tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post8290894918904984818..comments2024-03-29T06:35:11.321-04:00Comments on The Elephant Bar: Marco Rubio is the Jack Kevorkian of the Republican Party - Ann CoulterDeuce ☂http://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comBlogger48125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-40901964404303956652013-06-15T17:59:58.236-04:002013-06-15T17:59:58.236-04:00fuck You.
"You crazy," Yank.fuck You. <br /><br />"You crazy," Yank.Rufus IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297231055991566183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-13972451828614979252013-06-15T17:58:26.208-04:002013-06-15T17:58:26.208-04:00It would have been fuCkus, except China said, &quo...It would have been fuCkus, except China said, "fuck YOU."<br /><br />:)Rufus IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297231055991566183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-47327700604921023932013-06-15T17:48:36.997-04:002013-06-15T17:48:36.997-04:00FUKUS, FUKUS, FUKUS!
I can't quit you, FUKUS....FUKUS, FUKUS, FUKUS!<br /><br />I can't quit you, FUKUS. :)Rufus IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297231055991566183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-63116773836568909002013-06-15T17:47:19.243-04:002013-06-15T17:47:19.243-04:00FUKUS!<b>FUKUS!</b>Rufus IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297231055991566183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-49731366283385094142013-06-15T17:44:20.035-04:002013-06-15T17:44:20.035-04:00FUKUS is on the case. :) :) :)
Gotta love it.FUKUS is on the case. :) :) :)<br /><br />Gotta love it.Rufus IIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05297231055991566183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-23889753755930656822013-06-15T17:37:34.439-04:002013-06-15T17:37:34.439-04:00France - UK - USFrance - UK - USDeuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-21624091371835232632013-06-15T17:10:19.228-04:002013-06-15T17:10:19.228-04:00In an attempt to weaken the Syrian government'... In an attempt to weaken the Syrian government's air power, rebel fighters attacked several military airports across the country Sunday -- including a sprawling base in Idlib province, dissidents said.<br />"Fighter planes have caused many deaths, so we want to end any such thing as military air power," opposition activist Jehad al-Hamwwi told CNN.<br />The rebel Free Syrian Army devised a plan to attack the military airports and the regime's other strategic bases, said Zukan Hded, a dissident in Idlib province.<br />Syrian troops and rebels battled for control of Idlib's Abu al-Zhuhoor military airport, one of the few places in the opposition-dominated province from which government forces can still inflict damage, the opposition Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-69228578440780786672013-06-15T17:01:39.496-04:002013-06-15T17:01:39.496-04:00Just put a bounty on Iranian aircraft flying into ...Just put a bounty on Iranian aircraft flying into Damascus Airport.<br /><br />Disrupt the resupply?<br /><br />Cause stalemateAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-17326673416750829652013-06-15T16:35:05.713-04:002013-06-15T16:35:05.713-04:00.
FUKUS?
..<br /><br />FUKUS?<br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-16171098591145086972013-06-15T16:30:08.590-04:002013-06-15T16:30:08.590-04:00.
Contented and comfortable.
There are signs eve....<br /><br />Contented and comfortable.<br /><br />There are signs everywhere, put up by the government and the MSM, "Please do not disturb the sheeple".<br /><br />. Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-24066021474881985842013-06-15T15:55:39.583-04:002013-06-15T15:55:39.583-04:00You know that they are lying sacks of shit over th...<b> You know that they are lying sacks of shit over this sarin claim. No serious analysis yet from the US media, but wait:</b><br /><br /><b>Chemical weapons experts still skeptical of U.S. claim that Syria used sarin<br />By Matthew Schofield | McClatchy Washington Bureau<br />First Published Jun 14 2013 09:05 pm • Last Updated Jun 14 2013 09:06 pm</b><br /><br /><br />Washington • Chemical weapons experts voiced skepticism Friday about U.S. claims that the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad had used the nerve agent sarin against rebels on at least four occasions this spring, saying that while the use of such a weapons is always possible, they’ve yet to see the telltale signs of a sarin gas attack, despite months of scrutiny.<br /><br />"It’s not unlike Sherlock Holmes and the dog that didn’t bark," said Jean Pascal Zanders, a leading expert on chemical weapons who until recently was a senior research fellow at the European Union’s Institute for Security Studies. "It’s not just that we can’t prove a sarin attack; it’s that we’re not seeing what we would expect to see from a sarin attack."<br /><br />Foremost among those missing items, Zanders said, are cellphone photos and videos of the attacks or the immediate aftermath.<br /><br />"In a world where even the secret execution of Saddam Hussein was taped by someone, it doesn’t make sense that we don’t see videos, that we don’t see photos, showing bodies of the dead, and the reddened faces and the bluish extremities of the affected," he said.<br /><br />Other experts said that while they were willing to give the U.S. intelligence community the benefit of the doubt, the Obama administration has yet to offer details of what evidence it has and how it obtained it.<br /><br />White House foreign policy adviser Benjamin Rhodes gave dates and places for the alleged attacks - March 19 in the Aleppo suburb of Khan al-Assal; April 13 in the Aleppo neighborhood of Shaykh Maqsud; May 14 in Qasr Abu Samrah in Homs province, and May 23 in Adra, east of Damascus. But he provided no details of the fighting that was taking place or the number of dead.<br /><br />"Ultimately, without more information, we are left with the need to trust the integrity of the U.S. intelligence community in arriving at its ‘high confidence’ judgment," Greg Thielmann, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Arms Control Association, said in an email. While he said that "my guess is they have it right," he also noted that the White House statement was "carefully and prudentially worded" and acknowledged the lack of a "continuous chain of custody for the physiological samples from those exposed to sarin."<br /><br />"It does not eliminate all doubt in my mind," he said.<br /><br />Philip Coyle, a senior scientist at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington, said that without hard, public evidence, it’s difficult for experts to assess the validity of the administration’s statement. He added that from what is known, what happened doesn’t look like a series of sarin attacks to him.<br /><br />"Without blood samples, it’s hard to know," he said. "But I admit I hope there isn’t a blood sample, because I’m still hopeful that sarin has not been used."Deuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-77100445629506187302013-06-15T15:41:39.556-04:002013-06-15T15:41:39.556-04:00BEIRUT — Syrian troops pushed forward with their o...BEIRUT — Syrian troops pushed forward with their offensive against rebels Saturday, capturing a suburb near the Damascus international airport as the U.S. warned that the alleged use of chemical weapons by President Bashar Assad’s forces and the involvement of the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah in the civil war threaten to put a proposed political settlement out of reach.<br /><br />The U.S. and Russia have been pressing for a peace conference to end Syria’s civil war in Geneva, but prospects for that have been dampened after a series of regime battlefield victories and hardened positions by both sides as the death toll from the more than 2-year-old conflict has surged to nearly 93,000.<br /><br />President Barack Obama’s decision this week to send lethal aid to Syrian rebels and the deepening involvement of trained Shiite fighters from Lebanon’s Hezbollah group also has raised the stakes, setting up a proxy fight between Iran and the West that threatens to engulf more of the Middle East.<br /><br />The U.S. reversal after months of saying it would not intervene in the conflict militarily came after Washington said it had conclusive evidence the Syrian regime had used chemical weapons, something Obama had said would be a “red line.”<br /><br />Syria has denied the accusations, saying Obama was lying about the evidence to justify his decision to arm the rebels. Syria’s ally Russia also suggested Saturday that the evidence put forth by the United States of the use of chemical weapons doesn’t meet stringent criteria for reliability.Deuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-13283646258359666302013-06-15T15:38:59.564-04:002013-06-15T15:38:59.564-04:00{…}
If someone cuts her/himself with a knife cutt...{…}<br /><br />If someone cuts her/himself with a knife cutting cheese, the first time it is called an accident. The second time without using a cutting board, it is carelessness. The third time, it is stupidity. Remember 9/11? There remain huge questions to be asked as to the veracity of the Pentagon strike, as to the monitoring of the entire event, from the then National Security Advisor, why who else? Condy Rice. Sterling job.<br /><br />There are enormous questions to be asked about the veracity of the casus belli providing the background to the invasion of Iraq. Remember the claims that Saddam Hussein had Weapons of Mass Destruction? OK then ten years on, where are they? Remember the claims that Saddam Hussein was using factories to produce chemical weapons, which turned out to be milk powder for babies? Remember the claims that Saddam Hussein was posing an immediate threat to the USA and its allies? Remember the claims that Saddam Hussein was procuring yellowcake uranium from Niger to make nuclear weapons, when he didn't even have a centrifuge working?<br /><br />Remember the claims that Colonel Gaddafi was slaughtering his civilians and bombing them, when there was not a shred of evidence supporting such a claim?<br /><br />The point is that the FUKUS Axis (France, UK, US) has tried this tack time and time again and fuelled by a supporting bought media, has managed to whitewash public opinion, duping a gullible public brought up on chuckles, chortles and giggles based around belching on the Simpsons. And time and time again the "real" media has outed such claims as bullshit.<br /><br />Yet they continue. What Washington does not say is that the anti-Assad (30%) faction contains increasing numbers of al-Qaeda operatives, as was the case in Iraq and Libya, what Washington does not say is that arming the terrorists would escalate the conflict, what Washington does not say is that NATO is providing support for the terrorists to operate through Turkey.<br /><br />And NATO/FUKUS is failing. Hence the claim that the Syrian Government is using chemical/biological weapons. It is predictable as the child who claims it was not he who destroyed the entire collection of houseplants in the conservatory, but rather the plastic dinosaur he holds in his hand.<br /><br />Is President Obama that plain stupid? Does he think his people are stupid? Or is he a barefaced liar? Who said "Change"? The man is a traitor to his word, an insult to humankind and a very bad example of a Nobel peace prizewinner. Let this be his political epitaph: he manages to be even worse than Bush.<br /><br />Photo: President al-Assad visits Syrian soldier wounded by western-backed terrorist forces. Nice one, Barack! How many more are you going to fund to murder? How many more Syrian families are you going to destroy? Remember NATO's cold-blooded murder of the Gaddafi grandchildren? Makes you happy? Nobel peace prize indeed.... Shame on you.<br /><br />Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey<br /><br />Pravda.RuDeuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-65312378126029127362013-06-15T15:38:16.150-04:002013-06-15T15:38:16.150-04:00{…}
Let us take Syria as an example. After consta...{…}<br /><br />Let us take Syria as an example. After constant attempts to whitewash the Government as an "evil regime" failed, along with constant attempts to pin the Government of President Assad (which has the support of around 70 per cent of the Syrian people, more than Obama and Cameron combined), here we have the USA lying, once again, producing images from April, stating that the Syrian Government used Sarin gas.<br /><br />And what do they use as evidence? The "broad range" of evidence, including "multiple" incidents of the use of chemical weapons by the "Syrian regime", as Washington claims, is based upon some footage of anti-Assad terrorists lying in beds with shaving foam around their mouths, eyes blinking and alert, holding their heads and writhing around slowly.<br /><br />Is that it? Apparently. Well, I could stage a better coup myself and a more realistic one. Chemical and biological weapons cover a broad array of weaponry but the symptoms I would show if I were trying to lie to the public would include people lying in their backs, motionless, eyes vacant, with foam but not shaving cream around the mouth, vomiting uncontrollably and generally looking like they were close to death. Certainly not blinking, holding their heads and moving around.<br /><br />This particular "incident" in April was covered here in this column at the time, as were previous attempts to accuse the Syrian government of using chemical and biological weapons, including attempts to smuggle chemical weapons into Syria through Turkey and then stage a false flag event to justify a war, a military intervention. Basically, it is bullshit.<br /><br />And let us go further: if President Obama states that the Syrian Government is using chemical or biological weapons, based upon this, then he is a barefaced liar. And if he does make such statements it is clear that it is not President Obama that runs the USA, it is Senator McCain and his disgusting, nasty, underhanded Republican band of warmongers. I thought he lost the election years back, together with his poodle, that screaming witch from Alaska, the darling of the tea party studies in ignorance.<br /><br />{…}<br /><br />{Deuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-21244490304437241032013-06-15T15:37:40.452-04:002013-06-15T15:37:40.452-04:00You have to read this; Which part ( remember this ...<b> You have to read this; Which part ( remember this is from Pravda) of this is not true?</b><br /><br /><br />The idiotic foreign policy of the USA<br />15.06.2013 01:03<br /><br /><br />Washington appears caught in the grip of an outdated, anachronistic and puerile, vapid, shallow foreign policy-making outfit controlled by intellectually limited political freaks of yesteryear, pandering to the whims of the lobbies that control them, insulting the collective intelligence of humankind and using lies to justify their evil plans.<br /><br />I am not one of those who subscribes to the notion that all Americans are fat and stupid. My answer to those (racists/xenophobes) that say so is to ask them to try and get into an American University and then call them stupid. So, if the United States of America has such excellent schools of higher education and if the USA produces such excellent scholars, why does the country pursue such a puerile, shallow, anachronistic, outdated and idiotic foreign policy?<br /><br />{…}<br /><br />Deuce ☂https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472858446242700869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-43033777943789021512013-06-15T15:36:35.612-04:002013-06-15T15:36:35.612-04:00.
"In a sense, Obama owns Syria now," s....<br /><br /><i>"In a sense, Obama owns Syria now," says Joshua Landis, a highly regarded Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma. "I presume he'll try to go in toe by toe.… But he has to decide what his objectives are, which he hasn't. Does he want to provide just enough arms to keep the status quo and divide Syria in two? Does he want to give them enough to take Damascus and drive the Alawites [President Bashar al-Assad's ruling sect] into the mountains? Does he want he want to see them take over the entire country?"<br /> <br />The evidence so far is that the administration will go no further than to try to maintain the bloody standoff, which has cost more than 90,000 lives, for the time being...</i><br /><br />If true, and it very well could be, this points to just how cynical the US and its allies are in citing their concern over the dead in Syria. Do they, as the rat would argue, just want to keep the parties arguing amongst themselves? Doubtful. More likely they stumbled into this mess the same way they have stumbled into all the others and now it's spinning out of their control. Pushed by arrogance, incompetance, and the need 'to do something' they established 'red lines' they never should have and now risk looking like weak sisters if they do nothing.<br /><br /><br />http://www.nationaljournal.com/nationalsecurity/slip-sliding-toward-obama-s-third-war-20130614<br /><br />.<br />Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-73759425495492285552013-06-15T15:18:57.477-04:002013-06-15T15:18:57.477-04:00.
Why mist we constantly elect pricks who feel th....<br /><br />Why mist we constantly elect pricks who feel the need 'to do something', guys who lack the balls just to say "No"?<br /><br /><i>This more benign reading of American policy would see Mr Obama’s “red line” as a case study in the use of rhetoric in geopolitics. He has been trapped by the evidence that his “red line” on the use of chemical weapons has been crossed, and feels that, for the sake of his credibility, he has to ratchet up the US response. However repugnant chemical and biological warfare might be, this is a line that should never have been drawn. One of the first rules of diplomacy is never to issue threats that you are not prepared to carry out, and it has been obvious from his dithering in recent weeks that Mr Obama was far from eager to follow through on his implied threat.</i><br /><br />http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-syrias-red-line-should-never-have-been-drawn-8659611.html<br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-81265963535674704822013-06-15T15:12:14.635-04:002013-06-15T15:12:14.635-04:00.
The way of the world, at least, the one we live....<br /><br />The way of the world, at least, the one we live in.<br /><br />From the NYT opinionator piece <b>The Stone: The Real War on Reality</b><br /><br /><br /><i>Important insight into the world these companies came from a 2010 hack by a group best known as LulzSec (at the time the group was called Internet Feds), which targeted the private intelligence firm HBGary Federal. That hack yielded 75,000 e-mails. It revealed, for example, that Bank of America approached the Department of Justice over concerns about information that WikiLeaks had about it. The Department of Justice in turn referred Bank of America to the lobbying firm Hunton and Willliams, which in turn connected the bank with a group of information security firms collectively known as Team Themis.<br /><br />Team Themis (a group that included HBGary and the private intelligence and security firms Palantir Technologies, Berico Technologies and Endgame Systems) was effectively brought in to find a way to undermine the credibility of WikiLeaks and the journalist Glenn Greenwald (who recently broke the story of Edward Snowden’s leak of the N.S.A.’s Prism program), because of Greenwald’s support for WikiLeaks. Specifically, the plan called for actions to “sabotage or discredit the opposing organization” including a plan to submit fake documents and then call out the error. As for Greenwald, it was argued that he would cave “if pushed” because he would “choose professional preservation over cause.” That evidently wasn’t the case...</i><br /><br />http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/the-real-war-on-reality/<br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-40056960454567920052013-06-15T14:59:22.967-04:002013-06-15T14:59:22.967-04:00.
The Russian foreign minister said that evidence....<br /><br /><i>The Russian foreign minister said that evidence of chemical weapons use cited by the Americans was unreliable because the samples were not taken by experts or properly monitored until they reached a laboratory.</i><br /><br />NYT<br /><br />. Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-44908003457033551142013-06-15T14:58:40.739-04:002013-06-15T14:58:40.739-04:00.
Drivers’ license information of most Americans ....<br /><br /><i>Drivers’ license information of most Americans would be accessible through a nationwide computer network if the immigration legislation pending before the Senate becomes law.</i><br /><br />NYT<br /><br />. <br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-45104322449127224812013-06-15T14:54:48.382-04:002013-06-15T14:54:48.382-04:00.
President Obama, who as a Democratic senator a....<br /><br /><br /><i>President Obama, who as a Democratic senator accused the Bush administration of violating civil liberties in the name of security, now vigorously defends his own administration’s collection of Americans’ phone records and Internet activities. <br /><br />Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said he thinks Congress has done sufficient intelligence oversight. His evidence? Opinion polls.<br /><br />House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi defended the programs’ legality and said she wants Edward Snowden prosecuted for leaking details of the secret operations. <br /><br />Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee, accused Snowden of treason and defended false testimony given to her committee by the director of national intelligence, who in March had denied the programs’ existence.<br /><br />With some exceptions, progressive lawmakers and the liberal commentariat have been passive and acquiescent toward the secret spying programs, which would have infuriated the left had they been the work of a Republican administration...</i><br /><br />. <br />Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-700439175552688392013-06-15T14:48:14.370-04:002013-06-15T14:48:14.370-04:00.
As I pointed out above, the chem weapons use wa....<br /><br />As I pointed out above, the chem weapons use was merely a convenient excuse, the CYA options if you like. <br /><br /><br /><i>President Obama’s decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels followed more than a year of internal debate over whether it was worth the dual risks of involving the United States in another war and seeing U.S. weapons fall into the hands of extremist groups among the rebels.<br /><br />The White House said the final push came this week after U.S. intelligence agencies concluded with “high certainty” that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons against the rebels.</i><br /><br /><br />http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/decision-to-arm-syrian-rebels-was-reached-weeks-ago-us-officials-say/2013/06/14/3cc2d372-d51a-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html?hpid=z1<br /><br />.<br /><br />Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-88223842047749834042013-06-15T14:41:54.143-04:002013-06-15T14:41:54.143-04:00.
UN hesitent to take US word on Syrian chemical ....<br /><br />UN hesitent to take US word on Syrian chemical weapons.<br /><br /><i>Ban said he appreciated the willingness of the United States, Britain, France and other governments to provide evidence to a U.N. team investigating the possible use of chemical weapons in Syria. But he cautioned that “any information on the alleged use of chemical weapons cannot be ensured without convincing evidence of the chain of custody.”</i><br /><br />http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-claims-of-chemical-weapons-against-syrian-rebels-meet-caution-at-un/2013/06/14/a736df6e-d524-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html?hpid=z2<br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-7506812366600035432013-06-15T14:32:32.494-04:002013-06-15T14:32:32.494-04:00.
More bullshit from the bullshitter in chief.
T....<br /><br />More bullshit from the bullshitter in chief.<br /><br /><i>The FBI has shrugged off growing congressional anxiety over its surveillance of US citizens, claiming such programs could have foiled the 9-11 terrorist attacks and would prevent "another Boston".</i><br /><br />One has to ask, if Meuller was right, given that the NSA evesdropping has been going on for a decade or more, one has to say don't be telling me about "another Boston", why wasn't the "last Boston" prevented.<br /><br /><i>But Mueller's testimony before the House judicial oversight committee brought angry responses from many congressmen, who questioned whether such surveillance was lawful and demanded to know why it had failed to prevent the Boston bombing if it were so effective.</i><br /><br />http://2164th.blogspot.com/2013/06/blog-post_15.html?showComment=1371320406833#c50274608158460415<br /><br /><br />Meuller is stepping down in September. Can't wait to see him go.<br /><br />.Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21297199.post-502746081584604152013-06-15T14:20:06.833-04:002013-06-15T14:20:06.833-04:00.
Some can piss and moan about McCain and Graham ....<br /><br />Some can piss and moan about McCain and Graham but in the end it will be the team of Obama, Rice, Powers, and Kerry that actually take us to war in Syria.<br /><br />They will/have provided the excuse just as they did in Libya, just as Bush did in Iraq. <br /><br />No one remembers that Reid, Pelosi, Biden, Clinton, and Feinstein all voted for the Iraq War resolution. Today it is Bush's war.<br /><br />If we go to war in Syria, it will be Obama's war.<br /><br />.<br />Quirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00272168240606512672noreply@blogger.com