Monday, January 17, 2011

Anchor Babies: What is This All About?



Should Breaking Immigration Law Be Rewarded?


Of course it should not, but the present law is that if two foreigners come here on vacation or illegally and bear a child, the child automatically gains American citizenship. It is claimed that the 14th Amendment says anyone born in this country (except to foreign diplomats) is a citizen of the United States and the state where they live regardless of the legality of the parents. Foreign diplomats are here legally. Why would their legal presence prohibit their children born here from being citizens and the children born to those in the country illegaly automatically get blessed with citizenship? It is absurd, but what is absurd the law as executed or the law as written?


Tha actual language in Section 1:


Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. At common law, every person born within the realm of the British Crown was a British subject. This meant that to be a British subject, one simply had to be born in any territory under the sovereignty of the British Crown. The only exception at common law was that the children of foreign ambassadors, but that defined subjugation and not citizenship.


More background

159 comments:

  1. Civics Test

    I'll warn you; it isn't easy. I even missed a couple (damned anti-Federalists.)

    But, it's short. - 33 questions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. University Educators averaged 55%. Average Citizens 49%. Politicians 44%. Whatta surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is this all about?

    More Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You answered 29 out of 33 correctly — 87.88 %

    Missed questions:

    Answers to Your Missed Questions:

    Question #10 - C. Religion
    Question #14 - B. stressed the sinfulness of all humanity
    Question #29 - B. a resident can benefit from it without directly paying for it
    Question #33 - D. tax per person equals government spending per person

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't care about religion but I am shocked, shocked that I got # 33 wrong. I must have been distracted.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I missed #33, also. I put down "debt would be zero." I still don't see how I wuz wrong.

    I, also, missed #11. Didn't have a clue.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are you more knowledgeable than the average citizen? The average score for all 2,508 Americans taking the following test was 49%; college educators scored 55%. Can you do better? Questions were drawn from past ISI surveys, as well as other nationally recognized exams.

    I knew we have become a nation of fat assed dumb shits. Nothing like having your prejudices confirmed over coffee.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Politicians got 44%. Now, you tell me . . . . . .


    I was going to finish with "dumbest people in the world," but had to stop. I mean, hell, We Elected the Ignorant Assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That quiz should be given to potential voters. If you can't pass 50% go home.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think I read somewhere that the literacy rate in the 1600's was something like 97%, with a large percentage being able to read both Latin, and Greek.

    We've come a long way, baby.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Swat those two flies while you're over there, will ya, Deuce?

    ReplyDelete
  12. 64%
    Not particularly proud of the score, but absolutely hate, HATE multiple choice tests.

    Maybe I should have taken a Ridlyn pill first. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Look at it this way, GR: You beat the College Perfessors, and whupped the politicians by 50%.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "I am neither fat nor skinny. I exist in your mind in whatever form you give me."

    Well, then.

    Morbidly obese it is.



    Bathos?

    Blow it out your ass.

    Some people have real lives to contend with. Real lives in which havoc has been wrecked with gleeful disregard (or worse).

    You do not deserve to admonish or lecture me.

    And you can wipe that smile right off your face.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. .

    Trish, no lecturing. No admonishing. Just some advice.

    Go sit your dad down and have a discussion with him about what is bothering you. Then have the same discussion with your husband and kids.

    Sitting here blaming all your problems on us is silly and unproductive.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  17. How's the Bar's Hunter Thompson doing today?

    Aren't you supposed to be in limbo, you giggling idiot?



    Anchor babies.

    I say we need more of 'em.

    Hell, throw open citizenship to all comers.

    Expand the tax base.

    And what's good for the Democrats is good for the country.

    The Republican Party is rotten to its very core.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I knew you'd have a response to that, Quirk.

    Now shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Republican Party is rotten to its very core.

    And one need look no further for evidence of this than John McCain's one time running mate.

    Obama's an "empty suit"?

    I'll take the "empty suit" over the empty head. I'd take an ACTUAL Marxist over that.

    For God's sake, the woman is a moron.

    It's downright frightening that she's the political attraction that she is.



    Babble loves her.

    Don't you, babble?

    I can easily imagine you dressing up as Sarahbaby and traipsing around the condo.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Where's Melody?

    Bring back the fucking gorillas, I say!

    ReplyDelete
  22. "My wife is very very smart."

    Apparently not.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Trish, can you point me to one (just one) specific instance of Sarahbaby being a moron?

    Let me rephrase that. Will you?

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Will you?"

    What's in it for me?

    I'm sorry you like her. I'm sorry you and millions of others think she's presidential material. I really am.

    She's a fucking goofball.

    ReplyDelete
  25. That she has actual elitists, true establishment types, drooling all over her - look, she's authentic! - is too, too funny.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I mean, I read what she writes; and I can find nothing moronic in any of it. I listen to what she says, and it comes across as very sensible.

    I posted in the last thread an interview she gave to a Jewish organization in which she came across as extremely knowledgeable regarding the whole settlements/West Bank issue.

    I'd just like to know what I'm missing.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sarah Palin is legally qualified to be president. Therein lies the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sarah Palin winning the primary and running against Obama is has got to be the DNC's wet dream.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Rufus,

    gosh ain't Sarah to die for? Reads a script as good as anyone!

    Who'd you like to have a beer with? A bottle of wine or two?

    Presidential timber, aye!

    ReplyDelete
  30. The video she put up Wednesday, in which, evidently, she was the writer, director, and chief bottle washer was extremely well-done.

    I just wish I had the talent to write such a well-reasoned, and Inspirational, response in the middle of the firestorm she was going through (or, truthfully, Anytime.)

    I haven't read it, but from everything I've heard, her second book (which she evidently wrote entirely, or almost entirely, herself) is an Excellent piece of writing.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "I posted in the last thread an interview she gave to a Jewish organization in which she came across as..."

    Holy Warrior Mother.

    Just what we need.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Palin cannot win. Look at Obama's numbers. He is back to 50%. Palin will bring his numbers up, re-elect Obama and the Dems will keep the Senate and probably neuter the house.

    ReplyDelete
  33. People that don't like her keep telling me she's an idiot, but no one shows me any evidence of it.

    Everything my lying eyes can see informs me that she is a shrewd, hard-working, perfect-pitch politician.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Palin 2012

    The World Is Ending Anyway

    ReplyDelete
  35. "Palin cannot win. Look at Obama's numbers. He is back to 50%. Palin will bring his numbers up, re-elect Obama and the Dems will keep the Senate and probably neuter the house."

    Roger.

    ReplyDelete
  36. If the price of gas stabilizes, or even, praise jeebus, trends down, and the economy does well, no living human being will be able to beat Obama.

    But, if the price of gas is high, and the economy stumbles even more my pecker would be able to unseat the punk.

    I think gas prices will be up, or we'll be back in recession, But

    you pays your money, and you takes your chances.

    ReplyDelete
  37. "Everything my lying eyes can see informs me that she is a shrewd, hard-working, perfect-pitch politician."

    Well, there ya go.

    Get your vision checked, hillbilly.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Besides, I'd just as soon Obama gets reelected as one of the standard Republicans. He's right on more issues than they are.

    I'd like to vote for Palin because I think she's special,

    and she'd drive the establishment crazy.

    And, she's got Great legs.

    ReplyDelete
  39. If the price of gas keeps going up and we dive back into recession, how does this help Sarah?

    The GOP? Possible.

    But Caribou Barbie?

    I think not.


    People would be looking for another technocrat. Like Mittens.

    Who I think I could tolerate just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  40. We'll have to wait for the swimsuit segment of the competition to find out.

    ReplyDelete
  41. She's got a "history" in the Oil Patch. She put a bunch of the good ol' boys in Alaska in jail over corruption in the oil and gas bidness.

    She was dancing around on-stage two years ago chanting "drill here, drill now." She'll be in perfect position.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I posted in the last thread an interview she gave to a Jewish organization in which she came across as extremely knowledgeable regarding the whole settlements/West Bank issue.

    She has a tin ear and is not a smart politician. Obama got 77% of the Jewish vote. Jews usually go in the mid 60's for Democrats. Jews make up 6% of the US population and they live in heavily Democratic areas where Republicans hardly have a chance anyway under the best of circumstances.

    Obama got 96% of the black vote. The Latin American vote will go overwhelmingly for Obama.

    34% of whites do not vote at all. If Palin has a chance, she needs to drive white voters above 70%.

    What are the chances? Slim to none.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Mittens is okay. I supported him in the last election primaries.

    I would vote for him (but, it's not like I'd be gigglin', an' grabbin ass on the way in the door.)

    ReplyDelete
  44. I understand that that interview won't translate into anything special in the way of votes. I just used it as an example of an interest group that was surprised at how well informed she was on their particular agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I've never voted.

    Well, I think I might have voted in student council elections back in junior high.

    That's about it.

    I've supported this politician or that at various times.

    I just feel no need to vote.

    Rather, I feel a need NOT to.

    ReplyDelete
  46. If Huckabee runs he, almost assuredly, wins Iowa. Mittens, then, would probably win NH, and Sarah would have an Awfully hard row to hoe.

    If the Schmuck doesn't run the dynamic changes, big-time. Sarah could, quite likely, win the nomination.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Well then, Trish, your license to bitch has, herewith, been revoked.

    ReplyDelete
  48. And if you'd like to disengage from the Middle East, Sarah does not strike me as an obvious choice.

    Not that it's going to happen any time soon under any administration.

    We could all be living solar-powered lives and riding bikes to work and we'd still have a keen interest in that part of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  49. "Well then, Trish, your license to bitch has, herewith, been revoked."

    The day I die, hillbilly.

    The day I die.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I would imagine that Mideast/S. Asia policy will be almost identical under Mittens, Sarababy, or the Won.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Well then, my obligation to Listen has been abrogated. :)

    ReplyDelete
  52. Deuce said... Palin cannot win





    I wouldn't get complacent. I certainly think she could win but there is no way I think that would be a good thing.

    Here in Toronto people said that about a buffoon of a City Councillor that has been railing at the moon for years but, guess what, he won.

    Heck, the USA elected GW Bush not once, but TWICE and 'have the beer with' litmus test runs strong in flyover country.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Everything I've seen Palin do of late has been scripted - EVERYTHING. If she keeps that up...

    ...look out.

    ReplyDelete
  54. The Gods conspired to get Obumbles Into office, they could conspire to get him out.

    A lotta stuff could happen in the next two years.

    ReplyDelete
  55. "Well then, my obligation to Listen has been abrogated. :)"

    Oh, you'll listen.

    You don't have anything better to do.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Her statement the other day was very well done, And it polled well.

    She suffered from an extremely poor "staff" during the last run. That won't happen this time.

    ReplyDelete
  57. "You don't have anything better to do."


    Shit! You didn't hafta go all Roman on me.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  58. "Everything I've seen Palin do of late has been scripted - EVERYTHING. If she keeps that up..."

    So what?

    I don't have a problem with shit being scripted.

    She's still a dolt and a deeply divisive figure.

    And just what the Dems ordered.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Frightening but fruitful for the Democratic Party.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I can't think of a single national league politician I'd care to have a beer with.

    Does anyone really imagine that that kind of conversation is terribly interesting?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Now, you say she's a "dolt."

    But, you still haven't put up an example of her being


    moronic,

    doltish,

    ill-informed,

    uninquisitive,

    illiterate,


    whatever.


    Do you have Anything?

    ReplyDelete
  62. "Do you have Anything?"

    Go back to writing her script, rufus.

    Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  63. She's the contender I'd most like to go camping with. :)

    ReplyDelete
  64. Here's the thing:

    She's the only National Politician (besides Chuck Schumer) that I can see looking into Hu Jintao's eyes, and saying,

    "We really don't Have to buy that junk from you'all, you know?"

    ReplyDelete
  65. Just, please, don't write mine.

    ReplyDelete
  66. But we do have to buy that junk, from someone cheaper than ourselves.

    Otherwise, no Wal Mart. No Target. No Best Buy. No affordable consumables for most.

    ReplyDelete
  67. I can see her pointing to the Weatherby on the Oval Office wall, and asking Putin, "Do you hunt?"

    ReplyDelete
  68. She's the contender I'd most like to go camping with. :)

    - rufus

    Dick.

    ReplyDelete
  69. trishh:

    "So what?

    I don't have a problem with shit being scripted.

    She's still a dolt "

    Things is, if she remains on script she can keep her "dolt"-ness obscured. They said that about Bush, being a dolt and all, but on excuse made was 'he's got good advisers'. Unfortunately he was the "decider".

    ReplyDelete
  70. Nah, Trish, before the last boat from China docked, Walmart would have stuff being made in Vietnam, Cambodia, Colombia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and West Wasilla.

    You'd never know what happened.

    ReplyDelete
  71. I missed three questions:
    Of course, the tricky thirty-three. I also missed the electoral college one. I knew better but I screwed up on that one.

    Can't remember the third one.

    Re: anchor babies, we covered that here a while back so anything I add will only be repetitious. Read Ann Coulter's column on Justice Brennan's 1982 footnote.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I voted for McCain/Palin because I could not bring myself to vote for Nobama. If I had to do it over again, I would do the same thing.

    Palin is not electable, and I don't think many people think she is electable, not even herself.

    She is having great fun making the leftists wet their panties, with all the attention she is getting.

    If she does run for President, it will be early and she will be talked out of it before the primaries.

    Most of the folks who bash her and call her names are scared of her. You know who you are.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Nah, Trish, before the last boat from China docked, Walmart would have stuff being made in Vietnam, Cambodia, Colombia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and West Wasilla.

    You'd never know what happened.

    - rufus

    Like I said, somebody cheaper than ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  74. "Palin is scripted."

    And Obama can't speak to a kindergarten class without teleprompters.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Besides, as wages increase in China, manufacturers go looking for even greener pastures.

    ReplyDelete
  76. They said Reagan was a dolt. An amiable dunce. Then, after he left office, a lot of his private letters were released. Guess what. He wuzn't no dunce.

    Oh, and he cut the Russians' nuts off.

    And, his crazy starwars? Now, the Pres doen't ask, "where are my carriers;" it's, "will the missile defense cover that?"

    Yep. Dunce.

    ReplyDelete
  77. "Most of the folks who bash her and call her names are scared of her."

    Be.Cause. She's. Scary.

    I'm sure there have been male versions of her.

    (There's your homework.)

    Just without the same scare quotient.

    ReplyDelete
  78. The very author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob Howard of Michigan, expressly said: "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers."


    Would have been kinda nice if he could have bothered to put that part in writing, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Everyone here is kicking the politicians, and college perfessers' asses.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Don't need to do any homework, baby sister, the one in office now is SCARY.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Reagan wasn't a dolt. He had his genuine intellectual side.

    A lot of people reacted badly to his affability, which apparently was also genuine. I don't know why. I guess they took it for shallowness.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I shudder when I think of Algore being one heartbeat away from the Presidency. I console myself with the thought that if this country survived Jimmy Carter, it can survive anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  83. And, of course, the number one answer is, "She's Interesting."





    and, has great legs.

    ReplyDelete
  84. It would be better to buy cheaper stuff from countries that are not 5x your size and vicious competitors, preferably countries that share your ideology in some manner and do not have the capability or the incentive to blow your satellites out of the sky and your aircraft carriers out of the water.

    ReplyDelete
  85. A lot of people reacted badly to his politics, too.

    Lest it go without saying.

    ReplyDelete
  86. That's right, Whit. The man was "The Goofball's Goofball."

    And, you know what, I was gobsmacked to go back and look at the "Real Growth" numbers. They were as good as anybody's.

    Just shows to go ya.

    ReplyDelete
  87. "...preferably countries that share your ideology in some manner and do not have the capability or the incentive to blow your satellites out of the sky and your aircraft carriers out of the water."

    Well said.

    Speaking of which, when's the FTA with Colombia going to pass?

    At this point, I'm not sure that even an entirely Republican Congress would be motivated to do it.

    I've given up.

    ReplyDelete
  88. And, The "Winner" is:

    It would be better to buy cheaper stuff from countries that are not 5x your size and vicious competitors, preferably countries that share your ideology in some manner and do not have the capability or the incentive to blow your satellites out of the sky and your aircraft carriers out of the water.


    They be too big to mess around with.

    ReplyDelete
  89. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  90. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  91. West Wasilla?

    Lookit, I have to live in the real world.

    You know, the one out here...

    ReplyDelete
  92. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  93. "...look what we've got now for Christ sakes."

    Spectacularly successful Democratic president.

    Also helps to have a Democratic Congress.

    But one cannot say that insofar as his agenda goes, he's been a failure.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Just checking you out, Trish. Seein' if you were readin'.

    ReplyDelete
  95. "She is a force of nature."

    So are other bad things, like tornadoes and hurricanes and floods. And locusts.

    ReplyDelete
  96. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  97. No, Trish. We have a dumbfuck, dem president that thought it would be a good idea to humiliate the Justices of the Supreme Court on national tv at the State of the Union Address,

    and is now going to have his signature achievement declared "Unconstitutional" by those same Robed Rambos.

    About what you would expect from the punk that gave Hillary Clinton the finger during a presidential debate.

    ReplyDelete
  98. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Did he really?

    Awesome.



    But you know, I've warmed to her.

    A really good SecState.

    ReplyDelete
  100. whit said... "Palin is scripted."

    And Obama can't speak to a kindergarten class without teleprompters.


    All politicians are scripted. I've seen Obama speak extemporaneously and he's obviously a thoughtful man. What I've seen of Palin speaking extemporaneously has not been impressive.

    Regardless of whether she is a dolt or not it is her policies that are problemataic (if you can call them that).

    ReplyDelete
  101. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  102. She used to be fingernails on a chalkboard for me.

    Quite the evolution.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Like I said, you know who you are.

    ReplyDelete
  104. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  105. "...don't create a HOME in Wasilla, Alaska."

    Gee, that's super.

    Does that mean you are especially suited for the Oval Office?

    I mean, have we been completely wrong in our collective criteria, such as it is?

    No one who likes Shakespeare, even an unmedicated, malicious, giggling idiot like yourself who wouldn't seem to have two brain cells to rub together for the task, has any business supporting that woman for any office whatsoever.

    Outside of West Wasilla.

    ReplyDelete
  106. In Los Angeles most people would prefer to do just about anything else but care.
    The turnout for the race was a shockingly low 15%

    ---

    Los Angeles, the second-largest city in the U.S., recently held a mayoral election. If LA was anything like Chicago or New York, the fight for the mayor's office would likely have been fodder for local newspapers, radio and tv.

    But in Los Angeles most people would prefer to do just about anything else but care. The turnout for the race was a shockingly low 15% (so low, that we had to doublecheck that it wasn't a typo). It didn't even make front page of the LA Times on election day. But the paper still ran an analysis deriding the pitiful turnout. The editorial also had this shocking quote, "Voter turnout was low, but not bottom-scraping." Which makes us wonder just what a 'bottom-scraping' turnout would look like.

    Read more: HERE

    By not voting, the citizens of LA end up getting a corrupt, racist, ex gang member Mayor for a second term.

    No doubt the interest and turnout in BELL CA and several other now bankrupt communities was also low.

    5,000 people elect city councilmen in the second largest city.

    A completely corrupt council is the result.

    We'll be seeing more about California's miserys soon enough, whether Rufus predicts it or not.

    ReplyDelete
  107. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  108. I'll chime in on Rufus's supposedly Green and Wonderful LA Dept of Water and (coal fired) Power one of these days.

    The mayor, the council, and the LADWP put the small time crooks in Bell to shame.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Here rufus

    problem solved!



    Neil Reynolds

    A brave new world of fossil fuels on demand

    In September, a privately held and highly secretive U.S. biotech company named Joule Unlimited received a patent for “a proprietary organism” – a genetically adapted E. coli bacterium – that feeds solely on carbon dioxide and excretes liquid hydrocarbons: diesel fuel, jet fuel and gasoline.


    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/a-brave-new-world-of-fossil-fuels-on-demand/article1871149/

    ReplyDelete
  110. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  111. "You are changing your mind..."

    Bob. She changed.

    She went from being one of the most obnoxiously confrontational, combatively defensive, hyper-partisan women in politics to...

    ...someone who could do a job relatively quietly and competently, without the worst kind of self-seeking and drama.

    ReplyDelete
  112. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Of course you do. Bob.

    But look. It's time for a nap.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Prince of Darkness?

    That I can see.

    ReplyDelete
  115. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Just remember:

    I didn't vote for you.

    ReplyDelete
  117. How much for a good exorcist?

    ReplyDelete
  118. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  119. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Lap up the propaganda, you MSM trolls!

    Defeat is certain when surrender is the course of choice.

    Be sophisticated, aid the Dems in destroying the country!


    AP Erroneously Reports that 'Opposition' to Obamacare is Easing

    A widely reprinted AP story, based on a recent AP/GfK poll, is entitled,

    "Opposition to health care law eases." Don't believe it.

    What has eased isn't the level of opposition to Obamacare, but rather the level of effort that AP/GfK has made to ensure that its polling sample is representative of American voters.
    When the AP/GfK poll screened for likely voters a couple of weeks before the election, it estimated that 48 percent of voters leaned Republican and that 42 percent leaned Democratic (which the election showed to be about right). In its latest survey -- the one that serves as the basis for the AP story -- AP/GfK didn't screen for likely voters and didn't screen for registered voters. Instead, it merely surveyed 1,001 adults. The result? The percentage of Democratic-leaning respondents stayed the same (42 percent), but the percentage of Republican-leaning respondents dropped by 12 points, to 36 percent.
    As one would expect -- with the same percentage of Democratic-leaning respondents having been surveyed both times -- the level of support for Obamacare remained essentially unchanged: 41 percent supported it previously; 40 percent support it now. Just as unsurprisingly, when the percentage of Republican-leaning respondents dropped by 12 points, the level of opposition to Obamacare dropped by 11 points (from 52 to 41 percent).

    Moreover, despite its gross under-representation of Republican-leaning respondents, the current AP/GfK poll still shows more people opposing Obamacare than supporting it, even greater opposition among those who feel strongly, overwhelming opposition to the individual mandate, and more support for repealing Obamacare in its entirety than for keeping Obamacare as it is.

    There's no story here, even though AP wrote one.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Goldman Limits Facebook Investment to Foreign Clients
    By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

    Daniel Acker/Bloomberg News1:43 p.m. | Updated Just over a week after Goldman Sachs offered its most prized clients a chance to invest in Facebook, the firm rescinded the opportunity from clients in the United States because of worries that the deal would run afoul of securities regulators.



    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/goldman-limits-facebook-investment-to-foreign-clients/?hp

    ReplyDelete
  122. .

    All politicians are scripted. I've seen Obama speak extemporaneously and he's obviously a thoughtful man. What I've seen of Palin speaking extemporaneously has not been impressive.

    Impressions are important Ash. That's all most people have time for these days.

    Bloopers, misspeaks, and gaffes, not so much except as political tools to poke fun at a candidate.

    The extemporaneaous Obama

    Obama Misspeaks

    There's plenty more.

    The question becomes so what. You can find the same types of videos on most of the presidents. Does anyone actually believe Obama doesn't know how many states there are?

    It comes down to impressions though. Some people get their impressions through these soundbites.

    My opinion of Palin is that she is clever, ambitious, opportunistic, and attractive (to many if not to me). She quit the governorship to make money and she has done a masterful job of the latter. She tapped into the current mood in this country and has exploited it to her advantage.

    Again my opinion, but I don't think she had any plans to run for further political office. However, the media has pumped her up to the point she is starting to belive her own press releases.

    She has a solid base that will support her. In a multi-candidate field with no superstars she could conceivably get the nomination. I think were that the case she woul lose badly in the general election.

    I think she lacks the experiance for president (or vice president).
    If she were interested in that positon, she should currently be running for Congress or the Senate.

    Palin is all hat and no cattle, all boots and no saddle.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  123. .

    The last line of my last post reminds me of this song


    Cow Patty

    .

    ReplyDelete
  124. You answered 31 out of 33 correctly — 93.94 %

    One of my answers was wrong because I accidentally clicked the wrong circle. Lack of caffeine?

    31) International trade and specialization most often lead to which of the following?
    A. an increase in a nation’s productivity
    [Aimed here]
    B. a decrease in a nation’s economic growth in the long term [X'ed by a slip]
    C. an increase in a nation’s import tariffs
    D. a decrease in a nation’s standard of living


    Missed 11) also. Need to read the Federalist Papers, or something.

    Can I have a donut?

    ReplyDelete
  125. I still don't see how I wuz wrong.

    Prior debt.

    ReplyDelete
  126. I see Trish has sobered up.

    Yes, hon, I am smiling. How'd you guess?

    ReplyDelete
  127. Do you get to be Hunter Thompson today, Q?

    I'd wear that as a badge of honor, but only if the source was sober.

    ReplyDelete
  128. 84.85%


    Not bad for a whore with not thought in her head, eh?

    five questions wrong with four questions guessed in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
  129. I still don't like the wording on 33. If they'd said, "Average" person's taxes, and "Average" person's spending I might have thought twice about my answer.


    As for 11, I was clueless.

    ReplyDelete
  130. Quirk

    After your 15 minute good bye speech you have been around more than I thought.

    So, I'm assuming you are still doing the last two horoscopes.

    ReplyDelete
  131. I think you've been "sandbagging" us, Melody. :)


    Pretty good scores for the ol' EB. Not bad for a honky-tonk.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I guess I pay attention more than I thought.

    ReplyDelete
  133. I make the EB Average 85.92 so far.

    That's about 30 points higher than the average University Edycator, and about 42 points higher than the politicraps. Basically, double the score of the professional polithieves.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Nap time, defending Palin is hard work.

    ReplyDelete
  135. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  136. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I got them all right.



    And Sarah has fat ankles.




    I have never read Hunter Thompson.

    There was an old-school Marxist, Vietnamese I believe, rabidly anti-American, at another website who positively declared Thompson THE American writer.

    Hunter Thompson IS America. Or was. In his estimation.

    Didn't do anything to inspire me to read him.

    ReplyDelete
  138. "Yes, hon, I am smiling. How'd you guess?"

    You're always smiling. And I have a feeling you know just how much it bothers me.

    ReplyDelete
  139. Well. He certainly had a very high opinion of himself.

    Or a low one of journalists.

    But I have a distinct feeling more of the former.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Speaking of that website with the old school Marxist, the last time I was there was right after the hostage rescue in Colombia.

    I was kind of poking him in the eye with it.

    "Just you wait and see what comes out in the news about it next week," he said.

    Who the fuck ARE you? I wondered.

    Nothing came out in the news. The whole thing had been damm near perfect.

    The only internet persona I've ever encountered whose mind is more riddled with conspiracy than Rat. And that's saying something.

    ReplyDelete
  141. Of course, it IS all a conspiracy.

    Just not of any sort I ever would have imagined.

    ReplyDelete
  142. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  143. "I'm banned."

    Doesn't look like it to me.

    ReplyDelete
  144. Question #7 - D. Gettysburg Address

    Which I shoulda got

    33, which shouldn't count!

    ReplyDelete