Monday, May 07, 2007

The nonsense of cultural moral equivalency.



The Myth of Moral Equivalence
billmuehlenberg.com

When the Cold War was at its height, there was a corresponding ideological war taking place: a war of ideas. Those on the radical left tried to convince us that there really was no difference between a free and democratic West, and totalitarian Communism. I remember debating many of these lefties back in the 80s.

They were convinced that the US and Ronald Reagan were morally just as bad as the Soviet Union and their dictators. Of course many were even convinced of the superiority of communism. But those who tried to argue that the two political systems were on a par were engaging in both sloppy thinking and mushy moralising.

What they were promoting came to be known as the doctrine of Moral Equivalence. They tried to argue that there was a moral equivalence between totalitarian regimes and democratic nations. Of course more sober minds knew better, and the collapse of the Berlin Wall helped to demolish the myth of Moral Equivalence.

The truth is, no one was trying to make their way into East Germany or into the communist world. But millions of people were desperately trying to flee the chains of communist tyranny, even at the risk of their own lives. They were voting with their feet. They knew far better than the Western armchair intellectuals and ideologues that there was no moral equivalence between the two systems. Freedom and dictatorship have nothing in common.

Thus there was only one-way traffic during the Cold War: people seeking to escape Communist dictatorships. That fact alone should have put an end to the myth of Moral Equivalence.

Unfortunately, however, the ME myth is still with us, even after the end of the Cold War. You see, there is still plenty of foolish thinking and moral myopia around these days, and there is also plenty of Anti-Americanism. So the myth of Moral Equivalence has resurfaced, this time in the context of the war on terror.

There are now plenty of Western leftists seeking to argue that America is just as much a terrorist state as are such groups as Al Qaeda. We in the West are just as guilty as the suicide bombers, they try to convince us. American foreign policy in the Middle East, we are told, is no better than the attacks of 9/11.

Indeed, for many leftists, America and the West are not just morally equivalent to the terrorists, but in many cases are in fact worse. Thus we have the same old ideological disconnect with reality coming from those on the far left.

And of course it is not just secular left-wingers who make these foolish claims. Some religious leftists also try to make them. Because they seem incapable of distinguishing between legitimate taking of life and murder, they see all uses of force as identical. Thus in their jaundiced eyes, national self-defence is seen as just as reprehensible as a suicide bombing. But on these issues, I have written elsewhere.

Chuck Colson had an informative opinion piece in yesterday’s Breakpoint, highlighting some of these differences. He begins, “What difference does a worldview make? Around the world, we are seeing the clash of civilizations in action. In recent days, that clash has given us a story of life, and stories of death. In Baghdad yesterday, a terrorist blew himself up with a car bomb, killing at least twenty-eight people and wounding dozens more. One witness told the Associated Press that pieces of human flesh were scattered all around the marketplace.”

He goes on to recount other stories of Islamist slaughter. “In all three cases,” he says, “Muslims blew up Muslims. The response of Europe and the Muslim world to the stories of death? Outrage? No. Silence. Did the Western press condemn them? No.”

But contrast this with another story as reported by one American television network: “NBC has been running a gripping series on the emergency military triage facilities in Iraq. Last Thursday, NBC showed wounded Iraqi insurgents being brought to Camp Speicher near Tikrit. Two of them had been caught placing an explosive device on a nearby road, intending to kill Americans, when a U.S. helicopter opened fire on them. The U.S. medical team moved heaven and earth to save their lives. One insurgent, however, was not going to survive unless he got thirty pints of blood.”

“But the base was low on blood. The call went out for volunteer donors; minutes later, dozens of G.I.s had lined up. At the head of the line was a battle-hardened soldier named Brian Suam. Asked if it mattered that his blood was going to an insurgent, he smiled and said, no – ‘A human life is a human life’.”

He continues, “I have never seen a more dramatic example of worldviews in contrast, nor have I been prouder of an American G.I. On one hand, we have the horrors of a civilization that values death - even the death of its own children - if by killing them they can hurt the infidels. On the other side, we have a story that makes us realize just how deeply embedded within American life is our Judeo-Christian heritage. This heritage teaches that human life is sacred - even the life of an enemy who falls into our hands.”

Who says all worldviews are equal? “These stories make nonsense of the claim that there is no real difference between Christianity and Islam. The clash of civilizations is not only about a fundamental difference between ways of viewing God, reality, life, and life’s meaning; it’s also about good versus evil, life versus death.”

Of course such stories will not sway some of the hardened ideologues and members of the ‘America is always wrong’ crowd. But for those with more balanced moral outlooks, they will help to demonstrate that all cultures are not equal, all worldviews are not the same, and all religions to not lead to identical outcomes.

Concludes Colson, “Of course, this doesn’t apply to peace-loving Muslims, but to the radicals now surging in the Arab world. It’s time for the West to wake up. As Thomas Friedman of the New York Times put it last week, there is no accepted source of Arab-Muslim authority today for peace-loving Muslims ‘to anchor their souls in.’ We need, Friedman writes, ‘a counter-terrorism strategy that delegitimizes suicide bombers.’ But that will happen only when Muslim leaders condemn violence. Friedman is right. We ignore the horrors of radical Islam to our peril. If we do nothing, in time, the stories of life will be overwhelmed by the stories of death.”

Moral equivalence, in other words, in an age of terrorism, is a silly and harmful doctrine that needs to be abandoned as soon as possible. Ideology must give way to reality, or we will all be facing much worse to come.

http://www.breakpoint.org/listingarticle.asp?ID=6236


28 comments:

  1. I read all your comments. I hate you all. Now you will know why it is said: "be careful what you wish for, lest it come true."

    Thanks again for all your kind words and the expression on how much the continuation of the EB is to you all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Deuce,

    We expect hand drawn originals from now on. No more plagiarized PS knokoffs. :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. btw,

    'merica vs ishmael? who is which? when do we get to first base?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is almost always a sure fire way to figure what the real deal is, to watch which way the tennis shoes are running, or trying to run.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is it just me? It feels like the rest of the world (the good part, anyway) is starting to "Sober Up."

    Oh, Great Post, Deuce.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maybe the French election is a real turning point, Rufus.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Canada, Australia, Germany, Sweden, France - It does feel like the World's waking up, Bob. At least, an important part of it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I took a quick glance at a WSJ today--Chevron, or was it Exxon, has some huge project going with the Russians on Sakhalin Island. Sounded really impressive, the technology they used.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bob, the Russkies took most of that away from the Americans, I believe. Just like Chavez is doing in Venezuela.

    It's okay; every time they screw us around we move just a little bit closer to energy independence.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is amazing what they can do. I think I read the other day that someone said they could drill down 7 miles if the mood struck'em.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Romney's on top in NH, now. I think he's just sharp enough to get our little jalopy back out of the ditch, and onto the asphalt.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wouldn't expect too much out of Sarkozy, anymore than I expect it out of Merkel.

    Hostile political and intellectual climates for real reform. Baby steps is the best that is going to happen, and even that is easily reversible.

    That's for internal reform - actually helping us is even more unlikely. We're radioactive insofar as Europe is concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Australia's been awake since day 1.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You're right, Sam. They didn't really belong on that list, I suppose. They did let the libs take their guns away, though.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Sending people home like animals is wrong. People in Africa don't like him because of that. Every African has a friend or relative in Europe," said computer engineer Moussa Tonde, waiting at the French embassy in Ivory Coast to seek a visa.

    Sarkozy made a "brotherly appeal" to Africa in his victory speech. He said he wanted to work to eradicate poverty and promote peace, and to "decide together on a controlled immigration policy".

    Despite these fears, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade and Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika were among the first to offer effusive congratulations to the new French president.


    Fearing the Worst for Africa

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think that is what this article said Rufus, 7 miles, but I'm not sure if it was straight down or sideways, or just what.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I can promise you one thing, great pundit that I am, if Romney is the nominee, he'll carry Utah.

    And Idaho too I might add.

    The powerhouse bell weather states of the mountain west!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Romney's also meeting with evangelical leaders, even sending them wooden chairs mounted with plaques declaring, "You are welcome at our table anytime." Last weekend, he gave the commencement address at Pat Robertson's Regent University.

    Of course, Romney's Mormonism makes him a tougher sell to the mostly evangelical Christian Right. But with the two other Republican front-runners staking their independence from Christian conservatives on some key issues and the true Christian Right candidates stuck at 1 percent in the polls, Romney sees his opening.

    And if it is another candidate who winds up winning the Republican nomination, he will need to prove that, when it comes to the Christian Right's role in presidential politics, the math has changed.


    Romney's Table

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'll tell you, Bob; Seven miles is a long danged way - up, down, or sideways.

    I'd hate to be the guy that convinced them to drill down seven miles and come up with a "Dry Hole." :(

    You might not make it to the boss's Christmas Party, you know?

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Europeans are hot n' heavy into gassifying specially "genetically modified" corn. I'm pretty sure bio-gassification is the intermediate future.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Looks like the core is about 1,800 miles down. That makes 7 miles .4% of the distance. Man, there must be alot of untapped potential for energy down there, you would think.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Rufus,

    What is CHP in 'Biogas CHP'? Brown coal looks pretty danged dirty.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sam, that's when you use the excess heat (that's left over from the electrification process) to heat homes, buildings, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sam, Reno, Nv runs entirely on geothermal. Oil is rapidly turning into an International "Scam."

    ReplyDelete