THE. LIBERTARIAN

“If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." - Henry David Thoreau

Monday, October 16, 2006

Accountability


All over the world, people are on the move for opportunity and prosperity.

From the AP article, Fears of 'Two-Speed Europe' Still Exist
By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer

BRATISLAVA, Slovakia - Miroslav Fasik is an EU citizen by chance and a chauffeur by choice, and he's frustrated at being stuck in Europe's slow lane. After emigrating from Serbia a decade ago, Fasik, 40, had high hopes of prosperity and opportunity when his adopted Slovakia joined the European Union. Two and a half years later, he feels duped.

"I'm still a second-class citizen," he said. "I don't have euros in my pockets. I don't have the right to move my business to Germany or get a job in Austria. This is not the Europe I had in mind."

What struck me about this paragraph was the fact that Miroslav Fasik had immigrated from Serbia into Slovakia for a better life and then had the expectation of moving to "Old Europe" in search of greater monetary rewards. I wonder if he has a love of country. Does he still think of Serbia as his home or did he truly adopt Slovakia? Where do his loyalties lie? How does he honor his heritage?

The old South of my youth was a two race, Christian society of segregated black and white cultures. Prayers were freely and frequently offered at all public events. Old Glory was proudly raised and saluted, and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited at the start of each school day where young men were taught the virtues of chivalry, Duty, Honor and Country. Men, honoring their heritage, stood as the old anthem, Dixie, was played before high school football games. In this world there were no Arabs, no Asians, no Hispanics, no Indians, and no eskimos. It was a homogenous, apartheid society.

Life is different now. Things are changing.

The old, Jim Crow south of my early youth had long since disappeared as the diversity decades of the 1980's and 1990's brought people from all over the world. Living in a university town, I had already seen the influx of Asians and Indians. I had learned that the Patels were the Smiths of the subcontinent and although I was aware of the Mexican workforce in the boom-or-bust oil towns of Texas, no such groups had yet been found in southeastern demographics. A few years ago, maybe ten or more, during a Sunday drive through rural south Georgia I noticed something that I had never seen before; gathered in the shade of ancient oaks at rural southern cross roads were groups of 10 or 20 Hispanic men socialising on their day of rest. To a southerner old enough to have one foot in old Dixie and the other in the new south, this was a first sighting.

Since that first sighting, the Hispanic population in the U.S. has now grown to an estimated 11 to 15 million. The true number is unknown. It has been estimated that 4,000 people per night move north across the southern border into the United States but because we have little control of the southern border, the true number is unknown.

Its the Security, stupid

In the days after September 11, 2001 the Federal Government assured it's citizens that it was doing all that it could to prevent further attacks. In addition to learning that all but one of the 9/11 highjackers were Saudis, we also learned that the Saudis had been given preferential immigration treatment. We learned that a special diversity lottery was allowing thousands of middle-easterners into the country with little oversight or screening. The Government assured us that it was making all efforts to prevent more "evil-doers" from entering the country. Evidence of the "redoubled efforts" resulted in a furor which erupted when US Immigrations officials insisted on finger-printing and photographing international travelers entering the US. Congress passed legislation authorizing 10,000 new border agents but then a year later, we learned that only a few hundred new agents had been hired. A bewildered public wondered why the President had not authorized the funding needed to implement the expanded border security forces. Realizing that something was amiss, the Minute Men formed and began patrolling the border. The President slandered them as a vigilante group but the public demanded action. Congress, hearing the hue and cry from the hustings, set out to resolve the problem and it soon became obvious to all why only lip service had been paid to the problems of uncontrolled immigration across the southern border. To do so, would thwart the ongoing efforts of elitist one Worlders seeking to eradicate borders and globalists seeking a North American Union. In addition, big business has become addicted to the cheap and consequence free illegal labor and the Government of Mexico is heavily dependant on it's expat remittances. These groups have been lobbying at cross purposes with the public's desire for control of the borders followed by immigration reform.


Accountability


Like the 4,000 people moving in the night, other groups have been quietly working in the shadows to advance their special interest agendas. Day by day, little by little, the veil has been lifted and the agendas are being exposed. The "undocumented population" has ballooned since the days of Ronald Reagan when we were assured that an amnesty would not result in increased illegal immigration. Many point out that the great majority of illegals are good people; desperate people seeking honest work and better lives.

This is not about a zenophobic American public. Americans are better than that (possibly to a fault). This has become an issue of the accountability of the Federal Government to an American public. An American public which increasingly feels that it has been deceived by too many and for too long. Congress will not be allowed to implement an amnesty system before the borders are controlled. Congress and the President will be held accountable for the security they have promised but miserably failed to deliver.

44 comments:

  1. Lifting the veil on Marriage

    Coming up: Gay Americans are doing the virtues that Straight Americans just won't do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "The shift, reported by the US
    Census Bureau in its 2005 American Community Survey, could herald a sea change in every facet of American life -- from family law to national politics and its current emphasis on family values."

    Its inevitable, afterall. There is cultural primacy of anal sex and sapphic buffets. Afterall:

    "while 36.7 million belonged to a category described as "nonfamily households," a term that experts said referred primarily to gay or heterosexual couples cohabiting out of formal wedlock."

    Just those hard-workin gay folks trying to make ends meat. Meanwhile,

    "It indicated that efforts by
    President George W. Bush and his allies, who over the past five years have made a concerted effort to shore up traditional marriage and families through tax breaks, special legislation and church-sponsored campaigns is bearing little fruit."

    Get it? gay marriage - bearing little fruit! HA!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You mean recruiting little fruit?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Gay Hegemons, they will not be stopped. The poofsters just set off a cultural nuke.

    "Overall, what I see is a situation in which people -- especially children -- will be much more isolated, because not only will their parents both be working, but they'll have fewer siblings, fewer cousins, fewer aunts and uncles," the scholar argued. "So over time, we're moving towards a much more individualistic society."

    So in LA, NYC and San Fran, soon being gay will seem like being Christian. Chic onanism will be the safest thing in a world over run with Muslims.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From the link:
    Unmarried couples gravitated toward big cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco, while the farm states in the Great Plains and rural communities of the Midwest and West remained bastions of traditionalism, according to the survey.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Someone must hold the straights responsible for how they destroyed the American family!

    Look to the acerbic wits and moisturized hands of the nations' boyscout leaders! They will lead us out of the cultural muck of medieval family structures and into the wonderful world of retail, ambiguous sexual identity and managing your orgy obligations when the totts are in bed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. that them thar "traditionalism" is why i love ladies and want to make a family withem. cant git myy head offit! just love traditionalistic things...

    "The survey also found that homosexuals were becoming more 'gay' as urban cultures began warming to their lifestyles."

    ReplyDelete
  8. John Karr will be the Rosa Parks.

    "He was the man who refused to accept the nuclear family and embraced an individualist ethos, seeking to free a young girl from the confines of patriarchy and matriarchy..."


    "...That is, until Islam arrived and clarified it all for us."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Whit,
    As honest an appraisal of what is happening in this country as I have seen or heard. Congratulations on a great piece.

    If we do not stop the North American Union and the elitist from bastardizing this country there will be a civil war.
    There are enough good old boys and girls to stop this by force of arms if necessary.
    To President Bush and the Congressional leadership this is a warning. Stop and rethink your goals or you will be handling dynamite right here in America.
    You are failing your Constitutional duty and it is the citizenry's right to perforce change if that continues.
    The enumerations in the Declaration of Independence have not withered nor will sub rosa tyranny be allowed.

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
    Thomas Jefferson

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just those hard-workin gay folks trying to make ends meat

    Ha ha, I get it!

    Q. What is the difference between a gay guy and a freezer?

    A. A freezer doesn't fart when you pull your meat out.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. See thar! Look at that one ^

    Trying to subvert our wholesome commentin with nothin but contempt and cynicism for nature's design, as if flatulence was made to amuse them while they plotted against us!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Theyll be all Shinta Cho to yer face, but at the back of your house, they are herdin the kids into one of their decadent 18-wheelers.

    They load em all up onto container ships and have disgusting saturnalias thatd make burning man goers blush with violated senses of restraint and reserve. When theyre done, they usually scuttle the whole frotting, meth-addled ship.

    ReplyDelete
  14. See, Habu's got the idea.

    He hit that nail right on its good ol' head, and it sings like a Bozeman sow.

    Just gotta create our own lil militia. Then we just ship ourselves over to those god forsaken lands. And the first town we goto, we uh...well what do we do then, Mr. Habu?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ease up on the caffiene ole chap.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Woah, check out BC, its the Richard and Ruby show!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I gotta be defendin against the inimicals

    ReplyDelete
  18. Where the hell is everyone? I dont want to spam so im not postin anymore till some folks come around. Sheesh. They arent at BC.

    Did one of Habu's nuclear green lights finally flash on so everyones too busy finally gittin round to that victory stuff? Is DR shootin rainbows and stars out of a glowing graphic on his stomach?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Glowing graphic?

    I didn't want to argue with whit, since he said everything about right.

    Was waiting for rufus, but I think he's mad at us. Well me and allen, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  20. At the half.
    Arizona 20
    Bears 0

    ReplyDelete
  21. TigerHawk examines “More on the GOP malaise” by introducing a lengthy lede by Instapundit; wherein, at the very end, a correspondent “gets it”:

    “Is it a tantrum to hold an intervention for a good friend who has become lost to himself through drink or drugs? To confront a good friend who seems to have lost his principles? To have lost his way?"

    Indeed, Republican leadership has no principles, save for winning elections. The base is tired of being forced to choose the lesser of evils.
    Link

    ReplyDelete
  22. DR..can you here me now?

    I don't know if Rufus is mad or just very passionate as we get closer to a tight election.
    I kinda followed ya'll colleque and he seems a good deal more animated about the prospects of a Democratic anything, while if I read you correctly you're being more circumspect about the system in general.
    I do believe we are in one of those tight spots in history but I've got one little ole vote and each year it seems to do less and less for me. I have no answers, just keep vot'n til the insurrrection builds to a flash point. And I do think it could happen.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Allen,
    I don't think anyone in DC has a principled position that money could not alter.
    Once you've gone through the political system, local-state-federal you're number one a "party person" cause they got you there.
    Then you get onto a committee and do the appropriate head nodding while lobbyists write laws for you to put in the hopper. I don't see a principled soul anywhere in DC...much to much a zero sum game now..no center.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Instapundits number 5 on the list.
    4. Immigration: Another unforced error. The national security constituency once again lost faith in the Administration. You can't talk about secure borders when the borders are porous. The Administration also failed to make a strong clear argument for immigration, outsourcing that to the Wall Street Journal, which did its best but couldn't do the President's job. Again, the White House's position on immigration was defensible in the abstract, but favoring easy immigration is one thing, favoring easy illegal immigration is another.

    Rush was all over this Instapundit post today, especially the part that says Republicans deserve to lose. I agree with Rush on that one. I can criticize my team but I don't want to see the other team win. NO WAY!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Habu:
    That's why I will not send a Democrat to Washington, no matter how conservative they sound. Once they get to the Potomac, the national Dems have them. I've seen it happen too many times.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Over at the BC under Fly the unfriendly skies, there is the assumption that, because President Clinton took an obsessively legalistic tack to CIA rendititons, Senator Clinton will be hurt thereby. Instantly, the writer follows this bit of folk wisdom with the observation, “These legal restrictions were imposed during the Clinton era but never lifted by President Bush.”

    Let me get this straight: former president Clinton introduced a moronic policy for dealing with the transport of terrorists; one subsequently continued by President Bush, and all this will hurt Mrs. Clinton in 2008. Call me slow, but how will this longstanding bi-partisan policy hurt Hillary?

    And the Republicans wonder why they are having problems in the polls. Repeat after me, “These legal restrictions were imposed during the Clinton era but never lifted by President Bush.” Why, goodness me, that would make them Mr. Bush’s policies.

    ReplyDelete
  27. “Oh, won’t you come with me, to my little corner of the world?”
    Rice: World united against North Korea

    You know, world peace might come about if the rest of us could get our hands on whatever it is this woman is smoking. Oh, yeah, it’s my birthday!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ace draws me up short, making me reconsider Dr. Rice’s belief that the world stands behind the US in one very real sense. Link

    Navy 'too weak' for big role in Korea blockade:

    “[S]enior Royal Navy officers last night cast serious doubt over Britain's ability to make a significant naval contribution to the proposed UN force, claiming that drastic cuts in government spending on the navy over the past decade had severely reduced their ability to participate in major foreign operations.”

    “Defence experts predicted that the most the Royal Navy could contribute was a single frigate, a Royal Fleet auxiliary support vessel and a Trafalgar class hunter killer submarine.”

    “As a result of government cutbacks any British ships deployed to the South China Sea to enforce the UN resolution would depend on the American or French navies to provide "beyond visual range" air defence with their aircraft carriers.”

    “The Navy has been cut by almost a third since Labour came into power…”

    Hey, Mr. Bush’s 150 ship US Navy is sounding better all the time. Cut! Cut! Cut! While the world stands behind us in abject terror.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This is going to come as a shock to the many faithful who hold to the myth of the correlation between human industrial activity and global warming.

    The Sun done it!
    Link

    Oh, I am such a hateful, insensitive man. Woe is me!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Good night, Allen.

    Good night, Allen.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rufus is just too busy taking it all in. Too many reasons for US to be upbeat.

    Cede the ground and if you meant to do that, its part of the grand plan.

    ReplyDelete
  32. No matter the Mohemmedans marching through europe and northward from south america. Just more to not care about.

    ReplyDelete
  33. BC traffic is gone
    an end to an era

    no mad fiddler
    no cardozo bozo
    no boghie
    no engineer-poet
    no Jennifer
    No truepeers
    No tom paine
    No Marcus
    No Verc
    no mika
    no Rwe
    no neo-neocon
    no heather
    no raymond sha

    ReplyDelete
  34. Rumsfeld is too busy transforming to be bothered with your accountability deuce.

    He wants to buy the army a coke - three of them to carry with the gun for the 4 block war.

    Serving po'boys when the specifications call for a hoagie.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Happy Belated Birthday, Allen. Good links btw.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "Let me get this straight: former president Clinton introduced a moronic policy for dealing with the transport of terrorists; one subsequently continued by President Bush, and all this will hurt Mrs. Clinton in 2008. Call me slow, but how will this longstanding bi-partisan policy hurt Hillary? "
    ---
    Because it helps Bush in that it further establishes his Supremacy as the Wussiest Occupant ever in the history of the Whitehouse.
    ---
    ...and you know how them BC Boys lap up on that Wuss Factor.
    ---
    But back to more serious issues:

    Teresita said...
    Just those hard-workin gay folks trying to make ends meat

    Ha ha, I get it!

    Q. What is the difference between a gay guy and a freezer?

    A. A freezer doesn't fart when you pull your meat out.

    ---
    LOL, thanks for that, Terrorita!

    ReplyDelete

  37. href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52467 ">More on the One Worlders


    WASHINGTON – The master plan for merging the U.S., Mexico and Canada is being devised in American University's Center for North American Studies whose faculty is subsidized by the U.S. State Department through the Fulbright Program.
    For example, joining the center this fall as a visiting chairman in North American studies is Canadian Donald Avery, professor emeritus in the history department at the University of Western Ontario. He arrives at American University through the Fulbright Program, funded through the U.S. State Department.
    The university's Center for North American Studies is headed by Robert A. Pastor, the architect of a plan for a North American Union modeled after the European Union – complete with its own currency, the Amero, replacing the dollar.
    "The Center for North American Studies (CNAS) at American University aims to educate a new generation of students to begin a North American journey comparable to that begun in Europe five decades ago," explains the center's website. "The center examines the differences and shared characteristics of Canada, Mexico and the United States; compares the North American experiment with Europe's; and challenges students and faculty to imagine a continental future."


    Tiger @ Observanda

    ReplyDelete
  38. You have got to get rid of your Dept of State. You might want Canada, but I’m not sure about Mexico. On second thought, you might want Canada, all but Quebec. I’d say Mexico & Quebec would be more trouble than they’re worth. If you’d had better intel in 1812 you’d have had Canada cheaply. But then again, strategic intelligence analysis has never been an American strong suite, has it. (Sorry, couldn’t resist the jibe there. I suppose it has been as good/bad as any).

    ReplyDelete
  39. BC traffic is gone an end to an era

    If it ain't broke, fix it til it is.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Those 2 in the morning post, the ghost is back, souds close, but no cigar.
    po' boys and hoagies
    think we're watchin Emrill Live?

    ReplyDelete
  41. rat, that's not quite obscure enough. Could you fix it, and make it a little more incomprehensible?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Sure buddy, those post in the 2 o'clock hour were posted by an identiy thieve.

    Another desert rat.
    staying on message, to a degree.

    but rwe is still posting at BC

    ReplyDelete