性工作者通常不是酒店、舞廳、包廂KTV或養生館的直屬員工，他們我在酒店上班的日子在經紀人的帶領下，前往與經紀公司合作的酒店打工地點上班，比起雇傭更貼近承攬，沒店可以上工時就直接放無薪假，在政府勞動統計上他們等於是失業人口，申請失業救濟金是天方夜譚。酒店並無底薪保障，公關酒店上班-酒店兼職-兼差如何達成人生的第一桶金要客人點選坐檯才有薪水，而且店家會在發薪時扣除稅金，卻不會幫忙投保勞健保。依照 八大行業是哪八種行業呢?業績高低，酒店從公關的薪資中扣除400元到1,000元不等的營業稅，檯費也不是公關全部收進口袋裡，必須與酒店和趴客幹部、經紀人分潤，以350元的節薪而言，常見酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？ 的配比是酒店與趴客幹部150元、小姐150元、經紀人50元，這個配比會依照小姐的外在條件、與經紀人和經紀公司的協議、是否有債務和借貸關係而有調整。錢的問題一向複雜，八大行業金流不患寡而患不均，事情每經過一個人的手，就必須給人抽成，如何打點每個關卡是極為細膩的功夫。客人的帳單上看不到公關們被扣款的部分，也看不到勞動權益被忽略的細節，更不要提酒店內物價奇幻，小姐們別在身上的名牌，一個要收500到1,000元的製作費，在公司休息室租用儲物櫃，也是以每星期千元為計價單位，小姐向公司團購質料粗劣的應景服飾，價格是網拍的十倍，並且每個星期收送洗費上千元，化妝、髮型與服裝不符合規定一項扣500元以上，店家也有各自的內規，例如遲到一分鐘扣50元，開會不到扣3,000元，遲到兩小時就要自己大框自己，也就是買下一整天60節的上班時間，立刻失血21,000元－－要在這些條條框框後賺到錢，沒兩把刷子真難，八大也分三六九等，一張酒店收據不代表整個產業的全貌。
ReplyDelete2020.06.17酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容今年4月國內出現首例酒店女公關確診武漢肺炎，為防堵疫情，中央流行疫情指揮中心宣布，自4月9日起，全國酒店、舞廳停止營業，直到5月中疫情趨緩，各縣市才陸續解除禁令，但在我在酒店上班的日子八大行業歇業期間不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因，淋病感染卻意外激增，5月底確診數竟比過去3年同期平均數上升逾8成，醫師推測酒店上班-酒店兼職-兼差如何達成人生的第一桶金，這與性交易轉往地下化有關。根據疾病管制署酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？傳染病統計資料，性傳染病中淋病感染者近期顯著上升，比較2017、2018、2019與今年1月到6月初數據職場須知 【酒店PT 】，發現2017年在這段時間累計有2166例，2018年同期則有1903例，2019年同期為1875人確診，但2020年同期則有2574人確診，比前3年都高。再細看國內八大行業禁令與淋病成長趨勢，可發現淋病確診在八大行業4月9日喊卡當周有109例，到了5月第2周升高至135例，接下來有些微下降，但到5月最後1周又飆到142例，創下今年單周最高紀錄，和前3年同期平均數相較，更足足暴漲86.6%，且到了下一周、即6月第一周，仍有133 例，顯示疫情仍在高峰。至於同樣是性病的梅毒，確診個案則未明顯增加。針對八大行業禁令與淋病感染增加的關係，林口長庚醫院男性學及婦女泌尿科主任陳煜說，應與消費生態與客群產生變化有關，因酒店的消費較高，帶出場的門檻也高，但酒店歇業後，小姐還是要生活，只好轉入地下，進行性交易的頻率可能提高，才導致淋病增加。陳煜解釋，過去有研究發現，私下進行性交易的客群，以中下層、低消費的族群較多，而這些人使用保險套的情形也較不普遍，發生性病的風險偏高。淋病感染激增，梅毒疫情卻沒有擴大，對此陳煜認為，染淋症狀明顯，常有尿道灼熱感，且性器會流出黃綠色濃液，而梅毒感染初期可能僅有輕微的皰疹，較不容易發現，所以才有兩種性病趨勢大不同的特殊現象。疾管署副署長莊人祥說，近期確實發現淋病確診明顯增加，從年齡層分析，以20歲到29歲增幅最大，比去年1月至5月增逾300例；30歲到39歲也增約百例，且男多於女，增加個案以六都為主；至於與八大行業禁令的關係，他則說，詳細原因仍待疾管署進行相關調查。
ReplyDelete2020.07.03酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容酒店小姐去酒店上班都一定要出場接s嗎？我在酒店上班的日子告訴你八大行業的真相!
ReplyDelete許多來酒店應徵的小姐都一定會詢問，請問: 到酒店上班當酒店小姐就一定要出場陪睡接s嗎？其實現在的酒店已不像大家刻版印象中的不人道。不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因1998年以前到酒店上班的小姐客人看上了酒店小姐想帶小姐出去，酒店小姐上班通常會取什麼名字?店家確實一定會強迫小姐陪睡出場接S。
現在是文明的時代也是Google網路搜尋資訊的年代了! 酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？酒店的環境變化很大，由以前傳統制度酒店小姐去酒店上班都一定要出場接s嗎？演化改為人性化管理，也就是因為酒店業者增多各家【百家爭鳴】酒店競爭大，各家酒店業者透過【開放自由管理方式】，來招募更多的酒店小姐。
所以現在的酒店也不會像電影/電視連續劇一樣，強制小姐一定要跟客人出場，現在酒店上班將酒店小姐出場的方式改為小姐個人意願，客人要帶小姐出場時會告知小姐要去那裡，只要小姐不願意跟客人出去店家沒人能逼妳，有些酒店只有規定小姐出場只需陪客人到客人想去的地方(例如:吃消夜 續攤 錢櫃 夜店 )當然也會告知雙方(有床的地方不能去 例如:妳家/客人家/旅館/飯店/辦公室)苗頭不對可立即離開。
也不可能要求小姐跟客人出去就一定要接S，當然也會有部份小姐因為想賺取更多的收入，而跟客人私下交易自已接S，所以酒店小姐到酒店上班出場接S完全屬於小姐個人行為，也不必擔心說到酒店上班就一定要出場或接S的。(我們絕對不會去勉強妳,我梁曉尊也不願意強迫小姐 做她不想做的事。)
每個行業都很辛苦!賺錢的工作沒有一份是輕鬆的，但我相信每個人都有她的底線(尤其是女人)。你們將來都是有夢想的是會嫁人的，不需要這麼犧牲。
2020.07.26今年不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因4月初台北市知名酒店女公關確診，引發「酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容全台酒店歇業」，復業之後政府也祭出實名制，讓所有上門的客人都要登記證件，如果業者被查獲連續3次沒有落實，將勒令歇業。不過我在酒店上班的日子確診女公關的酒店似乎根本沒在怕，18日警方上門抽查，就發現業者居然為了攬客，通融7名酒客未登記身分，後續酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？案件也將交給衛生局裁罰。酒店公關小姐排排站，拿身分證配合查驗單位查驗身份，酒店小姐上班通常會取什麼名字?5月底北市酒店解封，但當初開放復工條件可是相當多。酒店小姐去酒店上班都一定要出場接s嗎？：「今天實施臨檢也是要配合店家來做防疫的工作。」這裡是林森北路的酒店一條街，酒店大解封後，民眾現在上門消費都拿出身分證來實名登記。當時CDC曾經公布，北市一家酒店的女公關小姐J小姐（確診）武漢肺炎，因此全台酒店都來關閉，而且網友當時還封這是（國定）上岸日，沒有想到酒店解封之後，就在6月中的時候，警方來做稽查卻發現同一天有7名的酒客沒有落實登記實名制。警方都傻眼，不是1個、2個，一個晚上同一家業者被抓出7人未登記，但業者喊冤說有工作人員，但坦承確實為了業績違反規定。北市衛生局疾管科長余燦華：「依據傳染病防治法，對（初犯）業者裁處3千以上1萬元以下罰鍰，如果3次累加的違規事項，我們會請他們先停止營業。」由於業者申訴案件調查當中，但酒客未落實實名制是事實，後續將被開罰，台灣疫情趨緩，回歸正常生活，但出入複雜又幾乎近距離接觸的酒店，就怕相關單位不嚴查重罰，實名制淪為玩假的。
ReplyDelete2020.08.28不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因新北市新莊半夜發生古惑仔命案，1名29歲張姓酒店經紀，昨夜11時許遭人押走凌虐並丟包河堤旁，全身瘀青、奄奄一息，正巧被約會情侶驚見報案，張男送醫後不治，酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容3名兇嫌闖下大禍，藏匿躲藏半天，2名20多歲男子下午主動投案，目前偵訊我在酒店上班的日子中。檢警下午在板橋殯儀館相驗屍體釐清死因，警方循線鎖定1部白色轎車從蘆洲觀音山將張男載往新莊丟包，隨後往桃園方向逃逸，並策動20多歲的楊姓主嫌投案，楊男到案後，接續聯絡另名同夥到案，警方正調查釐清為何擄人痛毆，甚至引起殺機。新莊警消25日晚間11時20分獲報大漢溪旁的19號越堤道有民眾路倒，到場發現傷者全身是傷、右小腿遭利器刺穿，意識模糊，經輔大醫院搶救後宣告不治，警方組成專案小組，迅速在樹林一處摩鐵尋獲犯案白色轎車，並在4點前策動主嫌投案。
ReplyDelete2020.09.25【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】的基本介紹跟工作內容讓對方主動接近的密技這種酒店小姐具備了極高的專業精神，因為她們意識到酒店酒店上班小姐上班只有趁年輕的時候才能多賺一點，不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因並確實達到店內的業績標準，酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？時常將薪酬的最高標準銘記在心。反觀，如果你因為酒店小姐給你聯絡方式，感到沾沾自喜，那麼你可能會受到她要求同行或出遊的攻勢，酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容短時間內就賠光自己的積蓄，然後再被她拋棄。斷絕金錢往來，也代表雙方緣分到了盡頭，千萬不要由愛生恨，變成恐怖的跟蹤狂。酒店內是男女偽裝戀愛的舞台，為了要追求專業酒店小姐，客人必須建立一套自己的「虛擬世界」，以對抗店家或酒店小姐的「虛擬世界」，這才是最快速的捷徑。這是因為酒店提供了男性美夢般的環境，男客人也可以反過來給酒店小姐一個美好的夢。若是拚命不斷地去酒店消費，只會被人看作是心術不正的「金主」。店小姐甚至會有兩支手機，一支工作用，一支私人用。專業的小姐與白天也很忙碌的兼職小姐不同，她們看準可能成為「金主」的客人，願意花自己的下班時間來經營關係。為了避免對方要求同行或出遊，你可以偽造某IT企業的公司負責人名片，假裝自己很忙碌的樣子。記得不要對酒店小姐露出色瞇瞇的表情，要讓她看見你紳士般的風采，絕對不要顯露洋洋得意的態度。之所以穿西裝，是因為可以製造「制服效果」。精緻的包包或鞋子不用說了，一定是基本配備，至於會在酒店小姐面前拿出來的皮夾，也必須精心準備。為了取得信任而亮出來給對方看的錢，至少也要十萬日圓的鈔票，把皮夾塞得滿滿的。這樣的小動作，就能讓具備專業的酒店小姐眼神為之一亮。這麼一來，你只要扮演好能夠讓酒店小姐不把你當成「一般客人」、而是有機會發展成朋友或戀人的角色，就能輕鬆實現從下班約會直接升級成上賓館的計畫。回頭來看，你如果頻繁去店裡消費、每月投入二、三十萬日圓，但只要被認定為「一般客人」，是無法成功追求到對方的。你應該要把錢花在自己所扮演的角色上。用這個方式來追求的話，攻陷人氣第一名的酒店小姐有如囊中取物。不過也要提醒一件事，當你隔天見到酒店小姐的素顏時，希望你不會因為好像看到另一個人而嚇得腿都軟了。然後，你可以用穿西裝不打領帶的爽朗姿態，在酒店即將打烊之際走進店裡，高貴地邀請她一起吃飯，「在六本木有家藝人投資的酒吧，是我朋友開的，方便的話要不要一起去呢？」目標是要在她的下班時間成功邀約。
ReplyDelete恩客誆酒店妹出場逞慾2020.12.07【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】指出，被告周男經常光顧被害女子酒店工作的酒店，還專點被害女子上檯捧場，今年5月酒店打工，被害女子因陪周男喝醉了，周男表示願意誆她出場並送她回家休息，被害女子原以為可早點下班，結果卻被周男帶到旅館，直到她驚覺下體有異物插入才驚醒。被害女子事後對周男提告對她指侵，周男到案後辯稱，與酒店上班女子是戀人關係，先前已發生過多次性關係，坦言事發當天曾用手指插入被害女子下體，但酒店兼差女子卻說「沒感覺」、「不想」時就立即停止。檢方庭訊時勘驗被害女子酒醒後與周男的對話錄音，發現被害女子情緒激動，加上案發前被害女子曾傳簡訊給酒店幹部：「真討厭跟這男的出去」，認定兩人非男女朋友關係，且女子下體又驗出周男DNA檢體，女子事後又出現創傷後壓力症候群，認定周男有性侵之實。
ReplyDelete