tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post8341285607394290392..comments2024-03-28T06:32:24.557-04:00Comments on The Elephant Bar: Time to Dust Off Import Replacement 101 Deuce ☂http://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comBlogger113125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-27699863143832340892017-09-06T22:43:44.201-04:002017-09-06T22:43:44.201-04:00A hurricane with winds in excess of 180 miles per ...<i>A hurricane with winds in excess of 180 miles per hour is scary enough. But some corners of the Internet are stirring additional panic -- and attracting additional clicks -- by referring to an extreme hurricane category that doesn’t even exist.<br /><br />...<br /><br />The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale was developed by Herbert Saffir, an engineer in Coral Gables, Fla., and Robert Simpson, who headed the National Hurricane Center from 1967 to 1973. The scale used wind speeds as a guide to predict the extent of structural damage.<br /><br />...<br /><br />From time to time, there has been discussion of whether a new category -- Category 6 -- should be added to the scale. That decision would likely fall to the National Hurricane Center after discussions with scientists in the field, said Jill Trepanier, a hurricane specialist in the Louisiana State University department of geography and anthropology.</i>samhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11856051164644278989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-65543457797705627112017-09-06T22:41:43.200-04:002017-09-06T22:41:43.200-04:00Less than optimal.Less than optimal.Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16770268554450465514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-54595793295235043912017-09-06T22:23:17.875-04:002017-09-06T22:23:17.875-04:00Obamacare insurer pulls out of rural Virginia leav...<b>Obamacare insurer pulls out of rural Virginia leaving coverage gaps</b><br /><br />JOHN SEXTON Sep 06, 2017 9:21 PM<br /> TOP PICK<br /><br /><b>“Optima also said it would be raising premiums by 81 percent…”</b><br /><br />https://hotair.com/archives/2017/09/06/obamacare-insurer-pulls-rural-virginia-leaving-coverage-gaps/Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-12113682776492023722017-09-06T22:19:25.707-04:002017-09-06T22:19:25.707-04:00VIDEO CLIPS of O'bozo saying he doesn't ha...VIDEO CLIPS of O'bozo saying he doesn't have the power to do executive amnesty -<br /><br /><b>Remember All The Times Obama Said He Didn’t Have The Power To Rewrite Immigration Laws?</b><br />ALLAHPUNDIT Posted at 10:01 pm on September 6, 2017<br /><br /><i>We all remember. This is probably the second-biggest lie he told as president, after all. (Not quite “lie of the year” material but close.) Still, via Conn Carroll, it’s something to kick back and watch eight minutes of soundbites unfurl as a reminder of the sheer volume of rhetoric he devoted during his first term to warning his base that his hands were tied on executive amnesty.</i> <br /><br />Obama would say that there’s no inconsistency here. He claimed he didn’t have the power to change immigration law and he didn’t change it; he merely exercised “prosecutorial discretion” in placing DREAMers at the back of the line. But that would also be a lie even if he hadn’t taken the extra step of granting DREAMers work permits. If the president deems an enormous class of people effectively exempt from enforcement of a federal statute, then functionally he’s changed the law itself. Imagine, for instance, Trump exercising “prosecutorial discretion” by declaring that anyone with a net worth of $5 million or over won’t be prosecuted for tax evasion as a rule. Technically that’s not a change to the law. Functionally it’d mean the president had unilaterally changed the marginal tax rate for the very rich to zero.<br /><br />SEE ALSO: Obamacare insurer pulls out of rural Virginia leaving coverage gaps<br /><br />DACA was dubious in other ways. Obama introduced the program five months before the 2012 election; for all the sonorous rhetoric dedicated to it over the past 48 hours, ultimately it was a pander aimed at protecting O himself first and foremost. The rationale for executive action, that Congress wasn’t acting “fast enough,” fed the pernicious progressive belief that somehow the president acquires extra constitutional authority to act unilaterally if the legislature doesn’t do what he wants in an expeditious way. (We may see a reprise of that if Congress whiffs on the DREAM Act and Trump keeps DACA going next March.) And of course, writ large, DACA was just a band-aid on a wound that Democrats themselves had allowed to go untreated when they had the power to address it. Victor Davis Hanson:....<br /><br />https://hotair.com/archives/2017/09/06/remember-times-obama-said-didnt-power-rewrite-immigration-laws/Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-76223620554898988102017-09-06T20:53:13.234-04:002017-09-06T20:53:13.234-04:00Yo, ya diggin that hole deeper and deeper masta!Yo, ya diggin that hole deeper and deeper masta!Ashhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688752302081088907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-55306783547914285742017-09-06T20:37:11.951-04:002017-09-06T20:37:11.951-04:00Barbuda's Prime Minister says 90 per cent of b...<i>Barbuda's Prime Minister says 90 per cent of buildings and vehicles in the Caribbean nation have been destroyed by Hurricane Irma.<br /><br />Four people have reportedly been killed by Irma, one of the most powerful Atlantic storms in a century, which has howled past Puerto Rico after thrashing several smaller Caribbean islands with roof-ripping winds, drenching rains and pounding surf on a collision course with Florida.<br /><br />...<br /><br />Irma, with top sustained winds of 300 kilometres per hour, was on track to reach Florida on Saturday or Sunday, becoming the second major hurricane to hit the US mainland in as many weeks.<br /><br />...<br /><br />Businesses throughout San Juan were closed and many buildings were covered with storm shutters.<br /><br />Occasional shoppers were out making final purchases of water, ice and food to prepare for what they feared could be several days without power.</i>samhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11856051164644278989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-26545318240710280932017-09-06T19:36:45.158-04:002017-09-06T19:36:45.158-04:00Opioid Maker Bent Rules to Get Drug to Patients, S...<br /><i><b>Opioid Maker Bent Rules to Get Drug to Patients, Senate Report Says</b></i><br /><br /><i>A representative of Insys Therapeutics Inc. misled a health insurer into approving payment for a prescription of the company’s addictive fentanyl painkiller, and 14 months later the woman who received the prescription was dead at age 32 from complications related to the drug, according to a report by a U.S. Senate committee ...</i><br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-85421023092281111382017-09-06T19:34:13.337-04:002017-09-06T19:34:13.337-04:00Speaking to Sputnik, Russian military expert Andre...<i><br /><br />Speaking to Sputnik, Russian military expert Andrey Koshkin said that it is no accident that the alleged use of chemical weapons by Assad's government remains high on Washington's agenda even though no evidence has been provided.<br /><b><br />"The United States and the whole of the West are writing a sort of detective saga titled 'Assad and the Chemical Weapons'. This is a very profitable theme to constantly draw the world’s attention to the allegations that Bashar Assad is a very bad president,"</b> Koshkin said. <br /><br />He added that<b> "today we see the successes of the Syrian government troops which come against the background of the fourth anniversary of the Ghouta chemical attack which was most likely conducted by the Syrian opposition."<br /><br />"The US sees these two aspects as a 'new page' to make the global community believe that Assad is a 'fearful regime' that allegedly uses chemical weapons against his own people. But these allegations have never been confirmed,"</b> Koshkin said.<br />...<br /><br />Reacting to the incident, Washington, which has not presented any proof of the use of chemical weapons by Damascus, launched 59 cruise missiles at the Syrian governmental military airfield in Ash Sha'irat on April 7.</i><br /><br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-54484692265944712132017-09-06T19:27:03.816-04:002017-09-06T19:27:03.816-04:00All of you guys who voted for Mr Trump, because he...<br />All of you guys who voted for Mr Trump, because he was not a Democrat, have been played for fools, by a lifelong Democrat that hijacked the GOP.<br /><br /><i><b>Trump sides with Democrats on fiscal issues, throwing Republican plans into chaos</b></i><br /><br />Voted, through their Trump proxy, for Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.<br /><br />Reality Television, it just doesn't get better than this. <br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-13248796408413077192017-09-06T19:22:29.931-04:002017-09-06T19:22:29.931-04:00Golly, no one ever went to test the gas that was s...Golly, no one ever went to test the gas that was supposed to used by the Assad regime.<br />Now it is claimed that the 'gas' was supplied by NorK.<br /><br />But when it is said that the NorKs would use such gas against Seoul, fired by any number of the 21,000 artillery pieces in range of Seoul, Robert "Draft Dodger" Peterson does not respond to that very real threat.<br /><br />Guess he just does not care about the 22 million people in Seoul, perhaps because they are not "White Folks" ?<br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-33866369324711870892017-09-06T19:21:25.071-04:002017-09-06T19:21:25.071-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-90842314053330261632017-09-06T18:34:59.180-04:002017-09-06T18:34:59.180-04:00The poison gas used by Assad in Syria was gotten f...The poison gas used by Assad in Syria was gotten from N. Korea -<br /><br />FDR's outlook -<br /><br /><b>FDR’s ‘rattlesnake’ rule & the North Korean threat</b><br />By John Bolton September 5, 2017 | 7:31pm | <br /><br /><i>“When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him.” By these words in a Sept. 11, 1941, fireside chat, Franklin Roosevelt authorized US warships to fire first against Nazi naval vessels, which he called “the rattlesnakes of the Atlantic.”<br /><br />Roosevelt’s order applied whenever German or Italian ships entered “waters of self-defense” necessary to protect the US, including those surrounding US outposts on Greenland and Iceland.<br /><br />Uttered 60 years to the day before 9/11, and less than three months before Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt’s words still resonate. North Korea’s sixth nuclear test last weekend, along with its significantly increased ballistic-missile testing, establishes that Pyongyang is perilously close to being able to hit targets across the continental United States with nuclear warheads, perhaps thermonuclear ones.</i><br /><br />The Nazi threat to US shipping, both normal commercial traffic and war supplies destined for Great Britain, was undeniably significant, and the Axis powers’ broader totalitarian threat was existential. Nonetheless, right up to Dec. 7, 1941, many American leaders urged caution to avoid provoking the Axis and thereby risking broader conflict. Pearl Harbor followed.<br /><br />In his chat, Roosevelt observed that others had “refused to look the Nazi danger squarely in the eye until it actually had them by the throat.” We shouldn’t commit that mistake today. North Korea’s behavior, and its lasting desire to conquer the South, have created the present crisis.<br /><br />Letting Kim Jong-un’s bizarre regime “have America by the throat,” subjecting us and our allies to perpetual nuclear extortion, is not an acceptable outcome.<br /><br />We have endured 25 years of US diplomatic failure, with endless rounds of negotiations, presenting North Korea with the choice between economic incentives or sanctions. During this time, which certainly constitutes “not looking the danger squarely in the eye,” North Korea has repeatedly breached commitments to abandon its nuclear-weapons program, often made in return for handsome compensation.<br /><br />Nonetheless, we hear echoes from Roosevelt’s day that “there is no acceptable military option” when it comes to Pyongyang. This means, as Susan Rice said recently, “we can, if we must, tolerate nuclear weapons in North Korea,” as we did with the Soviets in Cold War days. The US should not accept such counsels of despair, based on dangerously facile and wildly inaccurate historical analogies.<br /><br />Why accept a future of unending nuclear blackmail by Pyongyang, whose governing logic is hardly that of Cold War Moscow, and which would entail not that era’s essentially bipolar standoff, but a far-more-dangerous world of nuclear multipolarity?<br /><br />If Washington lets Kim retain his nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, his regime will happily sell these materials and technologies to Iran, other rogue states or terrorist groups for the right price. This is another key difference from the Cold War; Moscow was substantially more worried about nuclear proliferation than Pyongyang now is.....<br /><br />http://nypost.com/2017/09/05/fdrs-rattlesnake-rule-the-north-korean-threat/Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-12319612995844110842017-09-06T18:27:07.566-04:002017-09-06T18:27:07.566-04:00Gregg Jarrett: Trump, in DACA decision, restores c...<b>Gregg Jarrett: Trump, in DACA decision, restores constitutional sanity to immigration laws</b><br /><br />Gregg Jarrett<br />By Gregg Jarrett Published September 05, 2017 Fox News<br /><br /><i>By executive fiat, President Obama granted amnesty to immigrants living illegally in the United States. <br /><br /><br />It was an unconstitutional act, to be sure. Obama had previously admitted he had no authority to end deportations of illegal aliens when he said, “The notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true.” Then he went about doing it anyway, conjuring a new breadth of hypocrisy.</i><br /><br />His successor, President Trump, is now taking the first step toward restoring sanity to the rule of law as it applies to the Constitution and immigration. <br /><br />By rescinding the Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program that gave a deportation reprieve to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children, Trump is returning legislative authority to the legislature. He is reinstating the separation of powers that are fundamental to our democracy.<br /><br />Usurping Legislative Authority<br /><br />Under the Constitution, congress is vested with writing laws and the president is charged with executing those laws. This is especially true when it comes to immigration. <br /><br />At the end of the 19th century, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that congress has “plenary power” (meaning full and complete) to regulate immigration. Derived from Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the doctrine is based on the concept that immigration is a question of national sovereignty, relating to a nation’s right to define its own borders and restrict entrance therein. <br /><br />As the high court observed,“Over no conceivable subject is the legislative power of Congress more complete.” (Oceanic Stem Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214, U.S. 320)<br /><br />Nevertheless, Obama decided to usurp this power by unilateral directive, unconstrained by established checks and balances. In so doing, he granted himself extra-constitutional authority and upset the carefully balanced separation of powers. He also subverted the nucleus of our constitutional design: the rule of law.<br /><br />The only exception to the power of congress in dictating immigration is the 1952 statute in which the legislative branch transferred its authority to the president in cases involving national security. The president is specifically empowered to restrict foreigners from entering the country to protect the safety and security of Americans. This law formed the basis for President Trump’s travel ban. <br /><br />In all other immigration matters, only congress is authorized to make laws which the president must enforce. ...<br /><br />http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/05/gregg-jarrett-trump-in-daca-decision-restores-constitutional-sanity-to-immigration-laws.htmlCharltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-18146291250030592302017-09-06T18:08:15.923-04:002017-09-06T18:08:15.923-04:00Where Obama used this authority to circumvent Cong...Where Obama used this authority to circumvent Congress on DACA, Trump is using it to return DACA to Congress. After failing to pass this program earlier, members may now be able to succeed by reaching a compromise with their Republican colleagues. Regardless of the outcome, however, the importance of re-establishing an equal legislative branch is paramount for our system and our future.<br /><br />Oh, and the hot takes on why Obama had to circumvent Congress were also highly entertaining. In short, folks were saying that the Republicans in Congress killed immigration deals, which meant that Obama just had to act. He just had to. Yeah, remind me where in the Constitution does it say that if the president doesn’t get his way, he should just hijack the powers of the legislature? Oh, that’s right it doesn’t exist.....<br /><br />https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/09/06/law-professor-dont-bash-trump-over-daca-hes-just-reeling-in-obamas-overreach-n2377394Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-21890071442091311272017-09-06T18:08:00.929-04:002017-09-06T18:08:00.929-04:00Law Professor: Don't Bash Trump Over DACA; Wha...<b>Law Professor: Don't Bash Trump Over DACA; What He Did Was ‘Paramount’ For Our System Of Government</b><br /><br />Matt Vespa Matt Vespa |Posted: Sep 06, 2017 1:15 PM <br /><br /><i>There’s a lot of hysteria going on after the Trump administration decided on a gradual phasing out of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. The program, which was created by executive order under Barack Obama, allows illegal aliens who entered the U.S. as minors to be shielded from deportation if they meet the criteria for a deferment. If they do, they’re eligible for work and study permits. The cost of an application fee is $495, and deferments need to be renewed every two years. In short, one could argue that this is a separation of powers issue, that the executive overreached and created law by decree, and that all DACA is just a way for illegal aliens to bribe the government not to enforce immigration law. Yet, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, argues that all President Trump is doing is returning immigration law to Congress, which should have been done in the first place. He’s just reeling in Obama’s overreach by using the same method the former president used to enact it. <br />There is nothing controversial about how Trump went about terminating DACA:</i><br /><br />President Trump’s expected announcement that he is terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program has met with widespread criticism over the potential cost to roughly 800,000 children of undocumented parents. While I agree with the same concern over the status of these individuals, I do not agree with the same criticism of sending DACA back to Congress. DACA was unilaterally ordered by President Obama after Congress refused to approve the program.<br /><br />Some of us criticized the action as a circumvention of the legislative branch that undermined our system of the separation of powers. But because they liked the result, Democratic members yielded their institutional power to the White House and helped create an unchecked presidency. With Trump using the same authority to pursue his own policies, Democratic leaders now want to radically expand the powers of the judiciary to block an uber presidency of their own making. They have become constitutional short sellers who dump core principles as soon as they raise political costs.<br />New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) announced that they would challenge Trump’s decision in federal court. While they declined to give details of this extraordinary challenge, they would presumably be asking a court to say that Trump could not use the same power to rescind DACA that Obama used to create it. Since the power is the same, what remains is the merits of the policy, something courts have long avoided under the political question doctrine. They would have to say that undocumented individuals can be allowed to stay but not ordered to leave by executive order.<br />[…]<br />Trump’s decision will return this question to where it should have remained: Congress. Presidents do not have the option to go it alone in our system. Obama failed to pass DACA in Congress, and he was left with only two choices. He had to either compromise or change Congress. Sometimes when the country is politically divided, less gets done until we can reach a consensus. However, that consensus is found in the legislative process, not through presidential or judicial proclamations.<br /><br />Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-19347434515098240472017-09-06T15:51:01.753-04:002017-09-06T15:51:01.753-04:00Our thief and liar has not run off, yet.
It'l...<br />Our thief and liar has not run off, yet.<br /><br />It'll happen, soon.<br /><br />It always does.<br /><br />Now that Robert "Draft Dodger" Peterson, the dumbest Trumpette on the world wide web has to bow to the will of Chock Schumer ...<br /><br />His head just may explode<br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-9629124565283961732017-09-06T15:48:44.012-04:002017-09-06T15:48:44.012-04:00The president’s decision came barely an hour after...<i><br /><br />The president’s decision came barely an hour after House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) panned the idea of a brief debt hike, accusing Democrats of “playing politics” with much needed aid for Hurricane Harvey victims by trying to create pressure for their agenda.<br /><br />“Let’s just think about this: We’ve got all this devastation in Texas. We’ve got another unprecedented hurricane about to hit Florida, and they want to play politics with the debt ceiling?,” Ryan told reporters. “I think that’s ridiculous and disgraceful that they want to play politics with the debt ceiling at this moment when we have fellow citizens in need, to respond to these hurricanes so we do not strand them.”<br /><b><br />Trump, apparently, disagreed.</b></i>Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-45009206360366233572017-09-06T15:46:52.906-04:002017-09-06T15:46:52.906-04:00You are cathecting again, Dead Beat Dad, Liar &...You are cathecting again, Dead Beat Dad, Liar & War Criminal.<br /><br />Get some help through TMS here:<br /><br /><br />http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/consumer/scientists-zap-voices-from-schizophrenia-sufferers<br /><br />Ciao<br /><br />Deuce, why not put this arse in the Dunce Box for a couple of months.<br /><br />It helped Ash.Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-36953537142501462122017-09-06T15:40:16.529-04:002017-09-06T15:40:16.529-04:00“The president agreed with Sen. Schumer and Congre...<i><b><br />“The president agreed with Sen. Schumer and Congresswoman Pelosi to do a three-month [funding extension] and a debt ceiling into December, and that’s what I will be offering based on the president’s decision, to the bill. And we’ll try to get 60 votes and move forward,”</b> McConnell told reporters </i><br /><br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-51849346055996935372017-09-06T15:38:40.557-04:002017-09-06T15:38:40.557-04:00Shocking news for the Trumpettes ..
How do you ge...<br />Shocking news for the Trumpettes ..<br /><br />How do you get Republicans to grow a set of balls ...<br />Align with the Democrats.<br /><br /><i><b>President Trump confounded leaders from his own party on Wednesday by siding with Democrats on plans to fund the government and raise the debt ceiling,</b> upending negotiations on a variety of crucial policy areas this fall and further damaging relationships with Republicans on Capitol Hill.<br /><br />Trump made his position clear at a White House meeting with congressional leaders, agreeing with Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) by voicing support for a three-month bill to fund the government and raise the debt ceiling for the same amount of time.<br /><b><br />“We had a very good meeting with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer,”</b> Trump told reporters ... </i><br /><br />Funny stuff from our Reality TV Presidency.<br /><br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-83492830994741108362017-09-06T15:35:32.784-04:002017-09-06T15:35:32.784-04:00Most of it, "Draft Dodger" Peterson is m...<br />Most of it, "Draft Dodger" Peterson is manufactured in the US, sold through pharmacies, legally.<br /><br />It is the US pharmaceutical industry that has pushed thee opiods, not Mexicans.<br />Your bigotry is showing, once again<br />Jack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-1953521880040772852017-09-06T15:32:38.914-04:002017-09-06T15:32:38.914-04:00It is not, nor was not, ever declared unConstituti...<br />It is not, nor was not, ever declared unConstitutional, "Draft Dodger".<br /><br />The Supremes have not heard the caseJack Hawkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00342056653466462640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-39925906161970675672017-09-06T14:31:01.862-04:002017-09-06T14:31:01.862-04:00Unnecessarily disturded -
UPDATE: Woman who force...Unnecessarily disturded -<br /><br /><b>UPDATE: Woman who forced Dali exhumation 'not his daughter'....DRUDGE</b>Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-52701842012366456052017-09-06T14:17:06.938-04:002017-09-06T14:17:06.938-04:00Before you conclude what USA ought to do, read thi...Before you conclude what USA ought to do, read this -<br /><br /><b>Korea Nuclear Test Furthers EMP Bomb</b><br /><br /><i>The official communist party newspaper, Rodong Sinmun, published a report Monday on “the EMP might of nuclear weapons,” outlining an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack produced by detonating a nuclear warhead in space.<br /><br />“In general, the strong electromagnetic pulse generated from nuclear bomb explosions between 30 kilometers and 100 kilometers [18.6 miles and 62 miles] above the ground can severely impair electronic devices, electric machines, and electromagnetic grids, or destroy electric cables and safety devices,” said the article authored by Kim Songwon, dean of Kim Chaek University of Technology in Pyongyang.....</i><br /><br />https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2017/09/korea-nuclear-test-furthers-emp-bomb/<br /><br />Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-37994898849772435372017-09-06T11:52:33.792-04:002017-09-06T11:52:33.792-04:00A good question -
How Can Trump “Revisit” DACA In...A good question -<br /><br /><b>How Can Trump “Revisit” DACA In Six Months If It’s Unconstitutional?</b><br /><br />ALLAHPUNDITPosted at 11:21 am on September 6, 2017<br /><br /><i>A related question: How can he continue the program for six more months if DACA is “an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the Executive Branch,” as Jeff Sessions claimed yesterday? Why not end it today?<br /><br />Also related: Er, how could he have kept the program going for the past seven months if it’s been unconstitutional the whole time?....</i><br /><br />https://hotair.com/archives/2017/09/06/can-trump-revisit-daca-six-months-unconstitutional/Charltonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02337923317977922025noreply@blogger.com