“This site is dedicated to preying on peoples vanity, ignorance, or loneliness, gaining their trust and betraying them without remorse.”

Friday, September 28, 2012

What really happened in Benghazi?

This morning, the NY Times is still causing this a crime. It very may well be both a terror attack and a crime. I did not publish the entire article that appeared in  Canada here.

Prelude to attack


In the days and weeks leading up to the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, the U.S. Department of State received at least three warnings of not only impending violence, but of U.S. embassies being specifically targeted. One warning was specific to the U.S. embassy in Cairo, which was directly related to the current imprisonment of the “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel-Rahman, the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Others specified the Libyan embassy.
On September 9, 2012, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security reportedly received a warning that stated “[t]he time has come for a strong movement from you, O sons of Egypt, to release the detained sheikh…Let your slogan be: No to the American embassy in Egypt until our detained sheikh is released. Starting now, let the faithful among you form follow-up committees in charge of taking the necessary measures to force America to release the sheikh, even if it requires burning the embassy down with everyone in it.”
The warnings in the week before the attack were received while Ambassador Stevens was traveling in Germany, Austria and Sweden. Accordingly, it is important to determine whyAmbassador Stevens was at the consulate office in Benghazi during a time of heightened threat, was he made aware of the increased threat situation by the Clinton State Department, and who was responsible for the safety and security of Ambassador Stevens and what actually happened in Benghazi?
Research, investigation and confirmation from one source within the U.S. government found that in the situation involving Stevens, protection of the U.S. consulate was provided in large part by an organization known as “the Martyrs of the Feb. 17 Revolution Brigade.” This is a local Libyan militia led by Fawzi abu Kataf, who has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It is now being reported that the “protection team,” specifically the leaders of the Martyrs of the Feb. 17 Revolution Brigade received orders from a senior Libyan government official to stand down during the coordinated attack against the U.S. Consulate.
It is unclear whether Ambassador Stevens was made aware of the threats, but it would logical to believe that he was not aware of the stand-down order or the impending attack. Regardless, it is important to determine what Ambassador Stevens’ mission was in Benghazi along with Foreign Service officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

On the ground in Benghazi: timeline


Prior to any overt attack, it is vital to note that FSO Sean Smith, known as vile_rat in the online gaming community, posted the following disturbing message to an open gaming forum:“vile_rat: assuming we don’t die tonight. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.” Investigation suggests that FSO Smith was referencing a member of the Martyrs of the Feb. 17 Revolution Brigade.
8:00 p.m.: Sometime around 8:00 p.m., Ambassador Stevens completed a meeting with the Turkish Consul General, allegedly at the Benghazi compound. Contrary to the insistence of the Obama administration, there were no Muslim protestors at or around the compound. This was substantiated by CBS News and also The New York Times.
9:30-10:30 p.m.: At or about 9:30 p.m. local time, Muslim terrorists attacked the consulate from three sides with rocket propelled grenade launchers and laser sighted weapons, breaching the walls that surrounded the property. No security forces were present to repel the attack. It was reported that upwards of twenty Americans were inside of the compound at this time, although this has yet to be confirmed.
10:30 p.m. The attackers gain access to the interior portion of the compound. Reports suggest that only Ambassador Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were inside and failed in their attempt to repel the attackers.
It was during this time that Libyan government reinforcements arrived. One of the reinforcements allegedly makes it inside, finds the body of Sean Smith, but is unable to locate the Ambassador. It was also during this time that the attackers storm the rear portion of the compound. The reinforcements retreat to a safe-house located about one-half mile away.
12:30 a.m. The attackers are seen on video pulling the body of Ambassador Stevens from the compound while shouting praises to Allah.
1:00 - 3:30 a.m.: Accounts as to the location of Ambassador Stevens vary, but it is confirmed that his body was located at the Benghazi Medical Center at approximately 3:30 a.m.
Numerous reports suggest that Ambassador Stevens suffered either ante-mortem or post-mortem injuries suggestive of sodomy. Additional reports also suggest that numerous classified documents were recovered from the consulate office by the attackers.
It was almost immediately following public reports of the attack that U.S. government officials, including Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, asserted that the attack on the U.S. embassy were the direct result of the video Innocence of Muslims. They also publicly stated that the attacks were spontaneous, there was no pre-planning involved in the attack, and cell phone video taken of Ambassador Stevens being pulled from the compound was documentation of a rescue attempt.
In consideration of the above information, it is clear that this administration is being disingenuous in their continued denials that (1) the attack was spontaneous; (2) a video, virtually unknown until after the 9/11 Libyan attacks, is behind these attacks; (3) they had no advance warning of impending attacks. So, where does this leave us?

Interview with Steve Klein, video spokesman


After a 90-minute interview on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report with Steven Klein, the spokesman for the video that can be heard here, it would appear that there are even more questions than answers with regard to this video.
Mr. Klein stated that he agreed to be a spokesman for the producers of the film after they were forced into hiding by the blowback from the negative publicity, yet denied knowing much about the production or providence of the video. However, he described those who were involved in creating the video as “refugees” who initially approached him, before the video even entered the production phase, with questions about First Amendment issues. He refused to identify the individuals behind the video by name, citing concern for their safety and protection. His rather cavalier attitude, in addition to his claims of not knowing a number of critical details of the production and providence of the video suggests either an incredible level of naivet√© or perhaps something else. Based on my professional investigative assessment, I am compelled to believe the latter.

Conclusion


At this point, I have a better grasp of the lies, misinformation and disinformation associated with the video and our government’s exploitation of it than I do solid truths.
This video appeared to come out of nowhere and seems to have been amateurishly produced. It is so poorly done that many are still unable to determine whether it was created as a parody or if it was a serious attempt at some type of documentary. It is interesting to note that among those who claim they don’t know is Mr. Klein, the current spokesman for the video. This is problematic and troublesome to say the least.
If my investigative findings are correct, there appear to be some very disconcerting ties between this video and individuals and entities associated with our own government. The official narrative of everyone from Obama to Rice to Obama presidential campaign advisor Robert Gibbs is that this specific video is to blame for the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans in Libya.
Clearly, their continued assertions in the face of contrary evidence suggests something much larger. The video appears to be serving multiple purposes. It appears to be a multi-faceted catalyst by seemingly opposing parties to advance different agendas. One might be to suppress any criticism of Islam and ultimately restrict our freedom of speech - both religious and political dissent, while the other is to foment chaos in Islamic countries as a means to an end.
Despite the gradual awakening of people to the larger agendas, both agendas seem to be working. My investigation is continuing.

53 comments:

  1. Just saw Obama 2016.

    Anti-Americanism and anti-Colonialism is behind the Obama movement.

    Romney Believes in America. He loves America. He does not apologize for America. If you Love America, vote for Mitt Romney.

    Go see the movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .

      Good to see you stop by, Whit, even if it's only for a political endorsement.

      Hope you and yours are doing well.

      .

      Delete
    2. Hi Whit, LTNS.

      My take on the Benghazi thing is that libs want to paint Muslims in the best light possible because they are "downtrodden" and Romney wants to go the other way to appear strong, but both sides are just talking about symbols, labels, the shadows of the incident. Give me details. You report, I decide.

      Delete
    3. Hi Whit - Good movie for sure. Further, I've been reading all of d'Souza. Wonderful man, very good Christian apologist(in the good sense) well worth the time reading.

      Was going to post some quotes but must have more time.

      Rufus, for instance, has been maintaining, between drinks, how all religions make things worse. D'Souza has an excellent chapter on this very subject, how the Christian influence freed the slaves, from Europe to here, once it got influence in society. Even the Cherokee had to give it up, at last. Was a long process.

      Also how bad things got when the atheists took over certain places last century.

      I've been holding down a Republican campaign headquarters for three hours a day!

      Everyone here needs a job!

      Delete
  2. If he loves America so much, why doesn't he "Bank" here?

    Vote Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vote for American Jobs, and Renewable Energy.

    Vote Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mitt Romney demonstrated in favor of the War in Vietnam, AND in favor of the Draft.

    Then, while 58,000 American Boys, many of them draftees, were getting killed over there HE was laying on the beach in France, deferment firmly in hand. Fuck him and his "magic underpants deferment," I'll vote for the American.

    I'll Vote for Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .

      Oh, really good point, especially when you stack it up against Obama's vast military experiance.

      .

      Delete
    2. Obama never Demonstrated "In Favor of a War, and Draft," then took a deferment.

      I've had enough chickenhawks to last me the rest of my lifetime; I don't need any more.

      Delete
  5. There was a little bill in Congress that would have authorized "cost of living" increases for Veterans "Survivors" Benefits. The GOP put a "Hold" on it.

    The Senate Republicans filibustered a bi-partisan Veterans Jobs Bill right before they went home to campaign.

    The GOP, during the worst drought in 60 years, refused to pass the Farm Bill.

    "These" are the "Americans" you want me to vote for?

    I don't think so.

    I'm voting Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jug ears has sent more GI’s to their deaths than Romney has by a factor of 1938 to Romeney’s 0.

    Jug Ears wins big time in killing US military personnel for no reason.

    Support pointless military deaths, re-elect the Nobel Laureate, a proven killer, Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jug Ears got the troops out of Iraq, much to the consternation, and gnashing of teeth of Magic Underpants, and the GOP, and he's systematically disengaging from Afghanistan.

    Meanwhile Magic Underpants hires the same neocon advisors that got us into these messes.

    I'm voting Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Meanwhile, Magic Underpants wants to gut my VA Benefits, and raise my taxes, while lowering his own (the ones he pays, anyway.)

    Vote Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I KNEW you'd play the underwear card sooner or later.

      Delete
    2. It's more relevant than calling someone "Jug Ears."

      Obama was born with those ears; Romney chooses to wear those magic drawers.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I like the cut of Obama's jib on Trade. He's promoted free trade agreements, but, at least in some cases, when China tried to take advantage of us (Tires, Solar Panels, Wind Towers, Auto Parts) he jerked a knot in their tail.

    Romney, and the pubs, of course, wailed, and rendt their garments.

    Vote Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Let's be honest. Romney's "business plan" was one of two things:

    1) Load the company up with debt, get the cash out, and take bankruptcy; thus screwing the banks, the shareholders, the Workers, and the government (me and you) who had to take over the pensions, Or

    2) Fire all the workers, and move the plant to China; thus screwing the workers, and the government (me and you.)

    For an American to vote for this asshole would be like a turkey voting for Thanksgiving.

    Vote Jug Ears.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oops, bad news for the magic underpants crowd; even Rasmussen has gone positive for Jug Ears.

    Mittbot better wear Two pairs of magic skivvies to the debate. He's in a bit of a jam.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jug Ears tripled the troops in afpak. Changed the rules that have caused more deaths and wounded in 3 years than Bush in 8 there. Now that Jug Ears ran away from Iraq, Iraq is firmly in the pocket of Iran which is now using Iraqi airspace to ship troops and weapons to syria

    yep jug ears gets a whole lot of Americans murdered....

    he done got the ambassador raped and murdered too....

    but rufus is voting for him...

    says a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It says I don't like chickenhawk, draftdodgers of any stripe -

      whether they're running for President, or denigrating me on a blog.

      Delete
    2. The part that just killed me was that the asshole DEMONSTRATED FOR THE DRAFT, and Then RAN OFF TO FRACE. I wouldn't vote for a motherfucker that would do that to pick up garbage.

      Delete
    3. If I agreed with him on every other issue I'd vote against him because of that.

      Delete
    4. We should all think carefully about the issues, then get dead drunk, fall off the barstool, roll into the recruiting office, and say the fuck with it.

      Delete
  14. A Higgs boson walks into a Catholic church. The priest tells it to leave.

    The boson says, "You can't kick me out. Without me, you can't have mass!"

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dyadic discovered the fungus in nature 20 years ago in Russia, Mark Emalfarb, Dyadic president and CEO told Ethanol Producer Magazine. Its first intended use was to wash blue jeans, which is, after all, a cellulosic material. The company has spent the last 20 years improving it and thanks to a serendipitous mutation, was able to improve its performance level by 100s of times, he said. Along the way it was discovered that the fungus was ideal for use in producing sugars from biomass, including tolerance to a wide pH range and high temperatures. That, plus advances in genome sequencing, allowed Dyadic to go “from jeans with a ‘j’ to genes with a ‘g’,” he said.

    Dyadic has worked with Abengoa BioEnergy scientists to use the C1 technology to develop a specific cellulosic enzyme strain for use at the company’s 25 MMgy cellulosic ethanol plant currently under construction in Hugoton, Kansas. Codexis Inc. used Dyadic’s base C1 technology and created its own version of the technology, Emalfarb said. Beyond biofuels, the company is also working with partners in the feed, food and pharmaceutical industries to take what was learned about breaking down cellulose and apply it more broadly.

    Continuous Research

    ReplyDelete
  16. The once unstoppable Obama movement has constipated to a halt. He was once a god, and now he is man -- a nasty, unsuccessful man, who blames everyone and everything for his serial failures.

    After all is said and done, what is he left with? The same hardcore group of delusional ideologues who would vote for him even if they came home from work and caught him beating their grandmothers to death with his Nobel Prize -- but these voters were never in play anyway.

    Obama is going to lose in a landslide. And Barack Obama, the media, and the polling organizations will be appropriately shocked.

    Shocked, I say!

    Round up the usual suspects.


    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/its_over.html#ixzz27npCn1na



    Hard day at the office today. Friday afternoon no one gives a damn about politics. Sanity prevails.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Fauxcohauntus in deep bison do-do

    Practicing law without a license.

    September 28, 2012
    'Gamechanger': Elizabeth Warren practiced law in Massachusetts federal court without law license
    Thomas Lifson

    A prominent defender of Elizabeth Warren's legal work while on the Harvard faculty has been presented with new facts and conceded that she is in heap big trouble. I wrote about Mark Thompson's defense of her right to file briefs in federal court three days ago. But the remarkable William Jacobson of Legal Insurrection has now discovered that Warren represented a Massachusetts client in Massachusetts, and Thompson has conceded the case.

    Professor Jacobson has uncovered this morning a case in which Elizabeth Warren entered an appearance in a federal appellate court as a representative of a Massachusetts client in a case that appears to have clearly implicated Massachusetts law. Although this is still a federal appellate court, because we're dealing with a Massachusetts client and issues of Massachusetts law, this looks really, really bad for Professor Warren. With this bombshell, I would no longer view the case against her as weak.

    For the moment, this imbroglio may be confined to the conservative blogosphere, with the legal and media establishments playing defense for Warren (read Prof. Jacobson's discussion of the extraordinary "'personal' commentary offered by Michael Fredrickson, the General Counsel of the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers" made in defense of Warren. But this is serious, and has legal consequences for Warren.

    William Jacobson is in the process of a historic achievement, the takedown of an arrogant liberal phony who acts as if rules are made for the little people. I do believe the tenacious legal research and analysis of his has sunk her candidacy. That may be wishful thinking, but I don't see how she recovers. I doff my cap to Bill with deep respect.


    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/09/gamechanger_elizabeth_warren_practiced_law_in_massachusetts_court_without_law_license.html#ixzz27nqBvKFD


    ....

    Them Cherokee.

    O, wait, she's not a Cherokee, my bad.

    Them democrats, that's better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That white woman has a real problem with the truth.

      Delete
  18. I don't know who Whit @ 7:42 is but it not me...the real whit.

    ReplyDelete
  19. and by the way. Thanks for the nice words and remember this:

    Jug heads vote for jug ears

    the real whit

    ReplyDelete
  20. How do we know which is the real Whit? Howdy to the real one!

    ReplyDelete

  21. Two percentage points separate President Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney in a state poll conducted for the Tribune-Review, even though the campaigns largely are ignoring Pennsylvania and concentrating on other battlegrounds.



    Read more: http://triblive.com/home/2641005-74/obama-percent-romney-poll-voters-pennsylvania-leads-lee-margin-points#ixzz27ocjv4Z6

    I knew jug-ears could not be up by ten in pennsy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Umm, I don' know, Deuce. You might want to look at

      Realclear Politics - Pennsylvania

      Delete
    2. First rule of polling might be to be wary of a poll by a small local outfit that goes very much contrary to what the big-time pros are coming up with.

      Delete
  22. Here's a surprising new fact about energy in the United States: the percentage of our electricity coming from the greenest sources — that is, the non-hydroelectric renewables such as solar, wind, geothermal and biomass — has doubled in just four years to nearly 6 percent. (Thanks to climate uberblogger Joe Romm for uncovering this data from the Energy Information Agency).

    This significant win for clean energy has gone mostly unnoticed in the press. If anything, the story has been the opposite: recent reports herald the decline of wind, and for a year the media has made a big deal out of the demise of solar panel manufacturer Solyndra.

    Given this negative drumbeat, it's not surprising that the business world tends to perceive renewable energy as an altruistic, rather than fiscally prudent, investment. But this view is dead wrong. The renewable energy industry is growing very fast... and not because it's a philanthropic effort.

    Let's look at . . . . . . .

    The Supposed Decline of Green Energy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .

      Given this negative drumbeat, it's not surprising that the business world tends to perceive renewable energy as an altruistic, rather than fiscally prudent, investment...


      Stupidest thing I've ever heard.

      If these guys are basing their business decisions on news reports rather than facts, we're in a world of shit. Or rather they are.

      .

      Delete
  23. Especially when it is contrary to what Rufus thinks, believes, hopes. Etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course there is only one poll that counts.

      Delete
  24. Rufus just wants a new free phone. He likes being kept down on the plantation with all the other useful idiots. The party of hate, division, and bleeding heart tightwads. That's Rufus' party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are aware that that cell phone program is a Bush Program, right? Right?

      Delete
    2. hmmm, got awful quiet all of a sudden.

      Delete
  25. Whit

    Did you get moved to TX?

    By the way Rufus wouldn't go see 2016 if you bought him a ticket and popcorn. He doesn't like getting confused by the facts.

    ReplyDelete
  26. .

    Clapper joins the fray.

    The office of the nation’s spy chief issued a statement Friday defending the Obama administration’s accounts of the siege on a U.S. mission in Libya, saying it became clear only in the aftermath that it was “a deliberate and organized terrorist attack...”

    The release marks a rare instance in which the intelligence director’s office has weighed in through a public statement on details of an event overseas, let alone one that remains under investigation during a presidential campaign. In an e-mail, Turner indicated that the director’s office, while seeking to stay out of the political fray, became convinced that it should clarify the intelligence community’s position.

    “I put out the message because I think it’s important that people understand that early reports are often wrong or incomplete, but our intelligence community continues to work around the clock to gather details and understand exactly what happened in Benghazi,” Turner said...



    If they didn't know what happened initially, why did they say anything? Lying or incompetance, which is worse?

    What I meant to say.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  27. .

    Fars News Agency, a semi-official mouth piece of the Iranian regime, earnestly published a word-for-word duplicate of an article from the Onion, a spoof news organisation based in Chicago.

    The satirical article cited a fake Gallup poll which found that 77 per cent of white, rural voters would rather go to a baseball game or have a beer with Mr Ahmadinejad than with the US president.

    It went on to cite a made-up West Virginian named Dale Swiderski, who said that he preferred the Iranian to Mr Obama because: "He takes national defense seriously, and he'd never let some gay protesters tell him how to run his country like Obama does..."



    I'll take Ahmadinejad.


    .

    ReplyDelete
  28. .

    The WaPo printed the following article purporting to offer a legal basis for an US attack on Iran.

    The legality of attacking Iran

    Here is some info on the authors of the article

    Registered Foreign Agents

    .

    ReplyDelete
  29. LE AVVENTURE DELLA PRINCIPESSA RONDINE

    Fiaba con morale: La Giustizia secondo gli uccelli

    BAMBINI E FIABE

    C’era una volta, una Principessa Rondine che viveva nel giardino di uno zoo,
    lei amava volteggiare ed aprire le sue ali, improvvisando voli vertiginosi, immaginando che le specie di animali che incontrava avessero la sua stessa bonta’ d’animo ed onestà .
    Ahimè, le cose non stavano esattamente come lei pensava , o , almeno con la sua buona fede credeva che certi valori venissero condivisi anche dai rapaci piu’ feroci che popolavano il giardino dello zoo.
    Cosi’, un giorno, si accorse che i rapaci feroci la sfruttavano e la derubavano imbrogliandola da anni e non volevano nemmeno riconoscerle niente per il suo operato ne tantomeno fare giustizia ai torti a lei perpetrati in quanto era in loro potere, perché come per gli “umani” ogni essere vivente ha delle gerarchie e rispetta regole di giustizia .
    E cosi’, si mise a pensare , a pensare, penso’ cosi’ intensamente che in un fulmine di secondo tutto le apparve chiaro.

    Lei sottostava a regole di vita dettate dai rapaci piu’ crudeli e feroci dello zoo che la volevano denudata di ogni bene, incatenata , alla sua condizione di inferiorità perché solo in questo modo loro potevano trarne ingiusto profitto dai suoi giuochi e derubarla, impedendole di volteggiare con le sue ali, eh, gliele avevano spezzate apposta facendo finta di proteggerla e facendo finta di insegnarle cose, pero’, nelle loro menzogne, aveva riconosciuto le cose vere , e carpito i loro segreti .
    Cosi’ penso’, facendoglielo sapere come in una fiaba, come le casualità della vita sono strane……….
    I rapaci piu’ feroci , guardiani del cielo, l’avevano derubata , e permesso ad altri senza intervenire, di fare altrettanto, rubandole il nido.
    Ma in realtà lo avevano fatto solo a loro stessi, perché cosi’ facendo, o cosi’ permettendo, in realtà , l’avevano resa ricca , ricca di esperienza nel capire cosa fosse la malafede di chi dovrebbe tutelare la giustizia, ed invece di farlo non lo fa , per cattiveria, e , siccome non aveva piu’ beni materiali come un nido dove riposare, era inattaccabile sotto ogni punto di vista , e, come nelle gerarchie degli uccelli……Non avendo più le ali , quando il capo dei piccioni…..disgustato di quanto vide le chiese se avesse avuto bisogno del suo aiuto, per costruirsi un nuovo futuro lei accetto’ di buon grado ,e, siccome era onesta,
    sorridendo rispose:
    Io sono povera di beni materiali, ma il tuo lavoro lo paghero’ con i loro segreti
    E questo fa di me la vera Principessa Rondine.
    Lola Marini Pediamic LBM



    ReplyDelete


  30. IL GIGANTE GRADASSO

    FIABA CON MORALE


    C’era una volta un Gigante Gradasso che viveva in uno Stato , portava degli strani stivali, con tacchi molto alti adornati da speroni.
    Amava molto giocare a calcio, specialmente con la Giustizia , il suo pallone, era di forma triangolare , contrariamente ai palloni normali rotondi più simile nella forma alla Sicilia, ma senza il gusto delle arance che essa produce......
    Era molto colto, possedeva grandi libri di svariati codici ed aveva studiato , contrariamente alla scimmietta Belfagor che aveva incatenato……
    Il Gigante Gradasso che incateno’ la scimmietta Belfagor pero’ non si accorse di come è facile cadere, da tacchi molto alti se non si rispettano le regole di gravità camminando sospesi ad un tacco e cosi’, a differenza della scimmietta Belfagor nel cadere ,che tacchi non possedeva, il Gigante Gradasso avendone si fece più male……….

    Morale

    In una disputa ingiusta ai danni di una scimmietta incatenata ,che male non ha mai fatto a nessuno ,
    il tiranno Gigante Gradasso farà i conti con la sua superbia, in quanto, lui essendo molto alto per via dei tacchi dello Stivale che porta e dall’autorità che rappresenta come Gigante
    Avrà sottolineato quanto molto di piu’ avrà da perdere
    Essendo Gigante …… rispetto alla Scimmietta …… eh eh eh FY

    Lola Marini Pediamic LBM






























    ReplyDelete



























  31. LA GIUSTIZIA SECONDO I BAMBINI

    FIABA CON MORALE



    C’era una volta una bambina, che imparando a leggere per caso, un giorno , si confronto’ con le notizie di un giornale.
    L’articolo, riportava notizie di un incidente d’auto, avvenuto ai danni delle forze dell’ordine , si diceva che i conducenti ed i passeggeri (tutti delle forze dell’ordine ) erano rimasti illesi.

    Cosi’ , tutto di un tratto , mentre leggeva in classe, davanti ai suoi compagni di scuola , la bambina scoppio’ a piangere ed il suo maestro nel vedere le sue lacrime le chiese come mai si disperava tanto.

    E la bambina rispose, non è giusto , non è giusto, e, singhiozzando disse , ma neanche una sgranfinniata ????? nemmeno nemmeno una botticina ???????

    Si scopri poi che le forze dell’ordine le avevano arrestato un parente per errore volutamente giudiziario………

    E nessuno le aveva mai chiesto scusa per l’accaduto.

    Morale

    Non ve ne………… , tranne quella dell’innocenza dei bambini ad esporre i fatti.

    Il parente si chiamava ( Giustizia )

    Lola Marini Pediamic LBM

    ReplyDelete