In Cycles the Climate Rhetoric Heats Up

Bali – The Brainwashing

Mr. Ban Ki Moon, the hitherto little known UN bureaucrat and recently elected Secretary General of the United Nations has issued a warning and laid the foundation for future events:
According to AP:

Guidelines on greenhouse gas emissions cuts opposed by the United States may be "too ambitious" to include in a final statement from the climate conference in Bali, the U.N. chief said Wednesday.
Drafts of the conference statement obtained by The Associated Press have included a call for industrialized countries to reduce emissions blamed for global warming by between 25 percent and 40 percent by 2020.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, however, said such goals might have to wait for subsequent negotiations, though he added that at some point targets for emissions cuts would be necessary.
"Realistically, it may be too ambitious" to set guidelines now, Ban told reporters, when asked about steadfast opposition by the United States, though he urged Washington to be flexible.
Later he added, "Practically speaking, this will have to be negotiated down the road."

Reducing green house gas emissions by 25 to 40 percent in the next 12 years? What are the chances of that happening? Given the track record of the Kyoto signatories, not bloody likely. A BBC article pointed out the nations which first signed to Kyoto 10 years ago have not met their CO2 reduction goals.

Japan - a signatory to Kyoto - should have cut by 6% but it has increased emissions by 7%. Italy (+7.4%) and Spain (+59.8%) are missing their targets by a mile.
In the UK, carbon emissions have recently been going up despite all the government's green rhetoric.

Two governmental henny-pennies are issuing catastrophic warnings:

Now, science advisors to two governments with claims to leadership in global climate politics, Germany and the UK, have told BBC News it is unlikely that levels of greenhouse gases can be kept low enough to avoid a projected temperature rise of 2C (3.6F).
Professors Sir David King and John Schellnhuber say the world is more than 50% likely to experience dangerous levels of climate change.
They believe politicians have been too slow to cut emissions.
Current science suggests that above 2C, billions of people will face water shortages, the world's food supplies could be threatened and widespread extinction could be triggered.
Neither scientist believes that the world would achieve the goal of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of stabilising emissions by around 2015.
It all means that since the world committed to avoid dangerous climate change, emissions globally are up around 22%, the highest levels of CO2 since dinosaurs roamed a sweltering earth.

The Guardian UK also reported the doom and gloom urgency of the Secretary General’s warning:

The time to act on climate change is now, the UN secretary general today warned delegates gathered in Bali to negotiate a new global deal on climate change.
As talks intensify during the crucial top-level section of the climate change conference which begins today, Ban Ki-moon urged ministers and heads of state to reach an agreement for the sake of future generations.
Calling climate change the "moral challenge of our generation", he said: "Succeeding generations depend on us. We cannot rob our children of their future."
"As we convene here in Bali, the eyes of the world are upon us - this is a historic moment long in the making.
"The science is clear, climate change is happening, the impact is real, the time to act is now," he warned, adding that price of inaction - including floods, famine, rising sea levels and loss of biodiversity - would be far higher than the costs of taking action.
"Climate change is as much an opportunity as it is a threat. It is our chance to usher in a new age of green economics and truly sustainable development."

It's time to chill-out with the hot rhetoric. Look at the words being used to incite action:

Floods, famine, extinction.
Sweltering temperatures,

Moral challenge.

In order to save the planet, an English woman has had herself sterilized and an Australian obstetrician/professor, Dr. Barry Walters, has proposed a one-time tax of $5000 (Australian) on babies born into families which already have two children. It doesn't stop there, he says another $800 per year would be in order to, as he put it, "counterbalance the carbon debt." He says he "rejoices in every baby" his patients have but I wonder if he has considered how many will be aborted if ideas such as his are implemented?

A generation of young people are being indoctrinated with this kind of language and thought. It’s only a matter of time before some brain-washed fanatics take it upon themselves to do in the “bastards who are killing mother earth.” After all, it's the moral thing to do.